Preparing for Life—Home Visiting Meets HHS Criteria

Model effectiveness research report last updated: 2023

Effects shown in research

Child health

Findings rated high

Preparing for Life—Home Visiting
Show findings details
Outcome measure Effect Follow-up timing Sample Sample size Intervention group Comparison group Group difference Effect size Statistical significance Notes

Child meets recommended number of daily servings for protein, Multiple Imputation results

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

18 months old

High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample

207 children Not reported Not reported Odds ratio = 1.52 Study reported = 0.25

Not statistically significant, p= 0.28

Finding from model using multiple imputation (MI)

Child meets recommended number of daily servings for protein, Multiple Imputation results

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

24 months old

High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample

207 children Not reported Not reported Odds ratio = 2.27 Study reported = 0.50

Statistically significant, p= 0.03

Finding from model using multiple imputation (MI)

Child meets recommended number of daily servings for protein, unweighted

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

12 months old

High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample

165 children Unadjusted proportion = 0.17 Infants Unadjusted proportion = 0.18 Infants Odds ratio = 0.93 HomVEE calculated = -0.04

Not statistically significant, p= 0.87

Child meets recommended number of daily servings for protein, unweighted

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

24 months old

High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample

165 children Unadjusted proportion = 0.33 Infants Unadjusted proportion = 0.18 Infants Odds ratio = 2.30 HomVEE calculated = 0.50

Statistically significant, p= 0.02

View Revisions