Breastfeeding: Heritage and Pride™ (BHP)

Model effectiveness research report last updated: 2024

Effects shown in research

Maternal health

Findings rated high

Breastfeeding: Heritage and Pride™ (BHP)
Show findings details
Outcome measure Effect Follow-up timing Sample Sample size Intervention group Comparison group Group difference Effect size Statistical significance Notes

Maternal lactational amenorrhea status

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

3 months old

BHP and conventional breastfeeding support vs. conventional breastfeeding support RCT, Connecticut, 2003-2004, full sample

135 mother/child dyads Unadjusted proportion = 0.48 Unadjusted proportion = 0.67 Mean difference = -0.19 Study reported = 1.40

Statistically significant, p= <0.05

The reported effect size is the relative risk, which is expressed as a positive value.

View Revisions