Manuscript Details

Source

Olds, D. L., Kitzman, H. J., Cole, R. E., Hanks, C. A., Arcoleo, K. J., Anson, E. A., Luckey, D. W., Knudtson, M. D., Henderson, C. R., Bondy, J., & Stevenson, A. J. (2010). Enduring effects of prenatal and infancy home visiting by nurses on maternal life course and government spending: Follow-up of a randomized trial among children at age 12 years. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 164(5), 419-424

High rating
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Note: Navigate to model page for more information about the home visiting model. See the study manuscript for more information about how the model was implemented in this study.

Author Affiliation

David L. Olds, a study author, is a developer of this model.

Funding Sources

This project was supported by grant 1R01MH68790-01 from the National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, and by grant 2004-52854-CO-JS0 from the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.

Study Design

Design Attrition Baseline equivalence Confounding factors Valid, reliable measures?
Randomized controlled trial Low

Established for race/ethnicity. Significant differences in SES, but controlled in analyses.

None

Not assessed in manuscripts reviewed under Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1
Notes

In 2020, HomVEE updated this review to remove three mother's partnership status/family structure findings from the Family Economic Self-Sufficiency domain because ACF determined that mother's partnership status is ineligible for review by HomVEE. 

Study Participants

The authors recruited women from the obstetric and pediatric care public system. A total of 743 pregnant women were enrolled and randomly assigned to treatment (228 women) or comparison (515 women). At the study’s onset, 92 percent of women in the sample were African American, 98.1 percent were unmarried, 64.1 percent were younger than 19 years, and 85 percent were living in households with incomes below the federal poverty threshold. For the 12-year follow-up, 594 women were interviewed. This sample is the same as that described in Kitzman et al. (2010) and reports on different outcomes from those described in that study.

Setting

Memphis, TN

Home Visiting Services

Mothers in the nurse-visited condition were provided home visiting from pregnancy through their child’s second birthday, and the same assessment and referrals and transportation services provided to those in the comparison group.

Note: Navigate to model page for more information about the home visiting model. See the study manuscript for more information about how the model was implemented in this study.

Comparison Conditions

Mothers in the comparison group were provided developmental screening and referral services for their child at age 6, 12, and 24 months, and free transportation for scheduled prenatal care.

Findings that rate moderate or high in this manuscript

Family economic self-sufficiency
Outcome measure Timing of follow-up Rating Direction of Effect Effect size (absolute value) Stastical significance Sample size Sample description

Time employed, in months

2 to 12 years

High
0.99

Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05

594 mothers

Nurse visited during pregnancy and infancy and development screening comparison (Memphis)

Time employed, in months

10 to 12 years

High
2.62

Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05

594 mothers

Nurse visited during pregnancy and infancy and development screening comparison (Memphis)

Use of food stamps

0 to 12 years

High
3.90

Statistically significant, p < .05

594 mothers

Nurse visited during pregnancy and infancy and development screening comparison (Memphis)

Use of food stamps

10 to 12 years

High
2.65

Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05

594 mothers

Nurse visited during pregnancy and infancy and development screening comparison (Memphis)

Use of AFDC-TANF

0 to 12 years

High
3.03

Statistically significant, p < .05

594 mothers

Nurse visited during pregnancy and infancy and development screening comparison (Memphis

Use of AFDC-TANF

10 to 12 years

High
13.10

Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05

594 mothers

Nurse visited during pregnancy and infancy and development screening comparison (Memphis)

Use of Medicaid

0 to 12 years

High
1.88

Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05

594 mothers

Nurse visited during pregnancy and infancy and development screening comparison (Memphis)

Use of Medicaid

10 to 12 years

High
0.81

Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05

594 mothers

Nurse visited during pregnancy and infancy and development screening comparison (Memphis)

Effect rating key
Favorable finding / Statistically significant
Unfavorable finding / Statistically significant
Ambiguous finding / Statistically significant
No effect / Not statistically significant
Reductions in juvenile delinquency, family violence, and crime
Outcome measure Timing of follow-up Rating Direction of Effect Effect size (absolute value) Stastical significance Sample size Sample description

Intimate partner violence

12-year follow-up

High
0.03

Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05

594 mothers

Nurse visited during pregnancy and infancy and development screening comparison (Memphis)

Mother jailed

12-year follow-up

High
0.02

Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05

594 mothers

Nurse visited during pregnancy and infancy and development screening comparison (Memphis)

Maternal arrests

0 to 12 years

High
0.32

Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05

594 mothers

Nurse visited during pregnancy and infancy and development screening comparison (Memphis)

Effect rating key
Favorable finding / Statistically significant
Unfavorable finding / Statistically significant
Ambiguous finding / Statistically significant
No effect / Not statistically significant
Reductions in child maltreatment
Outcome measure Timing of follow-up Rating Direction of Effect Effect size (absolute value) Stastical significance Sample size Sample description

Child foster care placements

0 to 12 years

High
0.72

Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05

594 mothers

Nurse visited during pregnancy and infancy and development screening comparison (Memphis)

Effect rating key
Favorable finding / Statistically significant
Unfavorable finding / Statistically significant
Ambiguous finding / Statistically significant
No effect / Not statistically significant
Maternal health
Outcome measure Timing of follow-up Rating Direction of Effect Effect size (absolute value) Stastical significance Sample size Sample description

Alcohol or other drug use

12-year follow-up

High
0.05

Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05

594 mothers

Nurse visited during pregnancy and infancy and development screening comparison (Memphis)

Role impairment due to alcohol or drug use

12-year follow-up

High

Statistically significant, p < .05

594 mothers

Nurse visited during pregnancy and infancy and development screening comparison (Memphis)

Symptoms of psychological distress (borderline/clinical vs. normal)

12-year follow-up

High
0.05

Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05

594 mothers

Nurse visited during pregnancy and infancy and development screening comparison (Memphis)

Cumulative subsequent births

0 to 12 years

High
1.69

Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05

594 mothers

Nurse visited during pregnancy and infancy and development screening comparison (Memphis)

Cumulative subsequent births

10 to 12 years

High
0.42

Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05

594 mothers

Nurse visited during pregnancy and infancy and development screening comparison (Memphis)

Pearlin Mastery Scale

6 months to 12 years

High
4.30

Statistically significant, p < .05

594 mothers

Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and development screening comparison (Memphis)

Pearlin Mastery Scale

12-year follow-up

High
2.80

Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05

594 mothers

Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and development screening comparison (Memphis)

Effect rating key
Favorable finding / Statistically significant
Unfavorable finding / Statistically significant
Ambiguous finding / Statistically significant
No effect / Not statistically significant