Manuscript Details

Source

Love, J., Kisker, E., Ross, C. M., Schochet, P. Z., Brooks-Gunn, J., Paulsell, D., et al. (2002). Making a difference in the lives of infants and toddlers and their families: The impacts of Early Head Start. Volumes I-III: Final technical report [and] appendixes [and] local contributions to understanding the programs and their impacts. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Head Start Bureau.

Rating
High
Author Affiliation

None of the study authors are developers of this model.

Funding Sources

Administration for Children and Families (ACF), the Child Outcomes Research and Evaluation team (CORE)within ACF’s Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation (OPRE), and the Head Start Bureau in the Administration on Children, Youth and Families (ACYF)

Study Design

Design Attrition Baseline equivalence Confounding factors Valid, reliable measures?
Randomized controlled trial Low Established on race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status; Established on many relevant outcomes None
Notes

In 2020, HomVEE updated this review to remove mother's partnership status/family structure findings from the Family Economic Self-Sufficiency domain because ACF determined that mother's partnership status is ineligible for review by HomVEE.

The study expressed some effect sizes as a percentage of the standard deviation. To be consistent with other studies, HomVEE divided the study-reported effect size by 100 and rounded to two decimal places.
This study received a mixed rating. Outcomes from the Parent Services Interview have low attrition and typically receive a high rating (though some outcomes that were assessable at baseline and not controlled receive a moderate rating). Outcomes from the Child Assessment (Bayley) and Parent/Child Interactions have high attrition, but baseline equivalence is established and those outcomes receive a moderate rating. Outcomes from the 36-month parent interview have high attrition, but baseline equivalence was established so they generally rate moderate, although outcomes on maternal health and male/father presence were assessable and not controlled, and therefore rate low.
Study Participants

This study relies on data from a randomized controlled trial of 17 Early Head Start (EHS) programs that began in 1995. Seven of the programs served clients through a home-based option (though other clients in other EHS options also received home visits) and are the focus of this report (EHS-HBO). The study randomly assigned 1,385 families, who applied to those 7 programs, either to receive home-based EHS or a comparison condition. This study included outcomes reported for the 3-year-old follow-up (other years of follow-up are reported in separate studies). For this follow-up, 950 parents (502 in EHS-HBO and 448 in the comparison group) provided data for parent interviews. Among parent interview participants, 46 percent were white, 25 percent were black, and 26 percent were Hispanic. One in four parents had more than a high school education, and one in 10 were in families living above the poverty line; one-third to one-half of families were receiving welfare (AFDC) or Food Stamps.

Setting

The study was conducted in 17 EHS programs throughout the United States, including 7 programs with home-based options, which are the focus of this report. Four programs were located in urban areas and three programs were located in rural areas. The seven programs represented a mix of implementation timing; one early implementer had all EHS-HBO elements in place by 1997, and three later implementers had all elements in place by 1999; three programs did not have all elements in place by 1999. The early-implementing program had fully implemented both child and family development services early and continued to have those services in place in 1999.

Home Visiting Services

EHS-HBO services are intended to be delivered to study families via weekly home visits. Seventy percent of families in these programs received weekly visits during at least one of the first two follow-up periods, and 26 percent received such services throughout both periods. Over the first two years, families in the home-based option received an average of 71 visits. Typical home visits are at least one hour long. Topics for home visits included child growth and development, child play activities, housing issues, and parent-child communication.

Comparison Conditions

Control group families could not receive EHS-HBO services, but could receive other services available in their community.

