Manuscript Details

Source

Wagner, M., & Spiker, D. (2001). Experiences and outcomes for children and families: Multisite Parents as Teachers evaluation. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International. http://www.sri.com/policy/cehs/publications/humanpub/patfinal.pdf.

Rating
Moderate
Model(s) Reviewed
Author Affiliation

None of the study authors are developers of this model.

Funding Sources

National Institute of Early Childhood Development and Education of the Office of Educational Research and Improvement, U.S. Department of Education; the Smith Richardson Foundation; the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation; and the Carnegie Corporation of New York.

Study Design

Design Attrition Baseline equivalence Confounding factors Valid, reliable measures?
Randomized controlled trial High Established on race/ethnicity, SES, and mother’s mental health. None
Notes

In 2020, HomVEE updated this review in two ways. First, HomVEE moved the finding "child treated for injury in the past year" from the Child Health domain to the Reductions in Child Maltreatment domain because the review initially misclassified it. HomVEE places findings related to medical care for injury and ingestions in the Reductions in Child Maltreatment domain. Second, HomVEE moved the finding "child was covered by health insurance" from the Child Health domain to the Family Economic Self-Sufficiency domain  because ACF determined that health insurance coverage belongs in that domain. 

Study Participants

The sample presented here includes 667 mothers with children who were assessed at 1 and 2 years of age. Across three sites, families with a child up to 8 months of age were recruited for enrollment in the Parents as Teachers (PAT) program. At the time of enrollment, mothers had an average education level of just over 12 years. Most study participants were African American (58%) or white (29%). The majority of households enrolled had an annual income of less than $15,000 (60%). Twenty-nine percent of children in the sample had two married parents.

Setting

Three local PAT programs participated in the evaluation: the first was located in an Eastern Seaboard rural community, the second was located in a mid-size Southern city, and the third was located in a large Western city.

Home Visiting Services

Families enrolled in PAT received monthly home visits and other program services for as long as they remained in the program, up to the child’s third birthday. Among those families enrolled in PAT , 44% participated and remained in the program through the child’s second birthday (68% at Site 1, 35% at Site 2, and 31% at Site 3).

Comparison Conditions

The comparison families received only the services that were normally available in the community and that they sought of their own accord. In addition, they received age-appropriate toys at regular quarterly intervals, which were used as a means of tracking their locations.

Subgroups examined

• Household income (less than $15,000 annually or $15,000 or more)

