Statistical significance is based on HomVEE calculations.
Video-Feedback Intervention to promote Positive Parenting-Sensitive Discipline® (VIPP-SD)
Model effectiveness research report last updated: 2023
Effects shown in research
Positive parenting practices
Findings rated high
588
Video-Feedback Intervention to promote Positive Parenting - (VIPP-SD)
Show findings details
| Outcome measure | Effect | Follow-up timing | Sample | Sample size | Intervention group | Comparison group | Group difference | Effect size | Statistical significance | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Emotional Availability (EA) Scales: Nonhostility |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
1 month after last home visit/telephone call |
VIPP-SD vs. comparison, Portugal, full sample |
43 mother/child dyads | Unadjusted mean = 5.44 | Unadjusted mean = 5.25 | Mean difference = 0.19 | HomVEE calculated = 0.24 | Not statistically significant, p= >.05 |
HomVEE calculated effect size from the difference-in-differences estimate |
Emotional Availability (EA) Scales: Nonintrusiveness |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
1 month after last home visit/telephone call |
VIPP-SD vs. comparison, Portugal, full sample |
43 mother/child dyads | Unadjusted mean = 4.59 | Unadjusted mean = 4.02 | Mean difference = 0.57 | HomVEE calculated = 1.08 | Statistically significant, p= <.001 |
HomVEE calculated effect size from the difference-in-differences estimate |
Emotional Availability (EA) Scales: Positive parenting |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
1 month after last home visit/telephone call |
VIPP-SD vs. comparison, Portugal, full sample |
43 mother/child dyads | Unadjusted mean = 4.85 | Unadjusted mean = 4.60 | Mean difference = 0.25 | HomVEE calculated = 0.63 | Statistically significant, p= <.05 |
HomVEE calculated effect size from the difference-in-differences estimate |
Emotional Availability (EA) Scales: Sensitivity |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
1 month after last home visit/telephone call |
VIPP-SD vs. comparison, Portugal, full sample |
43 mother/child dyads | Unadjusted mean = 4.74 | Unadjusted mean = 4.45 | Mean difference = 0.29 | HomVEE calculated = 0.42 | Not statistically significant, p= >.05 |
HomVEE calculated effect size from the difference-in-differences estimate |
Emotional Availability (EA) Scales: Structuring |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
1 month after last home visit/telephone call |
VIPP-SD vs. comparison, Portugal, full sample |
43 mother/child dyads | Unadjusted mean = 4.63 | Unadjusted mean = 4.65 | Mean difference = -0.02 | HomVEE calculated = 0.38 | Not statistically significant, p= >.05 |
HomVEE calculated effect size from the difference-in-differences estimate |
Family Environment Scale (FES): Cohesion |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
1 month after last home visit/telephone call |
VIPP-SD vs. comparison, Portugal, full sample |
43 mothers | Unadjusted mean = 43.72 | Unadjusted mean = 38.05 | Mean difference = 5.67 | HomVEE calculated = 0.89 | Statistically significant, p= <.05 |
HomVEE calculated effect size from the difference-in-differences estimate |
Family Environment Scale (FES): Conflict |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
1 month after last home visit/telephone call |
VIPP-SD vs. comparison, Portugal, full sample |
43 mothers | Unadjusted mean = 39.86 | Unadjusted mean = 37.71 | Mean difference = 2.15 | HomVEE calculated = 0.43 | Not statistically significant, p= >.05 |
HomVEE calculated effect size from the difference-in-differences estimate |
Family Environment Scale (FES): Expressiveness |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
1 month after last home visit/telephone call |
VIPP-SD vs. comparison, Portugal, full sample |
43 mothers | Unadjusted mean = 39.64 | Unadjusted mean = 40.48 | Mean difference = -0.84 | HomVEE calculated = 0.08 | Not statistically significant, p= >.05 |
HomVEE calculated effect size from the difference-in-differences estimate |
Family Environment Scale (FES): Family relational functioning |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
1 month after last home visit/telephone call |
VIPP-SD vs. comparison, Portugal, full sample |
43 mothers | Unadjusted mean = 41.08 | Unadjusted mean = 38.75 | Mean difference = 2.33 | HomVEE calculated = 0.57 | Statistically significant, p= <.05 |
HomVEE calculated effect size from the difference-in-differences estimate |
588
Video-Feedback Intervention to promote Positive Parenting - (VIPP-SD)
Show findings details
| Outcome measure | Effect | Follow-up timing | Sample | Sample size | Intervention group | Comparison group | Group difference | Effect size | Statistical significance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maternal Attitudes Towards Sensitive Discipline | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
1 year after enrollment | VIPP-SD vs. comparison, Netherlands 2001-2003, full sample | 237 mothers | Unadjusted mean = 60.71 | Unadjusted mean = 57.37 | Mean difference = 3.34 | HomVEE calculated = 0.28 | Statistically significant, p <.05 |
