Promoting First Relationships®—Home Visiting Options

Model effectiveness research report last updated: 2021

Effects shown in research

Reductions in child maltreatment

Findings rated high

Promoting First Relationships®—Home Visiting Intervention Model
Show findings details
Outcome measure Effect Follow-up timing Sample Sample size Intervention group Comparison group Group difference Effect size Statistical significance Notes

CPS-initiated child removals from birth parent

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

15 months post-intervention

PFR vs. R&R, Washington state 2011-2014

211 parent/child dyads Unadjusted proportion = 0.06 Unadjusted proportion = 0.13 Incidence rate ratio = 2.50 HomVEE = -0.56

Statistically significant, p= 0.04

Submitted by user on

Negative effect is favorable to the intervention.

Promoting First Relationships®—Home Visiting Intervention Model
Show findings details
Outcome measure Effect Follow-up timing Sample Sample size Intervention group Comparison group Group difference Effect size Statistical significance Notes

Permanency

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

Two years post randomization

PFR vs. EES, one county in Washington state, 2007-2010, full sample

210 children Not reported Not reported Odds ratio = 1.72 HomVEE calculated = 0.33

Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05

Submitted by barbara on

HomVEE calculated the effect size based on the study-reported odds ratio.

Stability

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

Two years post randomization

PFR vs. EES, one county in Washington state, 2007-2010, full sample

210 children Not reported Not reported Odds ratio = 1.19 HomVEE calculated = 0.11

Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05

Submitted by barbara on

HomVEE calculated the effect size based on the study-reported odds ratio.

View Revisions