Negative effect is favorable to the intervention.
Promoting First Relationships®—Home Visiting Options
Model effectiveness research report last updated: 2021
Effects shown in research
Reductions in child maltreatment
Findings rated high
783
Promoting First Relationships®—Home Visiting Intervention Model
Show findings details
Outcome measure | Effect | Follow-up timing | Sample | Sample size | Intervention group | Comparison group | Group difference | Effect size | Statistical significance | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CPS-initiated child removals from birth parent |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
15 months post-intervention |
PFR vs. R&R, Washington state 2011-2014 |
211 parent/child dyads | Unadjusted proportion = 0.06 | Unadjusted proportion = 0.13 | Incidence rate ratio = 2.50 | HomVEE = -0.56 | Statistically significant, p= 0.04 |
783
Promoting First Relationships®—Home Visiting Intervention Model
Show findings details
Outcome measure | Effect | Follow-up timing | Sample | Sample size | Intervention group | Comparison group | Group difference | Effect size | Statistical significance | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Permanency |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
Two years post randomization |
PFR vs. EES, one county in Washington state, 2007-2010, full sample |
210 children | Not reported | Not reported | Odds ratio = 1.72 | HomVEE calculated = 0.33 | Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 |
HomVEE calculated the effect size based on the study-reported odds ratio. |
Stability |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
Two years post randomization |
PFR vs. EES, one county in Washington state, 2007-2010, full sample |
210 children | Not reported | Not reported | Odds ratio = 1.19 | HomVEE calculated = 0.11 | Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 |
HomVEE calculated the effect size based on the study-reported odds ratio. |