Manuscript Details

Minkovitz, C., Strobino, D., Hughart, N., Scharfstein, D., Guyer, B., & Healthy Steps Evaluation Team (2001). Early effects of the Healthy Steps for Young Children Program. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 155(4), 470–479.

High rating
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1
Author Affiliation

None of the study authors are developers of this model.

Funding Sources

The Commonwealth Fund and local funders.

Study Design
Design Attrition Baseline equivalence Confounding factors Valid, reliable measures?
Randomized controlled trial Low

Not established on race/ethnicity or SES (i.e., maternal education).

None

Not assessed in manuscripts reviewed under Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

In 2020, HomVEE updated this review to move the measures of whether the parent gave the baby cereal or water from the Positive Parenting Practice domain to the Child Health domain because ACF determined that HomVEE should place all child feeding outcomes under the Child Health domain. 

Study presents unadjusted program and comparison group means (columns 5 and 6). Tests of statistical significance apply to adjusted results in column 7 (means difference or odds ratio).

The standard errors in Minkovitz et al. (2001) are adjusted for clustering by site.

Findings that rate moderate or high in this manuscript

Child health
Outcome measure Timing of follow-up Rating Direction of Effect Effect size (absolute value) Stastical significance Sample size Sample description
Continuing to breastfeed 2-4 mo. High
0.08 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 1987 mothers The 6 RCT national evaluation sites
Gave baby water 2-4 mo. High
0.14 Statistically significant,p < 0.05 1987 mothers The 6 RCT national evaluation sites
Gave baby cereal 2-4 mo. High
0.08 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 1987 mothers The 6 RCT national evaluation sites
Effect rating key
Favorable finding / Statistically significant
Unfavorable finding / Statistically significant
Ambiguous finding / Statistically significant
No effect / Not statistically significant
Positive parenting practices
Outcome measure Timing of follow-up Rating Direction of Effect Effect size (absolute value) Stastical significance Sample size Sample description
Used wrong sleep position 2-4 mo. High
0.17 Statistically significant,p < 0.05 1987 mothers The 6 RCT national evaluation sites
Car seat in back seat 2-4 mo. High
0.05 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 1987 mothers The 6 RCT national evaluation sites
Lowered water temperature 2-4 mo. High
0.04 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 1987 mothers The 6 RCT national evaluation sites
Showed picture books daily 2-4 mo. High
0.05 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 1987 mothers The 6 RCT national evaluation sites
Followed at least 2 routines 2-4 mo. High
0.14 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 1987 mothers The 6 RCT national evaluation sites
Played with baby daily 2-4 mo. High
0.01 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 1987 mothers The 6 RCT national evaluation sites
Effect rating key
Favorable finding / Statistically significant
Unfavorable finding / Statistically significant
Ambiguous finding / Statistically significant
No effect / Not statistically significant
Study Participants

The sample included 1,987 mothers with children ages 2 to 4 months at assessment. All women enrolled in Healthy Steps within four weeks of the child’s birth. Study enrollment occurred between September 1996 and November 1998. Most mothers had a high school degree (~85%) and one in four also had a college degree. Most study participants were white (~62%) or African American (~24%). The most common maternal age groups were 20-29 (~51%) and over 30 (~33%). Nearly two-thirds of mothers were married.

Setting

The six sites—Allentown, PA, Amarillo, TX, Florence, SC, Iowa City, IA, Pittsburgh, PA, and San Diego, CA—were randomly assigned as part of the national evaluation. (There were nine other sites that used quasi-experimental comparisons. These comparisons received a low rating, however. See Study Ratings for details.) Sites were group practices, hospital-based clinics, or pediatric practices in health maintenance organizations.

Home Visiting Services

Healthy Steps Specialists provided well-child care, home visits, a child development telephone information line, child development and family health checkups, written materials for parents that emphasize prevention, parent group meetings, and links to community resources. Home visits typically occurred at least once during the first month after birth and a total of six times by the time the children were age 3. Three in four mothers in the intervention group had received a home visit by the two- to four-month follow-up.

Comparison Conditions

Children in the control group received routine pediatric care but had no exposure to the Healthy Steps Specialist or to Healthy Steps materials.

This study included participants with the following characteristics at enrollment:

Race/Ethnicity

The race and ethnicity categories may sum to more than 100 percent if Hispanic ethnicity was reported separately or respondents could select two or more race or ethnicity categories.

Black or African American
25%
Hispanic or Latino
20%
White
62%
Unknown
13%

Maternal Education

Less than a high school diploma
16%
High school diploma or GED
30%
Some college or Associate's degree
31%
Bachelor's degree or higher
23%
Unknown
0%

Other Characteristics

Enrollment in means-tested programs
36%