Reductions in juvenile delinquency, family violence, and crime

In brief

Overview

Most early childhood home visiting models included in the HomVEE review do not have an explicit goal of reducing juvenile delinquency, family violence, and crime. Some, however, seek to reduce risky parental behaviors in ways that are similar to those of models that explicitly target these goals. For example, some models try to address parental mental health, self-efficacy, and self-sufficiency either directly or through linkages with other service providers. Provision of these services may affect families’ long-term well-being and reduce the likelihood of adult criminal behavior and family violence. Many early childhood home visiting models provide parenting education and parent-child interaction activities, which may improve parents’ capacity to manage their children’s behaviors and set children on a trajectory in which they are less likely to engage in later risky behaviors such as juvenile delinquency.

Measurement considerations

In this domain, outcomes may include domestic and family violence, interaction with the justice system by the mother or by a youth who received home visiting services during early childhood, or school suspensions or expulsions for one of these youth. Outcome measures in this domain include the incidence of parent and youth antisocial behavior, based on archived data from state records, as well as parent, teacher, and youth self-report of antisocial behaviors, and are not standardized (normed). For example, HomVEE has classified the Conflict Tactics Scale (CTS), a measure that assesses family violence, intimate partner violence and child maltreatment, as a secondary measure in this domain.

Review of research

The HomVEE review examined the research on 50 early childhood home visiting models with manuscripts published in 1979 through 2020. (HomVEE counts related versions, commonly referred to as adaptations, together in this section and in the table below. More information is available in the procedures and standards handbook.) Of the 5 models with manuscripts about high- or moderate-quality studies that measured outcomes in this domain, 3 had favorable effects.

Summary of findings

The effects shown in the research are grouped into four categories: (1) favorable, (2) no effect, (3) unfavorable or ambiguous, and (4) not measured. Results for models that only have low-rated research are listed as “not applicable.” For more information on these categories please read the procedures and standards handbook. Only results from manuscripts that receive a moderate or high rating are considered below. This table includes manuscripts links to more information on the model’s effectiveness, implementation, and details on findings in this domain.

Effects shown in research — Reductions in juvenile delinquency, family violence, and crime domain