| Maternal Attitudes Towards Sensitivity | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
1 year after enrollment | VIPP-SD vs. comparison, Netherlands 2001-2003, full sample | 237 mothers | Unadjusted mean = 65.01 | Unadjusted mean = 59.24 | Mean difference = 5.77 | HomVEE calculated = 0.58 | Statistically significant, p <.01 |
| Maternal Discipline: Positive Discipline | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
1 year after enrollment | VIPP-SD vs. comparison, Netherlands 2001-2003, full sample | 237 mothers | Unadjusted mean = 0.35 | Unadjusted mean = -0.36 | Median difference = 0.71 | HomVEE calculated = 0.36 | Statistically significant, p <.01 |
609
Video-Feedback Intervention to promote Positive Parenting (VIPP) British Autism Study of Infant Siblings - (iBASIS-VIPP)
Show findings details
| Outcome measure | Effect | Follow-up timing | Sample | Sample size | Intervention group | Comparison group | Group difference | Effect size | Statistical significance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Manchester Assessment of Caregiver-Infant Interaction (MACI): Caregiver non-directiveness |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
5 months |
iBASIS-VIPP vs. usual care RCT, United Kingdom, 2011-2012 |
53 families | Unadjusted mean = 4.67 | Unadjusted mean = 3.92 | Mean difference = 0.75 | Study reported = 0.81 | Statistically significant, p= <0.05 |
Manchester Assessment of Caregiver-Infant Interaction (MACI): Caregiver sensitive responding |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
5 months |
iBASIS-VIPP vs. usual care RCT, United Kingdom, 2011-2012 |
53 families | Unadjusted mean = 4.30 | Unadjusted mean = 4.58 | Mean difference = -0.28 | Study reported = -0.06 | Not statistically significant, p= >0.05 |
Manchester Assessment of Caregiver-Infant Interaction (MACI): Dyadic mutuality |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
5 months |
iBASIS-VIPP vs. usual care RCT, United Kingdom, 2011-2012 |
53 families | Unadjusted mean = 3.22 | Unadjusted mean = 3.46 | Mean difference = -0.24 | Study reported = 0.05 | Not statistically significant, p= >0.05 |
610
Video-Feedback Intervention to Promote Positive Parenting - VIPP-AUTI
Show findings details
| Outcome measure | Effect | Follow-up timing | Sample | Sample size | Intervention group | Comparison group | Group difference | Effect size | Statistical significance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Parental Emotional Availability Scales (EAS): Non-intrusiveness |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
Immediate post-intervention |
VIPP-AUTI vs. usual care, 2015, the Netherlands, full sample |
76 caregivers | Unadjusted mean = 4.06 | Unadjusted mean = 3.94 | Mean difference = 0.12 | HomVEE calculated = 0.51 | Statistically significant, p= 0.04 |
Parental Emotional Availability Scales (EAS): Sensitivity |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
Immediate post-intervention |
VIPP-AUTI vs. usual care, 2015, the Netherlands, full sample |
76 caregivers | Unadjusted mean = 6.34 | Unadjusted mean = 6.36 | Mean difference = -0.02 | HomVEE calculated = 0.26 | Not statistically significant, p= 0.56 |
Parental Emotional Availability Scales (EAS): Structuring |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
Immediate post-intervention |
VIPP-AUTI vs. usual care, 2015, the Netherlands, full sample |
76 caregivers | Unadjusted mean = 3.74 | Unadjusted mean = 3.82 | Mean difference = -0.08 | HomVEE calculated = 0.05 | Not statistically significant, p= 0.59 |
833
Video-Feedback Intervention to promote Positive Parenting (VIPP)
Show findings details
| Outcome measure | Effect | Follow-up timing | Sample | Sample size | Intervention group | Comparison group | Group difference | Effect size | Statistical significance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ainsworth Maternal Sensitivity Scale |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
11 months old |
VIPP vs. comparison, Netherlands, full sample |
81 mothers | Unadjusted mean = 5.35 | Unadjusted mean = 4.81 | Mean difference = 0.54 | HomVEE calculated = 0.53 | Statistically significant, p= 0.03 |
Ainsworth Maternal Sensitivity Scale |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
13 months old |
VIPP vs. comparison, Netherlands, full sample |
81 mothers | Unadjusted mean = 6.03 | Unadjusted mean = 5.27 | Mean difference = 0.76 | HomVEE calculated = 0.46 | Not statistically significant, p= 0.054 |
833
Video-Feedback Intervention to promote Positive Parenting (VIPP)
Show findings details
| Outcome measure | Effect | Follow-up timing | Sample | Sample size | Intervention group | Comparison group | Group difference | Effect size | Statistical significance | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Emotional Availability Scales (EAS): Maternal sensitivity scale |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
40 months old |
VIPP vs. comparison, Netherlands, full sample |
77 mothers | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Study reported = 0.04 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.88 |
Authors' reported effect size is Cohen's d |