HomVEE calculated the effect size based on the study-reported odds ratio.
Guelph Family Health Study (GFHS)
Model effectiveness research report last updated: 2024
Effects shown in research
Positive parenting practices
Findings rated high
Show findings details
Outcome measure | Effect | Follow-up timing | Sample | Sample size | Intervention group | Comparison group | Group difference | Effect size | Statistical significance | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Frequency of family meals over the past week - 7 or more times |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
6 months after enrollment |
Guelph Family Health Study 4 home visits vs. control, Guelph Ontario, 2014-2016, Phase I sample |
28 families | Unadjusted proportion = 0.57 | Unadjusted proportion = 0.55 | Odds ratio = 0.36 | HomVEE calculated = -0.62 | Not statistically significant, p= 0.66 |
Show findings details
Outcome measure | Effect | Follow-up timing | Sample | Sample size | Intervention group | Comparison group | Group difference | Effect size | Statistical significance | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Confusion, Hubbub, and Order Scale (CHAOS), Household chaos |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
18 months after enrollment |
Guelph Family Health Study (4HV) vs. comparison, Canada 2014-2018, Phase I/II sample |
60 families | Unadjusted mean = 30.57 | Unadjusted mean = 33.00 | Mean difference = -2.22 | Not available | Not statistically significant, p= 0.14 |
Negative effect is favorable to the intervention. |
Confusion, Hubbub, and Order Scale (CHAOS), Household chaos |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
6 months after enrollment |
Guelph Family Health Study (4HV) vs. comparison, Canada 2014-2018, Phase I/II sample |
60 families | Unadjusted mean = 30.89 | Unadjusted mean = 31.74 | Mean difference = -0.74 | Not available | Not statistically significant, p= 0.57 |
Negative effect is favorable to the intervention. |