Manuscript Details

Easterbrooks, M. A., Fauth, R. C., Menon, M., Stargel, L. E., & Kotake, C. (n.d.). The Massachusetts Healthy Families Evaluation Phase 2 (MHFE-2): Time 6 summary report. Tufts Interdisciplinary Evaluation Research, Tufts University.

Moderate rating
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1
Study design characteristics contributing to rating
Design Attrition Baseline equivalence Confounding factors? Valid, reliable measures?
Randomized controlled trial High

Established on race/ethnicity and SES; outcomes not feasible to assess at baseline

None

Not assessed in manuscripts reviewed under Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1
Notes from the review of this manuscript

In addition to the findings that received moderate ratings, 17 findings in the Maternal Health and Family Economic Self-Sufficiency domains received low ratings because the outcomes were assessable at baseline but were not included as controls in the statistical models that produced the study estimates.

Child Development and School Readiness
Outcome Measure Timing of Follow-Up Rating Direction of Effect Effect Size (Absolute Value) Stastical Significance Sample Size Sample Description
Child has IEP or 504 plan 8 years Moderate
0.07 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 370 children HFM vs. comparison, Massachusetts Healthy Families Evaluation 2 (MHFE -2), Tier 6 full sample
Child in afterschool program 8 years Moderate
0.32 Statistically significant, p <.05 368 children HFM vs. comparison, Massachusetts Healthy Families Evaluation 2 (MHFE -2), Tier 6 full sample
Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire - externalizing 8 years Moderate
0.01 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 366 children HFM vs. comparison, Massachusetts Healthy Families Evaluation 2 (MHFE -2), Tier 6 full sample
Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire - internalizing 8 years Moderate
0.01 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 360 children HFM vs. comparison, Massachusetts Healthy Families Evaluation 2 (MHFE -2), Tier 6 full sample
Effect rating key
Favorable finding / Statistically significant
Unfavorable finding / Statistically significant
Ambiguous finding / Statistically significant
No effect / Not statistically significant
Child Health
Outcome Measure Timing of Follow-Up Rating Direction of Effect Effect Size (Absolute Value) Stastical Significance Sample Size Sample Description
Asthma (diagnosed past year) 8 years Moderate
0.47 Statistically significant, p <.05 384 children HFM vs. comparison, Massachusetts Healthy Families Evaluation 2 (MHFE -2), Tier 6 full sample
Child had dental visit (past year) 8 years Moderate
0.60 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 379 children HFM vs. comparison, Massachusetts Healthy Families Evaluation 2 (MHFE -2), Tier 6 full sample
Child had well visit (past year) 8 years Moderate
0.00 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 383 children HFM vs. comparison, Massachusetts Healthy Families Evaluation 2 (MHFE -2), Tier 6 full sample
Child visited emergency room (past year) 8 years Moderate
0.11 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 383 children HFM vs. comparison, Massachusetts Healthy Families Evaluation 2 (MHFE -2), Tier 6 full sample
Obesity/overweight (past year) 8 years Moderate
0.08 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 384 children HFM vs. comparison, Massachusetts Healthy Families Evaluation 2 (MHFE -2), Tier 6 full sample
Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory - physical functioning 8 years Moderate
0.20 Statistically significant, p <.05 381 children HFM vs. comparison, Massachusetts Healthy Families Evaluation 2 (MHFE -2), Tier 6 full sample
Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory - school functioning 8 years Moderate
0.01 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 383 children HFM vs. comparison, Massachusetts Healthy Families Evaluation 2 (MHFE -2), Tier 6 full sample
Effect rating key
Favorable finding / Statistically significant
Unfavorable finding / Statistically significant
Ambiguous finding / Statistically significant
No effect / Not statistically significant
Maternal Health
Outcome Measure Timing of Follow-Up Rating Direction of Effect Effect Size (Absolute Value) Stastical Significance Sample Size Sample Description
Parenting Stress Index - difficult child 8 years Moderate
0.24 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 380 mothers HFM vs. comparison, Massachusetts Healthy Families Evaluation 2 (MHFE -2), Tier 6 full sample
Parenting Stress Index - parental child-dysfunctional interaction 8 years Moderate
0.22 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 380 mothers HFM vs. comparison, Massachusetts Healthy Families Evaluation 2 (MHFE -2), Tier 6 full sample
Parenting Stress Index - parental distress 8 years Moderate
0.22 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 379 mothers HFM vs. comparison, Massachusetts Healthy Families Evaluation 2 (MHFE -2), Tier 6 full sample
Effect rating key
Favorable finding / Statistically significant
Unfavorable finding / Statistically significant
Ambiguous finding / Statistically significant
No effect / Not statistically significant
Positive Parenting Practices
Outcome Measure Timing of Follow-Up Rating Direction of Effect Effect Size (Absolute Value) Stastical Significance Sample Size Sample Description
Family Involvement Questionnaire - Home-Based Involvement 8 years Moderate
0.10 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 373 mothers HFM vs. comparison, Massachusetts Healthy Families Evaluation 2 (MHFE -2), Tier 6 full sample
Family Involvement Questionnaire - Home-School Conferencing 8 years Moderate
0.14 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 388 mothers HFM vs. comparison, Massachusetts Healthy Families Evaluation 2 (MHFE -2), Tier 6 full sample
Family Involvement Questionnaire: School-Based Involvement 8 years Moderate
0.00 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 341 mothers HFM vs. comparison, Massachusetts Healthy Families Evaluation 2 (MHFE -2), Tier 6 full sample
Effect rating key
Favorable finding / Statistically significant
Unfavorable finding / Statistically significant
Ambiguous finding / Statistically significant
No effect / Not statistically significant
Reductions In Child Maltreatment
Outcome Measure Timing of Follow-Up Rating Direction of Effect Effect Size (Absolute Value) Stastical Significance Sample Size Sample Description
Permanent custody loss 8 years Moderate
0.17 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 408 mother/child dyads HFM vs. comparison, Massachusetts Healthy Families Evaluation 2 (MHFE -2), Tier 6 full sample
Substantiated child maltreatment reports 8 years Moderate
0.09 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 408 mother/child dyads HFM vs. comparison, Massachusetts Healthy Families Evaluation 2 (MHFE -2), Tier 6 full sample
Effect rating key
Favorable finding / Statistically significant
Unfavorable finding / Statistically significant
Ambiguous finding / Statistically significant
No effect / Not statistically significant

