Research database

Displaying 71 - 80 of 305
Fawley-King, K., Trask, E., E. Calderón, N., A. Aarons, G., & F. Garland, A. (2014). Implementation of an evidence-based parenting programme with a Latina population: Feasibility and preliminary outcomes. Journal of Children's Services, 9(4), 295–306.
Model(s) reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting
Rating: Does not pass screens
Feely, M., Seay, K. D., Lanier, P., Auslander, W., & Kohl, P. L. (2018). Measuring fidelity in research studies: A field guide to developing a comprehensive fidelity measurement system. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 35(2), 139–152.
Model(s) reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting
Rating: Does not pass screens
Ferrari, A. J., Whittingham, K., Boyd, R., Sanders, M., & Colditz, P. (2011). Prem Baby Triple P a new parenting intervention for parents of infants born very preterm: Acceptability and barriers. Infant Behavior & Development, 34(4), 602-609.
Model(s) reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting
Rating: Does not pass screens
Fletcher, R., Freeman, E., & Matthey, S. (2011). The impact of behavioural parent training on fathers’ parenting: A meta-analysis of the Triple P-Positive Parenting Program. Fathering. A Journal of Theory, Research, & Practice about Men as Fathers, 3(9), 291-312.
Model(s) reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting
Rating: Does not pass screens
Foskolos, K. (2015). The acceptability and efficacy of a brief universal preventive parenting intervention for child behavioural and emotional disorders (Doctoral dissertation, University of Oxford). Retrieved from https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:cb6b28fb-12ad-4e81-b6d3-2134f7dfaec8
Model(s) reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting
Rating: Does not pass screens
Frank, T. J., Keown, L. J., & Sanders, M. R. (2015). Enhancing father engagement and interparental teamwork in an evidence-based parenting intervention: A randomized-controlled trial of outcomes and processes. Behavior Therapy, 46(6), 749–763.
Model(s) reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting
Rating: Does not pass screens
Fujiwara, T., Kato, N. & Sanders, M. R. (2015). Erratum: “Effectiveness of Group Positive Parenting Program (Triple P) in changing child behavior, parenting style, and parental adjustment: An intervention study in Japan.” Journal of Child and Family Studies, 24(5),1526.
Model(s) reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting
Rating: Does not pass screens
Fujiwara, T., Kato, N. & Sanders, M. R. (2015). Erratum: “Effectiveness of Group Positive Parenting Program (Triple P) in changing child behavior, parenting style, and parental adjustment: An intervention study in Japan.” Journal of Child and Family Studies, 24(5),1526.
Model(s) reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting
Rating: Does not pass screens
Fulkerson, E. E. (2014). Parent connection: A parent program to enhance child group psychotherapy (Doctoral dissertation, Spalding University).
Model(s) reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting
Rating: Does not pass screens
Gagné, M. H., Bélanger-Gravel, A., Clément, M. È., & Poissant, J. (2018). Recall and understanding of a communication campaign designed to promote positive parenting and prevent child maltreatment. Preventive Medicine Reports, 12, 191–197.
Model(s) reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting
Rating: Does not pass screens