Promoting Parental Skills and Enhancing Attachment in Early Childhood (CAPEDP) Trial
Model effectiveness research report last updated: 2019
Effectiveness
Evidence of model effectiveness
Title | General population | Tribal population | Domains with favorable effects |
---|---|---|---|
Promoting Parental Skills and Enhancing Attachment in Early Childhood (CAPEDP) Trial | Does not meet HHS criteria because the findings from high- or moderate-rated effectiveness studies of the model do not meet all required criteria. | Does not meet HHS criteria for tribal population because the model has not been evaluated with a tribal population. |
|
Model description
The Parental Skills and Attachment in Early Childhood: Reduction of Risks Linked to Mental Health Problems and Promotion of Resilience Project (CAPEDP) was a demonstration project in France, implemented from 2006 to 2011. CAPEDP enrolled pregnant women who were younger than 26 years old and had one or more of the following risk factors: had less than 12 years of education, qualified for free health care based on low-income status, or intended to raise the child in the absence of the father. The model was designed to promote infant mental health by addressing postnatal maternal depression, improving parenting skills, and promoting healthy mother-child attachment. Psychologists provided home visits that were guided by a series of six DVDs, brochures covering a variety of health and mental health topics, and video recordings of the mother-child interactions. CAPEDP offered families 44 home visits from the third trimester of the mother’s pregnancy to the child’s second birthday.
Extent of evidence
For more information, see the research database. For more information on the criteria used to rate research, please see details of HomVEE’s methods and standards.
Summary of findings
To see details on each manuscript HomVEE reviewed in well-designed research, click on the manuscript counts in the table.
Favorable:
A finding showing a statistically significant impact on an outcome measure in a direction that is beneficial for children and parents.
No effect:
Findings are not statistically significant.
Unfavorable:
A finding showing a statistically significant impact on an outcome measure in a direction that may indicate potential harm to children and/or parents.
Outcomes | Manuscripts | Favorable Findings | No Effects Findings | Unfavorable Findings |
---|---|---|---|---|
Child development and school readiness | Not measured | - | - | - |
Child health | Not measured | - | - | - |
Family economic self-sufficiency | Not measured | - | - | - |
Linkages and referrals | Not measured | - | - | - |
Maternal health | View 1 Manuscript | 0 | 1 | 0 |
Positive parenting practices | Not measured | - | - | - |
Reductions in child maltreatment | Not measured | - | - | - |
Reductions in juvenile delinquency, family violence, and crime | Not measured | - | - | - |
Implementation
Model implementation profile last updated: 2019
Theoretical approach
In response to an increased number of children living in disadvantaged environments being referred for mental health care, the Parental Skills and Attachment in Early Childhood: Reduction of Risks Linked to Mental Health Problems and Promotion of Resilience Project (CAPEDP) was developed to promote infant mental health and reduce the incidence of infant mental health problems. CAPEDP drew on the framework from the Nurse-Family Partnership (NFP) model and Integrated Services for Perinatal Health and Early Childhood, a Canadian adaptation of the NFP. The model was based on Bandura’s self-efficacy theory, Bronfenbrenner’s ecological model of human development, and Bowlby’s attachment theory. CAPEDP was implemented within and designed to supplement the French system of free public mother-child support and prevention services.
Implementation support availability
CAPEDP was a demonstration project* funded by the French National Ministry of Health, the French National Institute for Prevention and Health Education, the French National Institute for Health and Medical Research, and the French Public Health Research Institute. It was implemented from 2006 to 2011 by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, the main public university hospital in Paris. No ongoing technical assistance is available.
*The information in this profile represents how the model was implemented during the demonstration trial.
Intended population
The intended population included mothers who were younger than 26 years old, were less than 27 weeks pregnant, and spoke French fluently enough to actively participate in CAPEDP. Eligible participants also had to meet one or more of the following risk factors: had less than 12 years of education, qualified for free health care based on low-income status, or intended to raise the child in the absence of the father.
Targeted outcomes
The model was designed to promote infant mental health by addressing postpartum maternal depression, improving parenting skills, and promoting healthy mother-child attachment.Model services
Psychologists provided home visits that focused on four themes: (1) the family and its social and cultural network, (2) the mother’s needs and health, (3) creating a safe and stimulating environment for the baby, and (4) the baby’s development. The specific content of the visits varied over the course of the intervention period (with different content offered in the prenatal, 0 to 6 months, 6 to 15 months, and 15 to 24 months periods). Home visitors tailored the visits to the varying needs of each family.
The home visitor recorded a video of the mother and child interacting during daily routines, such as bath and meal time. During the following visit, the home visitor and mother discussed the video together and the home visitor helped the mother reflect on her parenting practices.
To guide the visits, the home visitors used (1) a series of six DVDs on topics such as pregnancy, child care, and child development; and (2) a set of 39 brochures covering a variety of health and mental health topics related to promoting parent-child relationships.
Model intensity and length
CAPEDP offered families 44 home visits from the third trimester of the mother’s pregnancy to the child’s second birthday. That span of visits was organized into four periods: 6 visits during the prenatal period, 8 visits during the child’s first three months, 15 visits between 4 and 12 months of age, and 15 visits between 13 and 24 months.The length of each home visit was at least 1.5 hours.
Adaptations and enhancements
No information was available on any adaptations or enhancements made to CAPEDP.Organizational requirements
CAPEDP was implemented by home visitors from well-baby clinics.
No information was available about ongoing fidelity guidelines that implementing programs or home visitors were required to meet.
Staffing requirements
The following staff were involved in implementing the model: home visitors, a clinical supervisor, a project manager who monitored implementation fidelity, and the principal investigator.
The home visitors were clinical psychologists. The supervisor was a child psychiatrist with perinatal and home visiting experience. The supervisor had knowledge of attachment theory, early development, and early psychopathology; and clinical expertise in postpartum depression and parental mental health disorders.
A senior clinician provided weekly individual supervision. The principal investigator met with the home visitors as a group every two weeks. The principal investigator also established a hotline for questions. The project manager monitored home visitors’ fidelity to the intervention manual.
CAPEDP required home visitors to participate in a six-day pre-service training. No information was available on the pre-service training requirements for supervisors. Ongoing training and support on how to use the video recordings of parent-child interactions was provided.
Where to find out more
Antoine Guédeney
Department of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
Hôpital Bichat Claude Bernard124 blv NEY
Paris, France 75018
Email: antoine.guedeney@bch.aphp.fr
HomVEE requests input and feedback from the model developers on their profiles. The information in this implementation profile reflects feedback, if provided, from this model’s developer as of the above date. HomVEE reserves the right to edit the profile for clarity and consistency. The description of the implementation of the model(s) here may differ from how the model(s) was implemented in the manuscripts reviewed to determine this model’s evidence of effectiveness. Model developers are encouraged to notify HomVEE of any changes to their contact information on this page.