Manuscript Details

Source

Peer reviewed?
Yes

Chapman, D. J., Damio, G., Young, S., & Perez-Escamilla, R. (2004). Effectiveness of breastfeeding peer counseling in a low-income, predominantly Latina population: A randomized controlled trial. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 158(9), 897-902. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpedi.158.9.897

Rating
High
Author Affiliation

The authors are affiliated with the University of Connecticut, the Hispanic Health Council, and Hartford Hospital. One of the authors is affiliated with the Hispanic Health Council, which sponsors the Breastfeeding: Heritage and Pride™ home visiting model.

Funding Sources

This research was supported by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention through a subcontract with the Association of Teachers of Preventative Medicine; Connecticut Family Nutrition Program for Infants, Toddlers, and Children; and the Hartford Hospital Research Foundation.

Study Design

Design Attrition Baseline equivalence Confounding factors Valid, reliable measures?
Randomized controlled trial Low

Not assessed for randomized controlled trials with low attrition

No

Yes

Notes
Study Participants

Pregnant women were recruited at prenatal clinics. To be eligible, the mother had to be age 18 or older, up to 26 weeks pregnant, and have low income (that is, participating in the Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children or in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, or with a household income below 180 percent of the federal poverty level). At the time of birth, mother-child dyads were screened a final time and eligible for the study if the newborn was born healthy at full term, had no congenital anomalies and no maternal history of human immunodeficiency virus, and was not admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit. Among eligible mothers, 90 were randomly assigned to the Breastfeeding: Heritage and Pride™ (BHP) home visiting group and 75 to the comparison group. Outcomes were measured at birth and at one month, three months, and six months postpartum. Eighty percent of mothers were Hispanic, nine percent were African American, four percent were White, and eight percent reported they were another race.

Setting

The study took place in Hartford, Connecticut.

Home Visiting Services

The Breastfeeding: Heritage and Pride™ (BHP) intervention consisted of at least one prenatal home visit, daily in-hospital visits during postpartum hospitalization, and three postpartum home visits. These visits were conducted by peer counselors, one of whom was assigned to each mother-child dyad. During the prenatal home visit, the peer counselor provided education on a range of topics including the benefits of breastfeeding, common breastfeeding myths, behaviors that impede early initiation and successful breastfeeding, infant feeding cues, and proper latch-on technique or positioning. During the postpartum period, mothers received the first home visit within 24 hours of discharge from the hospital. The peer counselor provided one-on-one breastfeeding support and counseling based on the mother’s needs. Free mini-electric breast pumps were provided to mothers who needed one.

Comparison Conditions

Mothers assigned to the comparison group received routine breastfeeding education. This included written materials on breastfeeding and individualized breastfeeding information in response to questions at prenatal visits. During postpartum hospitalization, mothers received one-on-one assistance and education from staff nurses, and had access to a certified lactation consultant for serious breastfeeding problems. During the postpartum period, mothers could also call the hospital to speak with a registered nurse who could answer questions about breastfeeding.

Were any subgroups examined?
No
Subgroups examined

There were no subgroups reported in this manuscript.

Findings that rate moderate or high in this manuscript

Child health
Outcome measure Timing of follow-up Rating Effect size Stastical significance Sample size Sample description

No initiation or cessation of breastfeeding

birth

High 0.39

Statistically significant, p <0.05

165 mother/child dyads

BHP and conventional breastfeeding support vs. conventional breastfeeding support RCT, Connecticut, 2000-2003, full sample

No initiation or cessation of breastfeeding

1 month old

High 0.72

Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05

157 mother/child dyads

BHP and conventional breastfeeding support vs. conventional breastfeeding support RCT, Connecticut, 2000-2003, full sample

No initiation or cessation of breastfeeding

3 months old

High 0.78

Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05

153 mother/child dyads

BHP and conventional breastfeeding support vs. conventional breastfeeding support RCT, Connecticut, 2000-2003, full sample

No initiation or cessation of breastfeeding

6 months old

High 0.94

Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05

144 mother/child dyads

BHP and conventional breastfeeding support vs. conventional breastfeeding support RCT, Connecticut, 2000-2003, full sample

Exclusive breastfeeding

1 month old

High 1.07

Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05

157 mother/child dyads

BHP and conventional breastfeeding support vs. conventional breastfeeding support RCT, Connecticut, 2000-2003, full sample

Effect rating key
Favorable finding / Statistically significant
UnFavorable finding / Statistically significant
Ambiguous finding / Statistically significant
No effect / Not statistically significant

This study included participants with the following characteristics at enrollment:

Race/Ethnicity

The race and ethnicity categories may sum to more than 100 percent if Hispanic ethnicity was reported separately or respondents could select two or more race or ethnicity categories.

Black or African American
9.00%
Hispanic or Latino
80.00%
White
4.00%
Some other race
8.00%

Maternal Education

Data not available

Other Characteristics

Enrollment in means-tested programs
72.10%