Displaying 1 - 56 of 56

Summary of findings across models for the reductions in juvenile delinquency, family violence, and crime outcome domain
Model	Meets HHS criteria	Findings	For more information
Arizona Health Start Program	Meets HHS criteria? No	Findings Not measured	For more information Model effectiveness Implementation
Attachment and Biobehavioral Catch-Up (ABC) -Infant	Meets HHS criteria? Yes	Findings Not measured	For more information Model effectiveness Implementation
Child First	Meets HHS criteria? Yes	Findings Not measured	For more information Model effectiveness Implementation
Child Parent Enrichment Project (CPEP)	Meets HHS criteria? No	Findings Not measured	For more information Model effectiveness Implementation
Childhood Asthma Prevention Study (CAPS)	Meets HHS criteria? No	Findings Not measured	For more information Model effectiveness Implementation
Computer-Assisted Motivational Intervention (CAMI)	Meets HHS criteria? No	Findings Not measured	For more information Model effectiveness Implementation
Early Head Start Home-Based Option	Meets HHS criteria? Yes	Findings Not measured	For more information Model effectiveness Implementation
Early Intervention Program for Adolescent Mothers Implementation support is not currently available for the model as reviewed.	Meets HHS criteria? Yes	Findings Not measured	For more information Model effectiveness Implementation
Early Start (New Zealand)	Meets HHS criteria? Yes	Findings Favorable: 0 No effect: 1 Unfavorable or ambiguous: 0	For more information Model effectiveness Implementation Outcome details
Early Steps to School Success™—Home Visiting	Meets HHS criteria? No	Findings Not measured	For more information Model effectiveness Implementation
Even Start-Home Visiting (Birth to Age 5) Implementation support is not currently available for the model as reviewed.	Meets HHS criteria? No	Findings Not applicable	For more information Model effectiveness Implementation
Family Check-Up^® For Children	Meets HHS criteria? Yes	Findings Not measured	For more information Model effectiveness Implementation
Family Connections (Birth to Age 5)	Meets HHS criteria? No	Findings Not applicable	For more information Model effectiveness Implementation
Family Connects	Meets HHS criteria? Yes	Findings Not measured	For more information Model effectiveness Implementation
Family Spirit^®	Meets HHS criteria? Yes	Findings Not measured	For more information Model effectiveness Implementation
Following Baby Back Home (FBBH)	Meets HHS criteria? No	Findings Not measured	For more information Model effectiveness Implementation
Health Access Nurturing Development Services (HANDS) Program	Meets HHS criteria? Yes	Findings Not measured	For more information Model effectiveness Implementation
HealthConnect One's^® Community-Based Doula Program	Meets HHS criteria? No	Findings Not measured	For more information Model effectiveness Implementation
Healthy Beginnings	Meets HHS criteria? Yes	Findings Not measured	For more information Model effectiveness Implementation
Healthy Families America (HFA)^®	Meets HHS criteria? Yes	Findings Favorable: 3 No effect: 26 Unfavorable or ambiguous: 0	For more information Model effectiveness Implementation Outcome details
Healthy Start-Home Visiting HHS has determined that Healthy Start is not eligible for review by HomVEE because it is a federal grant program and not a home visiting model. Information on Healthy Start has been removed from the website.	Meets HHS criteria? No	Findings Not measured	For more information Model effectiveness Implementation
Healthy Steps (National Evaluation 1996 Protocol) This report focuses on Healthy Steps as implemented in the 1996 evaluation. HHS has determined that home visiting is not the primary service delivery strategy and the model does not meet current requirements for MIECHV program implementation.	Meets HHS criteria? Yes	Findings Favorable: 0 No effect: 1 Unfavorable or ambiguous: 0	For more information Model effectiveness Implementation Outcome details
Home Instruction for Parents of Preschool Youngsters (HIPPY)^®	Meets HHS criteria? Yes	Findings Not measured	For more information Model effectiveness Implementation
Home-Start	Meets HHS criteria? No	Findings Not measured	For more information Model effectiveness Implementation
HOMEBUILDERS (Birth to Age 5)^®	Meets HHS criteria? No	Findings Not applicable	For more information Model effectiveness Implementation
Intervention Nurses Start Infants Growing on Healthy Trajectories (INSIGHT)	Meets HHS criteria? No	Findings Not measured	For more information Model effectiveness Implementation
Maternal Early Childhood Sustained Home-Visiting Program (MECSH)	Meets HHS criteria? Yes	Findings Not measured	For more information Model effectiveness Implementation
Maternal Infant Health Outreach Worker (MIHOW)^®	Meets HHS criteria? No	Findings Not measured	For more information Model effectiveness Implementation
Maternal Infant Health Program (MIHP)	Meets HHS criteria? Yes	Findings Not measured	For more information Model effectiveness Implementation
Minding the Baby^® Home Visiting (MTB-HV)	Meets HHS criteria? Yes	Findings Not measured	For more information Model effectiveness Implementation
MOM Program	Meets HHS criteria? No	Findings Not measured	For more information Model effectiveness Implementation
Mothers’ Advocates in the Community (MOSAIC)	Meets HHS criteria? No	Findings Not measured	For more information Model effectiveness Implementation
New Forest Parenting Programme (NFPP)	Meets HHS criteria? No	Findings Not measured	For more information Model effectiveness Implementation
