Manuscript Details

Source

Minkovitz, C. S., Strobino, D., Mistry, K. B., Scharfstein, D. O., Grason, H., Hou, W., Guyer, B. (2007). Healthy Steps for Young Children: Sustained results at 5.5 years. Pediatrics, 120(3), 658–668.
Moderate rating
Author Affiliation
None of the study authors are developers of this model.
Funding Sources
The Commonwealth Fund (grant 20010683) and the Agency for Healthcare Quality and Research (grant R01HS13086).

Study Design

Design Attrition Baseline equivalence Confounding factors Valid, reliable measures?
Randomized controlled trial High Established on race/ethnicity and SES (i.e., family income). Equivalence on baseline measures is not feasible. None
Notes
Study presents unadjusted program and comparison group means (columns 5 and 6). Tests of statistical significance apply to adjusted results in column 7 (means difference or odds ratio).
Study Participants
The sample included 1,308 mothers with children about 5.5 years old at assessment. All women enrolled in Healthy Steps within four weeks of the child’s birth. Study enrollment occurred between September 1996 and November 1998. Just over one in three parents had a college degree, and 40% had incomes above $50,000 at baseline. Most study participants were white (65%) or African American (21%). The most common maternal age groups were 20-29 (48%) and over 30 (42%).
Setting
The six sites—Allentown, PA, Amarillo, TX, Florence, SC, Iowa City, IA, Pittsburgh, PA, and San Diego, CA—were randomly assigned as part of the national evaluation. (There were nine other sites that used quasi-experimental comparisons. These comparisons received a low rating, however. See Study Ratings for details.) Sites were group practices, hospital-based clinics, or pediatric practices in health maintenance organizations.
Home Visiting Services
Healthy Steps Specialists provided well-child care, up to six home visits in the first three years, a child development telephone information line, child development and family health checkups, written materials for parents that emphasize prevention, parent group meetings, and links to community resources. Families actually received fewer than two visits, on average, during the child’s first 2.5 years.
Comparison Conditions
Children in the control group received routine pediatric care but had no exposure to the Healthy Steps Specialist or to Healthy Steps materials.

Findings that rate moderate or high in this manuscript

Child health
Outcome measure Timing of follow-up Rating Direction of Effect Effect size (absolute value) Stastical significance Sample size Sample description
Child hospitalized in past year 5.5 years Moderate
0.02 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 1308 children The 6 RCT national evaluation sites
Effect rating key
Favorable finding / Statistically significant
UnFavorable finding / Statistically significant
Ambiguous finding / Statistically significant
No effect / Not statistically significant
Child development and school readiness
Outcome measure Timing of follow-up Rating Direction of Effect Effect size (absolute value) Stastical significance Sample size Sample description
Clinical or borderline concern about child behavior 5.5 years Moderate
0.14 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 1308 children The 6 RCT national evaluation sites
Effect rating key
Favorable finding / Statistically significant
UnFavorable finding / Statistically significant
Ambiguous finding / Statistically significant
No effect / Not statistically significant
Reductions in child maltreatment
Outcome measure Timing of follow-up Rating Direction of Effect Effect size (absolute value) Stastical significance Sample size Sample description
Used emergency department in past year for injury 5.5 years Moderate
0.02 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 1308 children The 6 RCT national evaluation sites
Effect rating key
Favorable finding / Statistically significant
UnFavorable finding / Statistically significant
Ambiguous finding / Statistically significant
No effect / Not statistically significant
Positive parenting practices
Outcome measure Timing of follow-up Rating Direction of Effect Effect size (absolute value) Stastical significance Sample size Sample description
Ever slap in face/spank with object 5.5 yrs Moderate
0.10 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 1308 mothers The 6 RCT national evaluation sites
Use harsh discipline 5.5 yrs Moderate
0.15 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 1308 mothers The 6 RCT national evaluation sites
Often/almost always negotiate 5.5 yrs Moderate
0.14 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 1308 mothers The 6 RCT national evaluation sites
Often/almost always ignore misbehavior 5.5 yrs Moderate
0.04 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 1308 mothers The 6 RCT national evaluation sites
Routine/regular bedtime 5.5 yrs Moderate
0.17 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 1308 mothers The 6 RCT national evaluation sites
Looked at/read books in past week 5.5 yrs Moderate
0.04 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 1308 mothers The 6 RCT national evaluation sites
Effect rating key
Favorable finding / Statistically significant
UnFavorable finding / Statistically significant
Ambiguous finding / Statistically significant
No effect / Not statistically significant

This study included participants with the following characteristics at enrollment:

Race/Ethnicity

The race and ethnicity categories may sum to more than 100 percent if Hispanic ethnicity was reported separately or respondents could select two or more race or ethnicity categories.

Black or African American
21%
Hispanic or Latino
16%
White
65%
Unknown
14%

Maternal Education

Less than a high school diploma
12%
High school diploma or GED
27%
Some college or Associate's degree
31%
Bachelor's degree or higher
30%
Unknown
0%

Other Characteristics

Enrollment in means-tested programs
36%