Manuscript Details

Source

DuMont, K., Kirkland, K., Mitchell-Herzfeld, S., Ehrhard-Dietzel, S., Rodriguez, M. L., Lee, E., ... & Greene, R. (2010). A randomized trial of Healthy Families New York (HFNY): Does home visiting prevent child maltreatment? Rensselaer, NY: New York State Office of Children & Family Services and Albany, NY: University of Albany, State University of New York.

Rating
High
Author Affiliation

None of the study authors are developers of this model.

Funding Sources

This research was supported by Award No: 2006-MU-MU-0002 awarded by the National Institute of Justice, U.S. Department of Justice.

Study Design

Design Attrition Baseline equivalence Confounding factors Valid, reliable measures?
Randomized controlled trial Low Established on race/ethnicity. None
Notes

In 2020, HomVEE updated this review to move the measures of withdrawn depressed, anxious depressed, and social problems (Child Behavior Checklist) from the Child Health domain to the Child Development and School Readiness domain because ACF determined that HomVEE should place all child mental and behavioral health outcomes in the Child Development and School Readiness domain. 

High rating applies to all outcomes except those with baseline differences that were not controlled. The moderate rating applies to the following outcomes: biological mother confirmed subject–sexual abuse, target child confirmed victim–sexual abuse, and nonviolent discipline prevalence (CTS-PC)

Study Participants

Community agencies, including prenatal care providers and hospitals, screened expectant parents and parents with an infant younger than three months of age who lived in high-risk target areas and who were considered to be at risk for child abuse or neglect. Women were selected for the study following the same screening and assessment procedures used to determine eligibility for Healthy Families New York (HFNY). Family assessment workers (FAWs) obtained informed consent from women before the administration of a well-established risk assessment tool. In total 1,254 mothers were randomly assigned (intervention, n = 621; control, n = 633), and 1,173 mothers (intervention, n = 579; control, n = 594) completed baseline interviews. Thirty-four percent of the mothers were white, non-Latina; 45 percent were African American, non-Latina; and 18 percent were Latina.

Setting

This study took place in three sites within the HFNY home visiting program.

Home Visiting Services

HFNY, which is based on the Healthy Families America (HFA) model, was established as a strengths-based, intensive home visitation program with the explicit goals of 1) promoting positive parenting skills and parent-child interaction; 2) preventing child abuse and neglect; 3) supporting optimal prenatal care, and child health and development; and 4) improving parent’s self-sufficiency.

Families are provided intensive home visitation services bi-weekly during the prenatal period, weekly until the child is at least six months old, and periodically thereafter based on the needs of the family until the child begins school or Head Start. Home visits typically emphasize content that is appropriate to the particular service level on which the family is currently assigned. For example, visits on the prenatal level focus on promoting adequate prenatal care and providing information regarding fetal development, as well as preparing the family for childbirth and providing instruction on the care and safety of a newborn. Postnatal visits focus primarily on promoting positive parent-child interactions, educating parents about child growth and development, and enhancing family functioning and self-sufficiency.

HFNY programs determine the most appropriate curricula to use during home visits based on the specific needs and characteristics of individual families. At all stages, home visitors provide support, education, information, and activities designed to promote healthy parenting behaviors and child growth, including proper nutrition, age-appropriate behaviors, and positive discipline strategies. Home visitors also help mothers access health care and other services as needed; identify and address issues regarding positive family functioning; and discuss childcare, education, training, and employment options.

Comparison Conditions

The control group was given information on and received referrals to appropriate services other than home visiting.

