Frequently Asked Questions

Track 1 early childhood home visiting models are models that HomVEE has not yet found to be evidence-based. Track 2 models are models that HomVEE has already found to be evidence-based. 

HomVEE treats Track 1 and Track 2 models differently. 

HomVEE reviews Track 1 models to determine if they meet HHS criteria for evidence of effectiveness (see FAQ “How does HomVEE apply HHS criteria for evidence-based early childhood service delivery models?” ). During each review for a Track 1 model, HomVEE re-reviews all previously-reviewed research about that model using the latest HomVEE standards. This may result in changes to a manuscript’s rating or eligibility. If a study manuscript no longer meets standards, HomVEE may remove the findings from the website. Based on the most recent review results, HomVEE determines whether a Track 1 model meets the criteria to be evidence-based. 

HomVEE does not re-review Track 2 models but periodically updates their model reports to include the most recent research. Each update uses the current standards to review new research identified since the last update, but does not re-review research. That means that some research on the HomVEE website about Track 2 models might no longer be eligible for review under the latest procedures and standards. Importantly, HomVEE does not reassess Track 2 models against the HHS criteria when it updates their reports. That means Track 2 models retain their evidence-based status.

All research, including research that includes virtual service delivery, is subject to the same standards and procedures. HomVEE groups together all research on a model to apply the HHS criteria unless the model developer indicates that particular manuscripts are research on an adaptation of their model.

HomVEE assesses whether each model meets the HHS criteria for an “evidence-based early childhood service delivery model.” To operationalize the HHS criteria related to studies, and because study findings may be reported across several manuscripts, HomVEE rates manuscripts based on the highest-rated finding reported in that manuscript. Any high- or moderate-rated finding from a study about a model is considered as part of the evidence base for that model. Notably, for models with research solely from either randomized controlled trial (RCT) or single-case design (SCD) studies, additional criteria apply (see the HHS criteria). For example, the additional criteria for RCTs to be from peer-reviewed journal articles and to have sustained findings align with MIECHV Program statutory requirements. The HHS criteria for an evidence-based model have no additional requirements for regression discontinuity design (RDD) or non-experimental comparison group design (NED) studies.

A model may be evidence based on the strength of subgroup findings alone only if the research about it satisfies all of the subgroup criteria.

For details, please see the HHS criteria for evidence-based early childhood home visiting service delivery models.