Childhood Asthma Prevention Study (CAPS)

Model effectiveness research report last updated: 2012

Effects shown in research

Positive parenting practices

Findings rated high

Childhood Asthma Prevention Study (CAPS)
Show findings details
Outcome measure Effect Follow-up timing Sample Sample size Intervention group Comparison group Group difference Effect size Statistical significance
HOME score
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
12 months Denver, Colorado sample 137 parents Mean = 36.66 Mean = 36.64 Mean difference = 0.02 Not available Not statistically significant, p = 0.94
Asthma knowledge score
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
12 months Denver, Colorado sample 150 parents Mean = 5.20 Mean = 4.84 Mean difference = 0.36 Not available Statistically significant, p = 0.04
Cat dander
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
12 months Denver, Colorado sample 140 parents = 0.33 = 0.26 Mean difference = 0.07 HomVEE calculated = 0.20 Not statistically significant, p = 0.25
Cockroach allergen
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
12 months Denver, Colorado sample 140 parents = 0.01 = 0.13 Mean difference = -0.12 HomVEE calculated = -1.62 Statistically significant, p = 0.03
Collaborative relationship score
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
12 months Denver, Colorado sample 146 parents Mean = 6.13 Mean = 5.81 Mean difference = 0.33 Not available Statistically significant, p = 0.04
Dog dander
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
12 months Denver, Colorado sample 141 parents = 0.13 = 0.24 Mean difference = -0.11 HomVEE calculated = -0.45 Not statistically significant, p = -.07
View Revisions