Subgroups examined

• Maternal age and parity (primiparous and age less than 20 years) • Child maltreatment (mother has at least one substantiated child protective services report)

Findings that rate moderate or high in this manuscript

Child development and school readiness
Outcome measure Timing of follow-up Rating Effect size Stastical significance Sample size Sample description
Percentage participating in a gifted program 7 year High Statistically significant, p < 0.05 897 mothers New York sample
Percentage receiving remedial services 7 year High Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 897 mothers New York sample
Percentage receiving special education 7 year High Statistically significant, p < 0.05 897 mothers New York sample
Percentage repeating a grade 7 year High Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 897 mothers New York sample
Percentage skipping school more than once 7 year High Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 897 mothers New York sample
Attention problems (CBCL) 7 year High 0.01 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 897 mothers New York sample
Anxious, depressed (CBCL) 7 year High -0.03 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 897 mothers New York sample
Withdrawn, depressed (CBCL) 7 year High -0.04 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 897 mothers New York sample
Social problems (CBCL) 7 year High -0.04 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 897 mothers New York sample
Rule-breaking behavior (CBCL) 7 year High 0.03 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 897 mothers New York sample
Aggressive behaviors (CBCL) 7 year High 0.04 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 897 mothers New York sample
Effect rating key
Favorable finding / Statistically significant
UnFavorable finding / Statistically significant
Ambiguous finding / Statistically significant
No effect / Not statistically significant
Reductions in child maltreatment
Outcome measure Timing of follow-up Rating Effect size Stastical significance Sample size Sample description
Biological mother or target child confirmed subject or victim of CPS report, cumulative rate 7 year High Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 1173 mothers New York sample
Biological mother confirmed subject—neglect, cumulative rate 7 year High Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 1173 mothers New York sample
Target child confirmed victim—neglect, cumulative rate 7 year High Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 1173 mothers New York sample
Biological mother confirmed subject—physical abuse, cumulative rate 7 year High Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 1173 mothers New York sample
Target child confirmed victim—physical abuse, cumulative rate 7 year High Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 1173 mothers New York sample
Foster care placement—target child, cumulative rate 7 year High Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 1173 mothers New York sample
Biological mother or target child confirmed subject or victim of CPS report, cumulative number 7 year High -0.01 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 1173 mothers New York sample
Biological mother confirmed subject, cumulative number 7 year High 0.00 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 1173 mothers New York sample
Target child confirmed victim, cumulative number 7 year High -0.02 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 1173 mothers New York sample
Psychological aggression prevalence(CTS-PC) 7 year High Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 897 mothers New York sample
Minor physical aggression prevalence(CTS-PC) 7 year High Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 897 mothers New York sample
Serious physical aggressionprevalence (CTS-PC) 7 year High Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 897 mothers New York sample
Neglect prevalence(CTS-PC) 7 year High Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 897 mothers New York sample
Non-violent discipline frequency(CTS-PC) 7 year High 0.14 Statistically significant, p < 0.05 897 mothers New York sample
Psychological aggression frequency(CTS-PC) 7 year High 0.01 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 897 mothers New York sample
Minor physical aggression frequency(CTS-PC) 7 year High -0.02 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 897 mothers New York sample
Serious physical abuse frequency(CTS-PC) 7 year High -0.20 Statistically significant, p < 0.05 897 mothers New York sample
Neglect frequency(CTS-PC) 7 year High 0.05 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 897 mothers New York sample
Biological mother confirmed subject—sexual abuse, cumulative rate 7 year High Statistically significant, p < 0.05 1173 mothers New York sample
Target child confirmed victim—sexual abuse, cumulative rate 7 year High Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 1173 mothers New York sample
Non-violent discipline prevalence)(CTS-PC) 7 year High Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 897 mothers New York sample
Effect rating key
Favorable finding / Statistically significant
UnFavorable finding / Statistically significant
Ambiguous finding / Statistically significant
No effect / Not statistically significant

This study included participants with the following characteristics at enrollment:

Race/Ethnicity

The race and ethnicity categories may sum to more than 100 percent if Hispanic ethnicity was reported separately or respondents could select two or more race or ethnicity categories.

Black or African American
47.90%
Hispanic or Latino
15.60%
White
34.60%
Unknown
3.00%

Maternal Education

High school diploma or GED
47.10%
Unknown
52.90%

Other Characteristics

Enrollment in means-tested programs
37.80%