Manuscript Details

Source

Kitzman, H., Olds, D. L., Henderson, C. R., Hanks, C., Cole, R., Tatelbaum, R., et al. (1997). Effect of prenatal and infancy home visitation by nurses on pregnancy outcomes, childhood injuries, and repeated childbearing. A randomized controlled trial. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association, 278(8), 644–652.

High rating
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Note: Navigate to model page for more information about the home visiting model. See the study manuscript for more information about how the model was implemented in this study.

Author Affiliation

David L. Olds, a study author, is a developer of this model.

Funding Sources

Five federal agencies: the National Institute of Nursing Research (grant NR01-01691-05); the Bureau of Maternal and Child Health (grant MCJ 360579); the Administration for Children and Families (grant 90PJ0003); the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation; and the National Center for Child Abuse and Neglect, through a transfer of funds to the National Institute of Nursing Research. Four private foundations: the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, Princeton, NJ (grants 017934 and 11084); the Carnegie Corporation of New York, New York, NY (grant 5492); the Pew Charitable Trusts, Philadelphia, Pa (grants 88-0211-000 and 93-02363-000); and the William T. Grant Foundation, New York, NY (grants 88-1246-88 and 91-1246-88), including a William T. Grant Faculty Scholars Award 86108086) and a Senior Research Scientist Award (1-K05-MH01382-01) to Dr. Olds.

Study Design

Design Attrition Baseline equivalence Confounding factors Valid, reliable measures?
Randomized controlled trial Low

Difference in SES, but controlled in analysis.

None

Not assessed in manuscripts reviewed under Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1
Notes

In 2020, HomVEE updated this review to move the NCAST Child Responsiveness (total score) from the Child Development and School Readiness domain to the Positive Parenting Practices domain because ACF determined that outcomes assessed with the NCAST, including the NCAST total score, most appropriately belong in the Positive Parenting Practices domain.

Study Participants

The sample included pregnant, first-time mothers who were less than 29 weeks pregnant. Women were recruited through an obstetrical clinic if they had no previous live births, no chronic illnesses linked to fetal growth retardation or preterm delivery, and at least two of the following sociodemographic characteristics: unmarried, less than 12 years of education, and unemployed. From June 1990 through August 1991, 1,290 women were invited to participate and 1,139 consented and were randomly assigned. At enrollment, 92 percent of the women enrolled were African American, 98 percent were unmarried, and 64 percent were age 18 or younger. This study measured the sample up through the child’s 24th month. At the 24-month follow-up, the sample included 675 women, 208 in the program group and 467 in the comparison group.

Setting

Memphis, Tennessee

Home Visiting Services

The study included two treatment groups. The first treatment group received home visits from a nurse during pregnancy and two postpartum visits (one in the hospital prior to discharge and one in the home). The treatment group also received the screening and transportation services described below for the comparison groups. The second treatment group received the same services as the first treatment group, but the home visiting continued until the child was 2 years old. On average, the nurses completed 7 home visits during pregnancy and 26 home visits postpartum. Nurses used a detailed protocol for each visit, which focused on health-related behaviors, parenting, education, and employment. The two treatment groups were combined for the prenatal analysis. Only the second treatment group was followed for postnatal outcomes.

Note: Navigate to model page for more information about the home visiting model. See the study manuscript for more information about how the model was implemented in this study.

Comparison Conditions

The study included two comparison groups. The first comparison group received taxicab transportation for prenatal care appointments. The second comparison group received the transportation plus developmental screening and referral to services when the children were 6, 12, and 24 months old. The two comparison groups were combined for the prenatal analysis. Only the second group was followed for postnatal outcomes.