This study included participants with the following characteristics at enrollment:

Race/Ethnicity

The race and ethnicity categories may sum to more than 100 percent if Hispanic ethnicity was reported separately or respondents could select two or more race or ethnicity categories.

Black or African American
23%
Hispanic or Latino
36%
White
35%
Unknown
7%

Maternal Education

Less than a high school diploma
19%
High school diploma or GED
42%
Unknown
39%

Other Characteristics

Enrollment in means-tested programs
18%

This study included participants from the following locations:

  • Massachusetts
Study Participants

The program enrolled participants during pregnancy or as new parents and they were eligible if they were English- or Spanish-speaking females, at least 16 years old, and had not previously received the home visiting program services. Recruitment ended in 2008 and 2009. This study reported follow-up results at 8 years after enrollment, when children were 7.5 years old on average. Maternal age at enrollment was 18.7 years on average. The full study sample was 36 percent Hispanic; 35 percent White, non-Hispanic; and 23 percent Black, non-Hispanic. Of sample members at the time of enrollment, 42 percent had a high school diploma or GED, 25 percent were currently employed, 18 percent had received state cash assistance, and 16 percent had received Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits.

Setting

Massachusetts

Intervention condition
Comparison Conditions

The comparison condition received only referrals and information.

Author Affiliation

The authors are affiliated with Tufts University and the study was conducted by the Children's Trust. The authors are not affiliated with the developer or distributer of Healthy Families America.

Funding Sources

Children's Trust Massachusetts and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Maternal, Infant, and Early Childhood Home Visiting Grant Program (grant no. X10MC29474).