Resources, Education, and Care in the Home (REACH)

Placeholder for model effectiveness

Placeholder for manuscripts count 1

Placeholder for manuscripts count 2

Target Population

Placeholder for results from well-defined research

Skip-to content here...

Description field here

Related models list

Where to find out more - can be model view mode

Here is the raw field value

41

Here is the rendered field

OldID
41

Model effectiveness research report last updated: 2011

Effectiveness

Evidence of model effectiveness

Title General population Tribal population Domains with favorable effects
Resources, Education, and Care in the Home (REACH) Does not meet HHS criteria because the findings from high- or moderate-rated effectiveness studies of the model do not meet all required criteria. Does not meet HHS criteria for tribal population because the model has not been evaluated with a tribal population.
  • Child health,

Model description

The Resources, Education and Care in the Home (REACH) program was a multiagency service model designed to prevent and reduce post-neonatal morbidity and mortality in high-need communities. REACH targeted infants born to low-income teenage mothers, mothers with limited or no access to prenatal care, infants and mothers discharged early from the hospital, and families with psychosocial problems. A hospital-based registered nurse case manager coordinated mothers’ contacts with participating REACH agencies, made referrals to social service organizations, and provided counseling. Families typically received home visits when children were two weeks; six to eight weeks; and 4, 8, and 12 months old, with additional visits as necessary. Home visitors provided parent education; conducted infant, parent, and environmental assessments; and collected information on child health and development. 

View Revisions

Extent of evidence

3 Manuscripts

Eligible for review

1 Manuscript

Rated high or
moderate

For more information, see the research database. For more information on the criteria used to rate research, please see details of HomVEE’s methods and standards.

View Revisions

Summary of findings

To see details on each manuscript HomVEE reviewed in well-designed research, click on the manuscript counts in the table.

Favorable:
A finding showing a statistically significant impact on an outcome measure in a direction that is beneficial for children and parents.

No effect:
Findings are not statistically significant.

Unfavorable:
A finding showing a statistically significant impact on an outcome measure in a direction that may indicate potential harm to children and/or parents.

Outcomes Manuscripts Favorable Findings No Effects Findings Unfavorable Findings
Child development and school readiness View 1 Manuscript 0 1 0
Child health View 1 Manuscript 1 3 0
Family economic self-sufficiency Not measured - - -
Linkages and referrals Not measured - - -
Maternal health Not measured - - -
Positive parenting practices Not measured - - -
Reductions in child maltreatment Not measured - - -
Reductions in juvenile delinquency, family violence, and crime Not measured - - -
View Revisions

Criteria established by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

Information based on comprehensive review of all high- and moderate-rated manuscripts
CriterionCriterion descriptionCriterion met?
1High- or moderate-quality impact study?Yes
2Across high- or moderate-quality studies, favorable impacts in at least two outcome domains within one sample OR the same domain for at least two non-overlapping samples?No
3Favorable impacts on full sample?Yes
4Any favorable impacts on outcome measures sustained at least 12 months after model enrollment?
Reported for all research but only required for RCTs.
No
5One or more favorable, statistically significant impact reported in a peer-reviewed journal?
Reported for all research but only required for RCTs.
Yes
View Revisions

Implementation

Model implementation profile last updated: 2011

Theoretical approach

No information about the theoretical approach for the Resources, Education and Care in the Home (REACH) model was available.

View Revisions

Implementation support availability

REACH was a multiagency service model developed by faculty and staff of the University of Illinois at Chicago and developed and implemented in collaboration with the Chicago Department of Public Health (CDPH), the Chicago Visiting Nurses Association (VNA), and Westside Future, a community-based social service agency.

No information about technical assistance was available.

View Revisions

Intended population

REACH served infants born to low-income teenage mothers, mothers with limited or no prenatal care, infants and mothers discharged early from the hospital, and families with psychosocial problems. Most REACH families resided in densely populated, low-income communities with public housing units.

View Revisions

Targeted outcomes

REACH was designed to prevent and reduce infant morbidity and mortality in high-need, high-risk Chicago communities. View Revisions

Model services

REACH included case management provided by a hospital-based registered nurse case manager who coordinated mothers’ contacts with participating REACH agencies, made referrals to social service organizations, and provided counseling.

The first home visit occurred two weeks after hospital discharge and was conducted by a two-person team that included a community health advocate (CHA) and the registered nurse case manager. Each mother received a physical and psychological assessment and each infant received a physical and developmental assessment. The team also completed an environmental assessment of the home and observed mother-child interaction. Families with no identified acute issues during the first home visit received three subsequent visits at the infant’s age of six to eight weeks, 4 months, and 8 months. A public health nurse or aide from the CDPH collected information on the infant’s health and development. A final visit occurred at 12 months, during which the two-person registered nurse case manager and CHA team returned and conducted a physical and developmental examination of the infant, reviewed family program records, and verified immunizations.

If problems were identified during the first home visit, the family was referred to VNA. VNA conducted a home visit within seven days to address the identified issues; these families did not receive a visit at six to eight weeks. After the issues had been addressed, the family was referred back to the nurse case manager for reassignment to the standard program schedule.

Telephone or mail contact was used to check the outcome of referrals, address concerns voiced by mothers, confirm appointments and follow up regarding missed appointments, verify immunization status, and verify the most recent address. Monthly newsletters mailed to mothers provided age-appropriate information and reminded them to contact staff if they planned to move.

No information was available about the curriculum used for this model.

View Revisions

Model intensity and length

REACH required home visits at the ages of two weeks; six to eight weeks; and 4, 8, and 12 months, with additional visits as necessary.

View Revisions

Adaptations and enhancements

REACH has evolved into a program called REACH Futures, which gives the community health worker a greater role in service provision and interaction with the family as part of a nurse-managed team.

View Revisions

Organizational requirements

REACH was implemented in collaboration with the CDPH, the Chicago VNA, and Westside Future, a community-based social service agency.

No information was available about whether the model specified any guidelines that implementing programs or home visitors were required to meet on an ongoing basis.

View Revisions

Staffing requirements

REACH was a multiagency model that used staff from several different organizations. Teams of registered nurses and community workers trained as CHAs conducted the first home visit. Subsequent visits were conducted by public health nurses or aides from the CDPH or by nurses from VNA.

VNA nursing staff specialized in home management of acute problems. CHAs were typically employed by a hospital and were usually recruited from the same or similar community areas as program participants.

No information on supervision requirements was available.

No information on pre-service staff training or ongoing professional development requirements was available.

View Revisions

Where to find out more

Cynthia Barnes-Boyd, Ph.D., R.N., FAAN
University of Illinois at Chicago
Mile Square Health Center
2045 West Washington
M/C 698
Chicago, IL 60612

View Revisions

HomVEE requests input and feedback from the model developers on their profiles. The information in this implementation profile reflects feedback, if provided, from this model’s developer as of the above date. HomVEE reserves the right to edit the profile for clarity and consistency. The description of the implementation of the model(s) here may differ from how the model(s) was implemented in the manuscripts reviewed to determine this model’s evidence of effectiveness. Model developers are encouraged to notify HomVEE of any changes to their contact information on this page.