Findings that rate moderate or high in this manuscript

Maternal health
Outcome measure Timing of follow-up Rating Effect size Stastical significance Sample size Sample description
PSI Parental distress 36 months postpartum Moderate -0.14 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 950 mothers EHS-HBO impact sample
PSI Parent-Child dysfunctional interaction 36 months postpartum Moderate -0.10 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 950 mothers EHS-HBO impact sample
FES: Family conflict 36 months postpartum Moderate -0.01 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 950 mothers EHS-HBO impact sample
Subsequent birth by 24 months after random assignment 28 months after assignment High -0.07 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 941 mothers EHS-HBO impact sample
Effect rating key
Favorable finding / Statistically significant
UnFavorable finding / Statistically significant
Ambiguous finding / Statistically significant
No effect / Not statistically significant
Child health
Outcome measure Timing of follow-up Rating Effect size Stastical significance Sample size Sample description
Child’s health status Age 3 Moderate -0.04 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 950 children EHS-HBO impact sample
Percentage of children in fair or poor health Age 3 Moderate 0.01 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 950 children EHS-HBO impact sample
Effect rating key
Favorable finding / Statistically significant
UnFavorable finding / Statistically significant
Ambiguous finding / Statistically significant
No effect / Not statistically significant
Positive parenting practices
Outcome measure Timing of follow-up Rating Effect size Stastical significance Sample size Sample description
HOME total score Age 3 Moderate 0.04 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 950 children EHS-HBO impact study
HOME internal physical environment Age 3 Moderate -0.02 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 950 children EHS-HBO impact study
HOME warmth Age 3 Moderate -0.01 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 950 children EHS-HBO impact study
Supportiveness during parent-child semistructured play Age 3 Moderate 0.16 Statistically significant,
p < 0.05
744 children EHS-HBO impact study
Supportive presence during parent-child puzzle challenge task Age 3 Moderate 0.07 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 744 children EHS-HBO impact study
Percentage of children with a regular bedtime Age 3 Moderate 0.07 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 950 children EHS-HBO impact study
Percentage of children that follow a bedtime routine Age 3 Moderate 0.02 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 950 children EHS-HBO impact study
HOME: support of language and learning Age 3 Moderate 0.07 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 950 children EHS-HBO impact study
Parent-child play Age 3 Moderate -0.06 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 744 children EHS-HBO impact study
Quality of assistance during parent-child puzzle challenge task Age 3 Moderate 0.03 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 744 children EHS-HBO impact study
Percentage of parents that read to child daily Age 3 Moderate -0.02 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 950 children EHS-HBO impact study
Percentage of parents that read to child at bedtime Age 3 Moderate 0.08 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 950 children EHS-HBO impact study
Detachment during parent-child semi-structured play Age 3 Moderate -0.09 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 744 children EHS-HBO impact study
Intrusiveness during parent-child semistructured play Age 3 Moderate -0.06 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 744 children EHS-HBO impact study
Detachment during parent-child puzzle challenge tasks Age 3 Moderate -0.04 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 744 children EHS-HBO impact study
Intrusiveness during parent-child puzzle challenge task Age 3 Moderate -0.09 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 744 children EHS-HBO impact study
Negative regard during parent-child semistructured play Age 3 Moderate -0.10 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 744 children EHS-HBO impact study
HOME harshness Age 3 Moderate 0.06 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 950 children EHS-HBO impact study
Percentage of parents that spanked child in the past week Age 3 Moderate -0.11 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 950 children EHS-HBO impact study
Percentage of parents that usually use a car seat correctly Age 3 Moderate 0.02 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 950 children EHS-HBO impact study
Percentage of parents suggesting physical punishment as a discipline strategy Age 3 Moderate 0.01 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 950 children EHS-HBO impact study
Percentage of parents that would use mild discipline only Age 3 Moderate 0.00 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 950 children EHS-HBO impact study
Index of severity of discipline strategies Age 3 Moderate -0.02 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 950 children EHS-HBO impact study
Effect rating key
Favorable finding / Statistically significant
UnFavorable finding / Statistically significant
Ambiguous finding / Statistically significant
No effect / Not statistically significant
Family economic self-sufficiency
Outcome measure Timing of follow-up Rating Effect size Stastical significance Sample size Sample description
Ever in education or training 28 months after assignment High -0.15 Statistically significant,
p < 0.05
941 mothers EHS-HBO impact study
Ever in high school 28 months after assignment Moderate -0.20 Statistically significant,
p < 0.01
941 mothers EHS-HBO impact study
Ever in ESL class 28 months after assignment Moderate -0.07 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 941 mothers EHS-HBO impact study
Ever in vocational program 28 months after assignment Moderate -0.07 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 941 mothers EHS-HBO impact study
Average hours per week in education or training 28 months after assignment High -0.24 Statistically significant,
p < 0.01
941 mothers EHS-HBO impact study
In education or training: 1st quarter 28 months after assignment High 0.01 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 941 mothers EHS-HBO impact study
In education or training: 2nd quarter 28 months after assignment High -0.05 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 941 mothers EHS-HBO impact study
In education or training: 3rd quarter 28 months after assignment High -0.04 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 941 mothers EHS-HBO impact study
In education or training: 4th quarter 28 months after assignment High -0.11 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 941 mothers EHS-HBO impact study
In education or training: 5th quarter 28 months after assignment High -0.13 Statistically significant,
p < 0.05
941 mothers EHS-HBO impact study
In education or training: 6th quarter 28 months after assignment High -0.18 Statistically significant,
p < 0.01
941 mothers EHS-HBO impact study
In education or training: 7th quarter 28 months after assignment High -0.14 Statistically significant,
p < 0.05
941 mothers EHS-HBO impact study
In education or training: 8th quarter 28 months after assignment High -0.22 Statistically significant,
p < 0.01
941 mothers EHS-HBO impact study
Have high school diploma 28 months after assignment High -0.07 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 941 mothers EHS-HBO impact study
Have GED 28 months after assignment High 0.09 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 941 mothers EHS-HBO impact study
Ever employed 28 months after assignment High -0.04 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 941 mothers EHS-HBO impact study
Average hours per week employed 28 months after assignment High 0.02 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 941 mothers EHS-HBO impact study
Employed: 1st quarter 28 months after assignment High 0.05 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 941 mothers EHS-HBO impact study
Employed: 2nd quarter 28 months after assignment High 0.10 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 941 mothers EHS-HBO impact study
Employed: 3rd quarter 28 months after assignment High 0.07 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 941 mothers EHS-HBO impact study
Employed: 4th quarter 28 months after assignment High 0.00 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 941 mothers EHS-HBO impact study
Effect rating key
Favorable finding / Statistically significant
UnFavorable finding / Statistically significant
Ambiguous finding / Statistically significant
No effect / Not statistically significant

This study included participants with the following characteristics at enrollment:

Race/Ethnicity

The race and ethnicity categories may sum to more than 100 percent if Hispanic ethnicity was reported separately or respondents could select two or more race or ethnicity categories.

Black or African American
25.00%
Hispanic or Latino
26.00%
White
46.00%
Unknown
3.00%

Maternal Education

Less than a high school diploma
75.00%
Unknown
25.00%

Other Characteristics

Enrollment in means-tested programs
35.00%