North Carolina Baby Love Maternal Outreach Workers Program Implementation support is not currently available for the model as reviewed.	Meets HHS criteria? No	Findings Not measured	For more information Model effectiveness Implementation
Nurse-Family Partnership (NFP)^®	Meets HHS criteria? Yes	Findings Favorable: 8 No effect: 57 Unfavorable or ambiguous: 0	For more information Model effectiveness Implementation Outcome details
Nurses for Newborns^®	Meets HHS criteria? No	Findings Not measured	For more information Model effectiveness Implementation
Nurturing Parenting Programs (Birth to Age 5)	Meets HHS criteria? No	Findings Not measured	For more information Model effectiveness Implementation
Oklahoma’s Community-Based Family Resource and Support (CBFRS) Program Implementation support is not currently available for the model as reviewed.	Meets HHS criteria? Yes	Findings Not measured	For more information Model effectiveness Implementation
Parent-Child Assistance Program (PCAP)	Meets HHS criteria? No	Findings Not measured	For more information Model effectiveness Implementation
ParentChild+^® Core Model	Meets HHS criteria? No	Findings Not measured	For more information Model effectiveness Implementation
Parents as Teachers (PAT)^®	Meets HHS criteria? Yes	Findings Not measured	For more information Model effectiveness Implementation
Philani Outreach Programme	Meets HHS criteria? No	Findings Not measured	For more information Model effectiveness Implementation
Play and Learning Strategies (PALS) Entries in this row combine information across all versions of PALS. Only PALS Infant meets HHS criteria for an evidence-based home visiting model. Some other versions of PALS have at least one manuscript about a high- or moderate-quality impact study, but no version of the model other than PALS Infant meets HHS criteria for an evidence-based home visiting model.	Meets HHS criteria? No	Findings Not measured	For more information Model effectiveness Implementation
Play and Learning Strategies (PALS) Infant	Meets HHS criteria? Yes	Findings Not measured	For more information Model effectiveness Implementation
Pride in Parenting (PIP) Implementation support is not currently available for the model as reviewed.	Meets HHS criteria? No	Findings Not measured	For more information Model effectiveness Implementation
Promoting First Relationships^®—Home Visiting Options Entries in this row combine information across both versions of Promoting First Relationships®—Home Visiting Options. Only the Promoting First Relationships®—Home Visiting Intervention Model meets HHS criteria for an evidence-based home visiting model. For the Promoting First Relationships®—Home Visiting Promotion Model, there are no manuscripts about high- or moderate-quality impact studies.	Meets HHS criteria? No	Findings Not measured	For more information Model effectiveness Implementation
Promoting First Relationships^®—Home Visiting Intervention Model	Meets HHS criteria? Yes	Findings Not measured	For more information Model effectiveness Implementation
Promoting Parental Skills and Enhancing Attachment in Early Childhood (CAPEDP) Trial Implementation support is not currently available for the model as reviewed.	Meets HHS criteria? No	Findings Not measured	For more information Model effectiveness Implementation
Resource Mothers Program Implementation support is not currently available for the model as reviewed.	Meets HHS criteria? No	Findings Not measured	For more information Model effectiveness Implementation
Resources, Education, and Care in the Home (REACH)	Meets HHS criteria? No	Findings Not measured	For more information Model effectiveness Implementation
REST Routine Implementation support is not currently available for the model as reviewed.	Meets HHS criteria? No	Findings Not measured	For more information Model effectiveness Implementation
SafeCare^® Entries in this row combine information across all versions of SafeCare. Only SafeCare Augmented meets HHS criteria for an evidence-based home visiting model. For SafeCare itself, there are no manuscripts about high- or moderate-quality impact studies. Some other versions of SafeCare have at least one such manuscript. Planned Activities Training (a SafeCare module) and Cellular Phone Enhanced Planned Activities Training (a SafeCare module with an add-on) show evidence of effectiveness.	Meets HHS criteria? No	Findings Not measured	For more information Model effectiveness Implementation
SafeCare Augmented	Meets HHS criteria? Yes	Findings Favorable: 1 No effect: 3 Unfavorable or ambiguous: 1	For more information Model effectiveness Implementation Outcome details
Seattle-King County Healthy Homes Project	Meets HHS criteria? No	Findings Not applicable	For more information Model effectiveness Implementation
Triple P - Positive Parenting Program^®—Variants suitable for home visiting No Triple P intervention is exclusively delivered in the home with families with children from birth through age 5. This profile is based on (1) studies of programs that provided Triple P services in the home to families with children from birth through age 5, and (2) developer input on the Triple P interventions suitable for delivery in the home with families with children from birth through age 5.	Meets HHS criteria? No	Findings Not measured	For more information Model effectiveness Implementation
Video-Feedback Intervention to promote Positive Parenting-Sensitive Discipline^® (VIPP-SD)	Meets HHS criteria? No	Findings Not measured	For more information Model effectiveness Implementation