Findings that rate moderate or high in this manuscript

Positive parenting practices
Outcome measure Timing of follow-up Rating Effect size Stastical significance Sample size Sample description
HOME subscale related to language- and literacy-promoting behaviors (range = 0 to 8) 1-year assessment Moderate 0.08 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 343 mothers Three-site sample
PSOC satisfaction subscale (range = 9 to 36) 2-year assessment Moderate -0.05 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 267 mothers Three-site sample
Parental knowledge all items (percentage answered correctly) 1-year assessment Moderate -0.20 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 344 mothers Three-site sample
Parental knowledge general child development (percentage answered correctly) 1-year assessment Moderate 0.14 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 344 mothers Three-site sample
Parental knowledge language/cognitive development (percentage answered correctly) 1-year assessment Moderate -0.20 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 344 mothers Three-site sample
Parental knowledge emotional development (percentage answered correctly) 1-year assessment Moderate -0.12 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 344 mothers Three-site sample
Parental knowledge discipline (percentage answered correctly) 1-year assessment Moderate -0.02 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 344 mothers Three-site sample
Parental knowledge child care and safety (percentage answered correctly) 1-year assessment Moderate -0.09 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 344 mothers Three-site sample
PSOC total scale (range = 17 to 68) 1-year assessment Moderate -0.20 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 344 mothers Three-site sample
PSOC parenting efficacy subscale (range = 8 to 32) 1-year assessment Moderate -0.10 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 344 mothers Three-site sample
PSOC satisfaction subscale (range = 9 to 36) 1-year assessment Moderate -0.20 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 344 mothers Three-site sample
AAPI average child maltreatment precursor scale (range = 6 to 24) 1-year assessment Moderate 0.02 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 344 mothers Three-site sample
Parent Observation Scale (range 1 to 4; 4 = more observant) 1-year assessment Moderate -0.21 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 340 mothers Three-site sample
Language literacy numeracy promotion scale (range = 6 to 24) 1-year assessment Moderate 0.12 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 343 mothers Three-site sample
While doing everyday things parent talks to/asks child questions 1-year assessment Moderate 0.09 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 343 mothers Three-site sample
While doing everyday things parent reads aloud to child 1-year assessment Moderate 0.13 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 343 mothers Three-site sample
While doing everyday things parent counts things or uses numbers with child 1-year assessment Moderate -0.10 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 343 mothers Three-site sample
Parent tell stories sings with child 1-year assessment Moderate -0.02 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 343 mothers Three-site sample
Parent reads books with child 1-year assessment Moderate 0.07 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 327 mothers Three-site sample
Parent talks to/asks child questions during reading 1-year assessment Moderate 0.20 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 327 mothers Three-site sample
HOME total scale (range = 0 to 45) 1-year assessment Moderate -0.01 Not statistically significant,
p = 0.93
343 mothers Three-site sample
HOME subscale: parental responsivity 1-year assessment Moderate -0.02 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 343 mothers Three-site sample
HOME acceptance of child’s behavior subscale 1-year assessment Moderate -0.12 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 343 mothers Three-site sample
HOME organization of the environment subscale 1-year assessment Moderate 0.03 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 343 mothers Three-site sample
HOME appropriate play materials subscale 1-year assessment Moderate 0.06 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 343 mothers Three-site sample
HOME involvement with child subscale 1-year assessment Moderate -0.01 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 343 mothers Three-site sample
HOME opportunities for stimulation subscale 1-year assessment Moderate -0.02 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 343 mothers Three-site sample
Parental knowledge all items (percentage answered correctly) 2-year assessment Moderate 0.14 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 268 mothers Three-site sample
Parental knowledge general child development (percentage answered correctly) 2-year assessment Moderate 0.13 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 268 mothers Three-site sample
Parental knowledge language/cognitive development (percentage answered correctly) 2-year assessment Moderate 0.07 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 268 mothers Three-site sample
Parental knowledge emotional development (percentage answered correctly) 2-year assessment Moderate 0.24 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 268 mothers Three-site sample
Parental knowledge discipline (percentage answered correctly) 2-year assessment Moderate -0.02 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 268 mothers Three-site sample
Parental knowledge child care and safety (percentage answered correctly) 2-year assessment Moderate -0.01 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 268 mothers Three-site sample
PSOC total scale (range = 17 to 68) 2-year assessment Moderate -0.04 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 267 mothers Three-site sample
PSOC parenting efficacy subscale (range = 8 to 32) 2-year assessment Moderate 0.01 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 267 mothers Three-site sample
AAPI average child maltreatment precursor scale (range = 6 to 24) 2-year assessment Moderate 0.01 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 267 mothers Three-site sample
Parent Observation Scale (range 1 to 4; 4 = more observant) 2-year assessment Moderate 0.01 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 267 mothers Three-site sample
Language literacy numeracy promotion scale (range = 6 to 24) 2-year assessment Moderate 0.09 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 266 mothers Three-site sample
While doing everyday things parent talks to/asks child questions 2-year assessment Moderate -0.09 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 266 mothers Three-site sample
Effect rating key
Favorable finding / Statistically significant
UnFavorable finding / Statistically significant
Ambiguous finding / Statistically significant
No effect / Not statistically significant
Family economic self-sufficiency
Outcome measure Timing of follow-up Rating Effect size Stastical significance Sample size Sample description
Child covered by health insurance 2 year Moderate -0.13 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 265 children Three-site sample
Effect rating key
Favorable finding / Statistically significant
UnFavorable finding / Statistically significant
Ambiguous finding / Statistically significant
No effect / Not statistically significant
Child health
Outcome measure Timing of follow-up Rating Effect size Stastical significance Sample size Sample description
Child saw doctor for well-child care in past 6 months 2 year Moderate -0.14 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 265 children Three-site sample
Child was fully immunized 2 year Moderate 0.17 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 265 children Three-site sample
Child went to the emergency room 2 year Moderate -0.24 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 265 children Three-site sample
Effect rating key
Favorable finding / Statistically significant
UnFavorable finding / Statistically significant
Ambiguous finding / Statistically significant
No effect / Not statistically significant
Reductions in child maltreatment
Outcome measure Timing of follow-up Rating Effect size Stastical significance Sample size Sample description
Child treated for injury in the past year 2 year Moderate -0.20 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 265 children Three-site sample
Effect rating key
Favorable finding / Statistically significant
UnFavorable finding / Statistically significant
Ambiguous finding / Statistically significant
No effect / Not statistically significant
Child development and school readiness
Outcome measure Timing of follow-up Rating Effect size Stastical significance Sample size Sample description
DPII average months differential: cognitive development 2-year assessment Moderate -0.04 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 266 children Three-site sample
DPII average months differential: self-help development 2-year assessment Moderate 0.02 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 266 children Three-site sample
DPII average months differential: social development 2-year assessment Moderate -0.01 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 266 children Three-site sample
DPII average months differential: physical development 2-year assessment Moderate -0.01 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 266 children Three-site sample
DPII average months differential: communication development 2-year assessment Moderate 0.08 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 266 children Three-site sample
ASBI score 2-year assessment Moderate 0.21 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 259 children Three-site sample
Effect rating key
Favorable finding / Statistically significant
UnFavorable finding / Statistically significant
Ambiguous finding / Statistically significant
No effect / Not statistically significant

This study included participants with the following characteristics at enrollment:

Race/Ethnicity

The race and ethnicity categories may sum to more than 100 percent if Hispanic ethnicity was reported separately or respondents could select two or more race or ethnicity categories.

Black or African American
58.20%
White
29.40%
Unknown
12.40%

Maternal Education

Less than a high school diploma
36.90%
High school diploma or GED
63.10%

Other Characteristics

Enrollment in means-tested programs
63.20%