Findings that rate moderate or high in this manuscript

Maternal health
Outcome measure Timing of follow-up Rating Direction of Effect Effect size (absolute value) Stastical significance Sample size Sample description

Gestational weight gain

36th week of pregnancy

High

Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05

916 mothers

Full (Memphis)

Systolic blood pressure

36th week of pregnancy

High

Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05

916 mothers

Full (Memphis)

Diastolic blood pressure

36th week of pregnancy

High

Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05

916 mothers

Full (Memphis)

Standard prenatal care visits (total)

36th week of pregnancy

High

Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05

916 mothers

Full (Memphis)

Obstetrical evaluation visits (total)

36th week of pregnancy

High

Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05

916 mothers

Full (Memphis)

Number of hospitalizations during pregnancy

36th week of pregnancy

High

Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05

916 mothers

Full (Memphis)

Number of Gardnerella infections

36th week of pregnancy

High

Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05

916 mothers

Full (Memphis)

Number of yeast infections

36th week of pregnancy

High

Statistically significant,
p ≤ 0.05

916 mothers

Full (Memphis)

Number of sexually transmitted diseases

36th week of pregnancy

High

Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05

916 mothers

Full (Memphis)

Pregnancy-induced hypertension (percentage)

36th week of pregnancy

High
0.31

Statistically significant,
p ≤ 0.01

916 mothers

Full (Memphis)

Subsequent pregnancy, 0-24 months postpartum (percentage)

2 years postpartum

High
0.28

Statistically significant,
p < 0.01

671 mothers

Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and developmental screening comparison (Memphis)

Spontaneous abortion, 0–24 months postpartum (percentage)

2 years postpartum

High
0.32

Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05

671 mothers

Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and developmental screening comparison (Memphis)

Therapeutic abortion, 0–24 months postpartum (percentage)

2 years postpartum

High
0.43

Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05

671 mothers

Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and developmental screening comparison (Memphis)

Subsequent live birth, 0–24 months postpartum (percentage)

2 years postpartum

High
0.28

Statistically significant,
p < 0.01

671 mothers

Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and developmental screening comparison (Memphis)

Anxiety (MHI), 24 months postpartum, standardized

2 years postpartum

High

Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05

671 mothers

Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and developmental screening comparison (Memphis)

Depression (MHI), 24 months postpartum, standardized

2 years postpartum

High

Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05

671 mothers

Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and developmental screening comparison (Memphis)

Pearlin Mastery, 24 months postpartum, standardized

2 years postpartum

High

Statistically significant,
p < 0.01

671 mothers

Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and developmental screening comparison (Memphis)

Effect rating key
Favorable finding / Statistically significant
Unfavorable finding / Statistically significant
Ambiguous finding / Statistically significant
No effect / Not statistically significant
Child health
Outcome measure Timing of follow-up Rating Direction of Effect Effect size (absolute value) Stastical significance Sample size Sample description

Birth weight, grams

Birth

High

Not statistically significant,
p > 0.05

1082 children

Full (Memphis)

Gestational age, weeks

Birth

High

Not statistically significant,
p > 0.05

1082 children

Full, (Memphis)

5-minute Apgar

Birth

High

Not statistically significant,
p > 0.05

1082 children

Full, (Memphis)

Low birth weight (percentage < 2500 g)

Birth

High
0.05

Not statistically significant,
p > 0.05

1082 children

Full, (Memphis)

Intrauterine growth restriction (percentage)

Birth

High
0.00

Not statistically significant,
p > 0.05

1082 children

Full, (Memphis)

Preterm (less than 37 weeks, percentage)

Birth

High
0.12

Not statistically significant,
p > 0.05

1082 children

Full, (Memphis)

Indicated preterm delivery (percentage)

Birth

High
0.00

Not statistically significant,
p > 0.05

1082 children

Full, (Memphis)

Spontaneous preterm delivery, percentage

Birth

High
0.08

Not statistically significant,
p > 0.05

1082 children

Full, (Memphis)

Breastfeeding attempted, percentage

2 years postnatal

High
0.37

Statistically significant,
p < 0.01

671 children

Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and developmental screening comparison (Memphis)

Immunizations up to date, percentage

2 years postnatal

High
0.06

Not statistically significant,
p > 0.05

671 children

Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and developmental screening comparison (Memphis)

Number of well-child visits

2 years postnatal

High

Not statistically significant,
p > 0.05

671 children

Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and developmental screening comparison (Memphis)

Effect rating key
Favorable finding / Statistically significant
Unfavorable finding / Statistically significant
Ambiguous finding / Statistically significant
No effect / Not statistically significant
Positive parenting practices
Outcome measure Timing of follow-up Rating Direction of Effect Effect size (absolute value) Stastical significance Sample size Sample description

