Childhood Asthma Prevention Study (CAPS)

Placeholder for model effectiveness

Placeholder for manuscripts count 1

Placeholder for manuscripts count 2

Target Population

Placeholder for results from well-defined research

Skip-to content here...

Description field here

Related models list

Where to find out more - can be model view mode

Here is the raw field value

44

Here is the rendered field

OldID
44

Model effectiveness research report last updated: 2012

Effectiveness

Evidence of model effectiveness

Title General population Tribal population Domains with favorable effects
Childhood Asthma Prevention Study (CAPS) Does not meet HHS criteria because the findings from high- or moderate-rated effectiveness studies of the model do not meet all required criteria. Does not meet HHS criteria for tribal population because the model has not been evaluated with a tribal population.
  • Positive parenting practices,

Model description

The Childhood Asthma Prevention Study (CAPS) was designed to reduce children’s wheezing-related morbidity by reducing household allergens and increasing caregiver illness-management skills. CAPS participants were low-income families living in the Denver metropolitan area with children between 9 and 24 months old who had experienced at least three wheezing episodes. Nurses trained as home visitors addressed allergen and tobacco smoke reduction, as well as psychosocial factors of illness management, including parental knowledge, parent-child relationships, and caregiver mental health. Home visitors guided and supported caregivers’ efforts to achieve health-promotion goals through education, problem solving, and referrals for additional services. CAPS consisted of 18 home visits delivered over the course of a year.

View Revisions

Extent of evidence

2 Manuscripts

Eligible for review

2 Manuscripts

Rated high or
moderate

For more information, see the research database. For more information on the criteria used to rate research, please see details of HomVEE’s methods and standards.

View Revisions

Summary of findings

To see details on each manuscript HomVEE reviewed in well-designed research, click on the manuscript counts in the table.

Favorable:
A finding showing a statistically significant impact on an outcome measure in a direction that is beneficial for children and parents.

No effect:
Findings are not statistically significant.

Unfavorable:
A finding showing a statistically significant impact on an outcome measure in a direction that may indicate potential harm to children and/or parents.

Outcomes Manuscripts Favorable Findings No Effects Findings Unfavorable Findings
Child development and school readiness Not measured - - -
Child health View 2 Manuscripts 0 4 0
Family economic self-sufficiency Not measured - - -
Linkages and referrals Not measured - - -
Maternal health View 1 Manuscript 0 1 0
Positive parenting practices View 1 Manuscript 3 3 0
Reductions in child maltreatment Not measured - - -
Reductions in juvenile delinquency, family violence, and crime Not measured - - -
View Revisions

Criteria established by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

Information based on comprehensive review of all high- and moderate-rated manuscripts
CriterionCriterion descriptionCriterion met?
1High- or moderate-quality impact study?Yes
2Across high- or moderate-quality studies, favorable impacts in at least two outcome domains within one sample OR the same domain for at least two non-overlapping samples?No
3Favorable impacts on full sample?Yes
4Any favorable impacts on outcome measures sustained at least 12 months after model enrollment?
Reported for all research but only required for RCTs.
Yes
5One or more favorable, statistically significant impact reported in a peer-reviewed journal?
Reported for all research but only required for RCTs.
Yes
View Revisions

Implementation

Model implementation profile last updated: 2014

Theoretical approach

There are no definitive risk factors for the development of childhood asthma. Therefore, many asthma-related primary prevention programs focus on children whose parents have asthma. As children with asthmatic parents represent only a small proportion of the total population of children with asthma, the Childhood Asthma Prevention Study (CAPS) aimed to intervene with a broader range of children at risk of developing asthma, namely young children who had experienced wheezing episodes. In addition to the standard allergen-reduction efforts undertaken in other programs, the CAPS model also targeted the psychosocial factors that might affect successful illness management, such as parental knowledge of health promotion activities and caregiver mental health issues.

View Revisions

Implementation support availability

CAPS was designed and implemented by staff from National Jewish Health (formerly the National Jewish Medical and Research Center).

No information was available about technical assistance.

View Revisions

Intended population

CAPS served young children living in low-income households, who were between 9 and 24 months and had at least three wheezing episodes that had been brought to the attention of a physician.

View Revisions

Targeted outcomes

The intervention was designed to reduce children’s wheezing-related morbidity by reducing household allergens and increasing caregiver illness-management capabilities.

View Revisions

Model services

CAPS provided home-based services that addressed allergen and environmental tobacco smoke reduction, illness management, parent-child relationships, and caregiver mental health. The home visitors guided and supported caregivers’ efforts to achieve health promotion goals through education, problem solving, and referrals for additional services.

Caregivers received videos addressing asthma prevention and management, and handouts on topics relevant to their needs (such as child care or interactions with medical care providers).

View Revisions

Model intensity and length

The intervention consisted of 18 home visits delivered over the course of a year. No information was available about the length of the visits.

View Revisions

Adaptations and enhancements

No information was available about model adaptations or enhancements.

View Revisions

Organizational requirements

No information was available about the type or characteristics of organizations that could implement the model.

No information was available about whether the model specified any guidelines that implementing programs or home visitors were required to meet on an ongoing basis.

View Revisions

Staffing requirements

CAPS was implemented by nurse home visitors.

The home visitors who implemented CAPS had a bachelor of science degree in nursing and experience with community outreach.

There was no information available on supervision requirements.

Home visitors received training in asthma prevention and management. No information was available about whether home visitors were required to participate in ongoing professional development.

View Revisions

Where to find out more

Mary D. Klinnert, Ph.D.
National Jewish Health
1400 Jackson St., G320
Denver, CO 80206

View Revisions

HomVEE requests input and feedback from the model developers on their profiles. The information in this implementation profile reflects feedback, if provided, from this model’s developer as of the above date. HomVEE reserves the right to edit the profile for clarity and consistency. The description of the implementation of the model(s) here may differ from how the model(s) was implemented in the manuscripts reviewed to determine this model’s evidence of effectiveness. Model developers are encouraged to notify HomVEE of any changes to their contact information on this page.