Manuscript Details

Izzo, C., Eckenrode, J., Smith, E., Henderson, C., Cole, R., Kitzman, H., & Olds, D. L. (2005). Reducing the impact of uncontrollable stressful life events through a program of nurse home visitation for new parents. Prevention Science, 6(4), 269–274.

High rating
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1
Study design characteristics contributing to rating
Design Attrition Baseline equivalence Confounding factors? Valid, reliable measures?
Randomized controlled trial Low

Established on race/ethnicity and SES; outcomes not feasible to assess at baseline

None

Not assessed in manuscripts reviewed under Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1
Notes from the review of this manuscript

In addition to the outcomes that received a high rating, substance use outcomes in the maternal health domain received a moderate rating because equivalence was not established on baseline measures of the outcomes.

Maternal Health
Outcome Measure Timing of Follow-Up Rating Direction of Effect Effect Size (Absolute Value) Stastical Significance Sample Size Sample Description
Alcohol impairment score 15 years Moderate
0.02 Not statistically significant, p = 0.87 300 mothers Nurse-visited group 4 vs. comparison groups 1 and 2, Elmira sample
Mental health - Anxiety: Mental Health Inventory (MHI) 15 years High
0.00 Not statistically significant, p = 1.00 300 mothers Nurse-visited group 4 vs. comparison groups 1 and 2, Elmira sample
Mental health - Depression: Mental Health Inventory (MHI) 15 years High
0.01 Not statistically significant, p = 0.95 300 mothers Nurse-visited group 4 vs. comparison groups 1 and 2, Elmira sample
Mental health - Emotional stability: Mental Health Inventory (MHI) 15 years High
0.02 Not statistically significant, p = 0.90 300 mothers Nurse-visited group 4 vs. comparison groups 1 and 2, Elmira sample
Mental health - Positive well-being: Mental Health Inventory (MHI) 15 years High
0.02 Not statistically significant, p = 0.90 300 mothers Nurse-visited group 4 vs. comparison groups 1 and 2, Elmira sample
Substance use - # cigarettes smoked per day 15 years Moderate
0.21 Not statistically significant, p = 0.11 300 mothers Nurse-visited group 4 vs. comparison groups 1 and 2, Elmira sample
Substance use - binge drinking: # days had 5+ drinks in the past year 15 years Moderate
0.06 Not statistically significant, p = 0.65 300 mothers Nurse-visited group 4 vs. comparison groups 1 and 2, Elmira sample
Effect rating key
Favorable finding / Statistically significant
Unfavorable finding / Statistically significant
Ambiguous finding / Statistically significant
No effect / Not statistically significant
Positive Parenting Practices
Outcome Measure Timing of Follow-Up Rating Direction of Effect Effect Size (Absolute Value) Stastical Significance Sample Size Sample Description
Parenting practices - Hostility: Child Report of Parental Behavior Inventory (CRPBI) 15 years High
1.22 Statistically significant, p = 0.00 300 children Nurse-visited group 4 vs. comparison groups 1 and 2, Elmira sample
Parenting practices - Inconsistent discipline: Child Report of Parental Behavior Inventory (CRPBI) 15 years High
0.16 Not statistically significant, p = 0.23 300 children Nurse-visited group 4 vs. comparison groups 1 and 2, Elmira sample
Parenting practices - Parent involvement: Child Report of Parental Behavior Inventory (CRPBI) 15 years High
0.02 Not statistically significant, p = 0.89 300 children Nurse-visited group 4 vs. comparison groups 1 and 2, Elmira sample
Parenting practices - Supervision: Parenting Style Index measure by Steinberg et al. (1993) 15 years High
0.26 Not statistically significant, p = 0.05 300 children Nurse-visited group 4 vs. comparison groups 1 and 2, Elmira sample
Parenting practices - Warmth: Child Report of Parental Behavior Inventory (CRPBI) 15 years High
0.04 Not statistically significant, p = 0.76 300 children Nurse-visited group 4 vs. comparison groups 1 and 2, Elmira sample
Effect rating key
Favorable finding / Statistically significant
Unfavorable finding / Statistically significant
Ambiguous finding / Statistically significant
No effect / Not statistically significant

This study included participants with the following characteristics at enrollment:

Race/Ethnicity

The race and ethnicity categories may sum to more than 100 percent if Hispanic ethnicity was reported separately or respondents could select two or more race or ethnicity categories.

White
88%
Unknown
12%

Maternal Education

Data not available

Other Characteristics

Data not available

This study included participants from the following locations:

  • New York
Study Participants

Participants were 324 mothers and 315 of their first-born children. The mothers and children all participated in an RCT examining the Nurse-Family Partnership model in Elmira, NY in 1978. At the time of recruitment, participants were pregnant, first-time mothers who were less than 25 weeks pregnant. All participants were all either under the age of 19; unmarried; or had low socioeconomic status, as indicated by their Medicaid eligibility.

Setting

Elmira, NY, USA

Intervention condition
Comparison Conditions

Mothers in the comparison group received developmental and sensory screening for their children, clinical referrals, and transportation to prenatal and postnatal care.

Author Affiliation

David L. Olds, one of the study authors, is also the model developer.

Funding Sources

This study was supported with grants from the Prevention Research Branch of the National Institutes of Mental Health (R01-MH49381); the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (96ASPE278A); the Children's Bureau, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (90-CA-1631). The research was also supported by an NIH Senior Research Scientist Award.