NCAST Child Responsiveness (total score)

2 years postnatal

High

Not statistically significant,
p > 0.05

1082 children

Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and developmental screening comparison (Memphis)

Beliefs associated with child abuse (AAPI total score)

2 years postpartum

High

Statistically significant,
p < 0.01

672 mothers

Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and developmental screening comparison (Memphis)

HOME (emotional/ cognitive stimulation)

2 years postpartum

High

Statistically significant,
p < 0.01

675 mothers

Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and developmental screening comparison (Memphis)

NCAST Maternal Teaching (total score)

2 years postpartum

High

Not statistically significant,
p > 0.05

675 mothers

Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and developmental screening comparison (Memphis)

Effect rating key
Favorable finding / Statistically significant
Unfavorable finding / Statistically significant
Ambiguous finding / Statistically significant
No effect / Not statistically significant
Child development and school readiness
Outcome measure Timing of follow-up Rating Direction of Effect Effect size (absolute value) Stastical significance Sample size Sample description

BSID (total score)

2 years postnatal

High

Not statistically significant,
p > 0.05

1082 children

Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and developmental screening comparison (Memphis)

CBCL (total score)

2 years postnatal

High

Not statistically significant,
p > 0.05

1082 children

Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and developmental screening comparison (Memphis)

Effect rating key
Favorable finding / Statistically significant
Unfavorable finding / Statistically significant
Ambiguous finding / Statistically significant
No effect / Not statistically significant
Reductions in child maltreatment
Outcome measure Timing of follow-up Rating Direction of Effect Effect size (absolute value) Stastical significance Sample size Sample description

Total number of health care encounters–injuries/ingestions

2 years postnatal

High

Statistically significant,
p ≤ 0.05

671 children

Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and developmental screening comparison (Memphis)

Number of outpatient visits–injuries/ingestions

2 years postnatal

High

Statistically significant,
p ≤ 0.05

671 children

Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and developmental screening comparison (Memphis)

Number of emergency department visits–injuries/ingestions

2 years postnatal

High

Not statistically significant,
p > 0.05

671 children

Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and developmental screening comparison (Memphis)

Number of hospitalizations–injuries/ingestions

2 years postnatal

High

Not statistically significant,
p > 0.05

671 children

Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and developmental screening comparison (Memphis)

Number of days hospitalized–injuries/ingestions

2 years postnatal

High

Statistically significant,
p < 0.01

671 children

Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and developmental screening comparison (Memphis)

Effect rating key
Favorable finding / Statistically significant
Unfavorable finding / Statistically significant
Ambiguous finding / Statistically significant
No effect / Not statistically significant
Family economic self-sufficiency
Outcome measure Timing of follow-up Rating Direction of Effect Effect size (absolute value) Stastical significance Sample size Sample description

Used other community services

36th week of pregnancy

High
0.30

Statistically significant,
p ≤ 0.01

916 mothers

Full (Memphis)

In school during pregnancy

36th week of pregnancy

High
0.07

Not statistically significant,
p > 0.05

916 mothers

Full (Memphis)

Employed during pregnancy

36th week of pregnancy

High
0.44

Not statistically significant,
p > 0.05

916 mothers

Full (Memphis)

Months worked, 0–12 months postpartum

2 years postpartum

High

Not statistically significant,
p > 0.05

681 mothers

Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and developmental screening comparison (Memphis)

Months worked, 13–24 months postpartum

2 years postpartum

High

Not statistically significant,
p > 0.05

671 mothers

Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and developmental screening comparison (Memphis)

Months on AFDC , 0–12 months postpartum

2 years postpartum

High

Not statistically significant,
p > 0.05

681 mothers

Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and developmental screening comparison (Memphis)

Months on AFDC , 13–24 months postpartum

2 years postpartum

High

Not statistically significant,
p > 0.05

671 mothers

Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and developmental screening comparison (Memphis)

Effect rating key
Favorable finding / Statistically significant
Unfavorable finding / Statistically significant
Ambiguous finding / Statistically significant
No effect / Not statistically significant