Manuscript Details

Source

LeCroy, C. W., & Krysik, J. (2011). Randomized trial of the Healthy Families Arizona home visiting program. Children and Youth Services Review, 33(10), 1761–1766.
High rating
Author Affiliation

None of the authors is a developer of this model.

Funding Sources

Arizona Department of Economic Security

Study Design

Design Attrition Baseline equivalence Confounding factors Valid, reliable measures?
Randomized controlled trial Low Established on race/ethnicity. None
Notes
High rating applies to all outcomes except those with baseline differences that were not controlled. The moderate rating applies to the following outcomes: use of resources, emotional loneliness, and pathways to goals.
These outcomes are rated moderate due to baseline differences in these variables that were not controlled for in the analyses.
Study Participants

Following assessment, families meeting Healthy Families Arizona criteria were randomly assigned to the experimental group or the Child Development control group. A total of 195 families enrolled in the study and completed baseline interviews (98 in the experimental group and 97 in the control group). Eighty-five families in the experimental group and 86 families in the control group completed one-year interviews. Twenty-five percent of the mothers in the study were white and 74 percent were Hispanic.

Setting

The study took place in a single Healthy Families Arizona site in a large metropolitan area in the state.

Home Visiting Services

The Healthy Families Arizona program provides home visiting services to prenatal and new parents. The home visitor first establishes a trusting relationship with the family, then assists parents with their life circumstances, personal issues, parenting needs, and successful adaptation to new infants. Home visitors model good parenting behavior, review the child’s developmental progress, promote safety in the home, establish a medical home for the child, and provide emotional support to parents. They also address substance abuse, domestic violence, and mental health issues.

Comparison Conditions

Families assigned to the Child Development control group received assessment information about their child’s developmental progress in the context of a consistent and long-term positive relationship. Control group families were also offered opportunities to access services if desired.

Findings that rate moderate or high in this manuscript

Family economic self-sufficiency
Outcome measure Timing of follow-up Rating Direction of Effect Effect size (absolute value) Stastical significance Sample size Sample description
School or training for mother 12 months High
1.19 Statistically significant, p = 0.01 171 mothers Arizona sample
Effect rating key
Favorable finding / Statistically significant
UnFavorable finding / Statistically significant
Ambiguous finding / Statistically significant
No effect / Not statistically significant
Maternal health
Outcome measure Timing of follow-up Rating Direction of Effect Effect size (absolute value) Stastical significance Sample size Sample description
Alcohol use 6 months High
0.59 Not available 180 mothers Arizona sample
Using birth control 6 months High
0.03 Not statistically significant, p = 0.061 180 mothers Arizona sample
Alcohol use 12 months High
0.40 Statistically significant, p = 0.04 171 mothers Arizona sample
Using birth control 12 months High
Not statistically significant, p = 0.54 171 mothers Arizona sample
Emotional loneliness 6 months Moderate
0.01 Not statistically significant, p = 0.34 180 mothers Arizona sample
Pathways to goal 6 months Moderate
0.89 Not statistically significant, p =0.12 180 mothers Arizona sample
Use of resources 12 months Moderate
1.58 Statistically significant, p =0.001 171 mothers Arizona sample
Pathways to goal 12 months Moderate
1.69 Not statistically significant, p =0.87 171 mothers Arizona sample
Effect rating key
Favorable finding / Statistically significant
UnFavorable finding / Statistically significant
Ambiguous finding / Statistically significant
No effect / Not statistically significant
Linkages and referrals
Outcome measure Timing of follow-up Rating Direction of Effect Effect size (absolute value) Stastical significance Sample size Sample description
Use of resources 6 months Moderate
4.32 Statistically significant, p =0.007 180 mothers Arizona sample
Effect rating key
Favorable finding / Statistically significant
UnFavorable finding / Statistically significant
Ambiguous finding / Statistically significant
No effect / Not statistically significant
Positive parenting practices
Outcome measure Timing of follow-up Rating Direction of Effect Effect size (absolute value) Stastical significance Sample size Sample description
Inappropriate expectations 6 months High
0.22 Not statistically significant, p =0.10 180 mothers Arizona sample
Lack of empathy 6 months High
0.02 Not statistically significant, p = 0.54 180 mothers Arizona sample
Belief in corporal punishment 6 months High
0.15 Not statistically significant, p =0.12 180 mothers Arizona sample
Reversing roles 6 months High
0.17 Not statistically significant, p =0.32 180 mothers Arizona sample
Oppressing child's independence (AAPI-2) 6 months High
0.10 Not statistically significant, p =0.06 180 mothers Arizona sample
Safety practices 6 months High
3.00 Statistically significant, p = 0.04 180 mothers Arizona sample
Mother's reading 6 months High
1.62 Not statistically significant, p =0.28 180 mothers Arizona sample
Aggressive discipline 12 months High
2.43 Not statistically significant, p =0.10 168 mothers Arizona sample
Inappropriate expectations (AAPI-2) 12 months High
0.00 Not statistically significant, p =0.91 168 mothers Arizona sample
Lack of empathy (AAPI-2) 12 months High
0.04 Not statistically significant, p =0.91 168 mothers Arizona sample
Belief in corporal punishment (AAPI-2) 12 months High
0.03 Not statistically significant, p =0.63 168 mothers Arizona sample
Reversing roles (AAPI-2) 12 months High
Not statistically significant, p =0.33 168 mothers Arizona sample
Oppressing child's independence 12 months High
Not statistically significant, p =0.68 168 mothers Arizona sample
Safety practices 12 months High
1.17 Not statistically significant, p =0.42 168 mothers Arizona sample
Mother's reading 12 months High
0.27 Not statistically significant, p =0.85 168 mothers Arizona sample
Never shouted, yelled at child 12 months High
0.43 Statistically significant, p =0.02 168 mothers Arizona sample
Never called name, cursed 12 months High
0.26 Not statistically significant, p =0.33 168 mothers Arizona sample
Never smacked/threatened, hit 12 months High
0.16 Not statistically significant, p =0.30 168 mothers Arizona sample
Never slapped hand 12 months High
0.42 Statistically significant, p =0.03 168 mothers Arizona sample
Never spanked 12 months High
0.14 Not statistically significant, p =0.19 168 mothers Arizona sample
Never hit elsewhere 12 months High
0.68 Not statistically significant, p =0.28 168 mothers Arizona sample
Never slapped on face 12 months High
Not statistically significant, p =0.99 168 mothers Arizona sample
Never threw object at child 12 months High
Not statistically significant, p =0.32 168 mothers Arizona sample
Never pinched child 12 months High
1.12 Not statistically significant, p =0.15 168 mothers Arizona sample
Effect rating key
Favorable finding / Statistically significant
UnFavorable finding / Statistically significant
Ambiguous finding / Statistically significant
No effect / Not statistically significant
Reductions in juvenile delinquency, family violence, and crime
Outcome measure Timing of follow-up Rating Direction of Effect Effect size (absolute value) Stastical significance Sample size Sample description
Family violence 6 months Moderate
1.87 Not statistically significant, p =0.15 180 mothers Arizona sample
Family violence 12 months Moderate
1.12 Not statistically significant, p =0.37 168 mothers Arizona sample
Effect rating key
Favorable finding / Statistically significant
UnFavorable finding / Statistically significant
Ambiguous finding / Statistically significant
No effect / Not statistically significant