Manuscript Details

PFL Evaluation Team at the UCD Geary Institute. (2012). Preparing For Life early childhood intervention: Assessing the impact of Preparing For Life at twelve months. Dublin, Ireland: UCD Geary Institute.

High rating
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2
Study design characteristics contributing to rating
Design Attrition Baseline equivalence Confounding factors? Valid, reliable measures?
Randomized controlled trial Low

Not assessed for randomized controlled trials with low attrition

No

Yes

Notes from the review of this manuscript

Information on how certain measures were constructed and their reliability, information to satisfy the baseline equivalence requirement for findings with high attrition, and information on the regression imputation method were based on correspondence with the author. HomVEE's calculations for statistical significance are used because authors' calculations were based on one-tailed statistical tests. Several findings not reported in the tables below received a low rating because they had high attrition and did not satisfy the baseline requirement or failed to establish face validity and/or did not satisfy the reliability requirement. Findings about mothers’ civic engagement, partnership status, marital status, household size, the presence of grandparents, and whether the mother knows the baby’s weight are ineligible for review because they do not fall in one of HomVEE’s eligible outcome domains. Measures of the fathers’ income and employment status are ineligible for review because HomVEE does not review measures of family self-sufficiency for the father, unless the manuscript clearly indicates that the father resides in the household.

Several findings for the Ages and Stages Questionnaire, and for subscales of the MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventories, Brief Child-Toddler Social and Emotional Assessment, Developmental Profile-3, and Adult Adolescent Parenting Inventory 2, as well as findings about child's health and health problems, are duplicates of those reported in two peer-reviewed manuscripts: Doyle et. al (2015) and Doyle et. al (2017). These findings are reported under those peer-reviewed manuscripts.

Child Development and School Readiness
Outcome Measure Timing of Follow-Up Rating Direction of Effect Effect Size (Absolute Value) Stastical Significance Sample Size Sample Description
Ages and Stages Questionnaire (ASQ), Fine Motor Cut-off 12 months old High
0.07 Not statistically significant, p = 0.46 165 children High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample
Ages and Stages Questionnaire (ASQ), Gross Motor Cut-off 12 months old High
0.10 Not statistically significant, p = 0.56 165 children High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample
Ages and Stages Questionnaire (ASQ), Problem Solving Cut-off 12 months old High
0.17 Not statistically significant, p = 0.26 165 children High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample
Ages and Stages Questionnaire (ASQ), Problem Solving Score 12 months old High
0.01 Not statistically significant, p = 0.97 165 children High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample
Ages and Stages Questionnaire (ASQ), Social-Emotional Cut-off 12 months old High
0.09 Not statistically significant, p = 0.49 165 children High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample
Ages and Stages Questionnaire (ASQ), Standardised Total Score 12 months old High
0.13 Not statistically significant, p = 0.41 165 children High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample
Brief Child-Toddler Social and Emotional Assessment (BITSEA), Competence Score 12 months old High
0.16 Not statistically significant, p = 0.80 165 children High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample
Brief Child-Toddler Social and Emotional Assessment (BITSEA), Competence Score Cut-off 12 months old High
0.29 Not statistically significant, p = 0.07 165 children High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample
Brief Child-Toddler Social and Emotional Assessment (BITSEA), Problem Score Cut-off 12 months old High
0.05 Not statistically significant, p = 0.76 165 children High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample
Developmental Profile-3 (DP3), Cognitive Development Above Average Cut-off 12 months old High
0.04 Not statistically significant, p = 0.80 165 children High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample
Difficult Temperament (items adapted from Child Characteristics Questionnaire) 12 months old High
0.11 Not statistically significant, p = 0.47 165 children High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample
MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventories (CDI), First Communicative Gestures 12 months old High
0.37 Not statistically significant, p = 0.53 162 children High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample
MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventories (CDI), Vocabulary Words Produced 12 months old High
0.12 Not statistically significant, p = 0.98 165 children High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample
MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventories (CDI), Vocabulary Words Understood 12 months old High
0.15 Not statistically significant, p = 0.76 165 children High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample
Temperament and Atypical Behaviour Scale (TABS) Score, proportion at risk of atypical development 12 months old High
0.14 Not statistically significant, p = 0.35 165 children High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample
Temperament and Atypical Behaviour Scale (TABS) Score, total score (risk of atypical development above a score of 0) 12 months old High
0.14 Not statistically significant, p = 0.36 165 children High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample
Used any type of childcare 12 months old High
0.30 Not statistically significant, p = 0.05 163 children High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample
Used formal childcare 12 months old High
0.25 Not statistically significant, p = 0.12 163 children High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample
Effect rating key
Favorable finding / Statistically significant
Unfavorable finding / Statistically significant
Ambiguous finding / Statistically significant
No effect / Not statistically significant
Child Health
Outcome Measure Timing of Follow-Up Rating Direction of Effect Effect Size (Absolute Value) Stastical Significance Sample Size Sample Description
Ever vaccinated 12 months old High
0.16 Not statistically significant, p = 0.26 165 children High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample
How often the child eats dairy 12 months old High
0.29 Not statistically significant, p = 0.06 165 children High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample
How often the child eats fruits 12 months old High
0.01 Not statistically significant, p = 1.00 165 children High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample
How often the child eats grains 12 months old High
0.29 Not statistically significant, p = 0.07 165 children High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample
How often the child eats other food (for example, sweets, crisps, and chips) 12 months old High
0.19 Not statistically significant, p = 0.23 164 children High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample
How often the child eats protein 12 months old High
0.14 Not statistically significant, p = 0.40 165 children High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample
How often the child eats vegetables 12 months old High
0.01 Not statistically significant, p = 0.88 165 children High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample
Necessary immunisations at 12 months 12 months old High
0.31 Statistically significant, p = 0.04 165 children High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample
Sleeps undisturbed through the night 12 months old High
0.11 Not statistically significant, p = 0.49 165 children High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample
Effect rating key
Favorable finding / Statistically significant
Unfavorable finding / Statistically significant
Ambiguous finding / Statistically significant
No effect / Not statistically significant
Family Economic Self-Sufficiency
Outcome Measure Timing of Follow-Up Rating Direction of Effect Effect Size (Absolute Value) Stastical Significance Sample Size Sample Description
Equivalised weekly household income 12 months old High
0.01 Not statistically significant, p = 0.96 142 families High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample
Mother in paid employment 12 months old High
0.15 Not statistically significant, p = 0.36 163 mothers High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample
Mother long-term unemployed (greater than 12 months) 12 months old High
0.21 Not statistically significant, p = 0.20 162 mothers High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample
Mother unemployed 12 months old High
0.14 Not statistically significant, p = 0.33 164 mothers High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample
Receives social welfare payments 12 months old High
0.09 Not statistically significant, p = 0.51 163 families High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample
Saves regularly 12 months old High
0.06 Not statistically significant, p = 0.70 163 families High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample
Effect rating key
Favorable finding / Statistically significant
Unfavorable finding / Statistically significant
Ambiguous finding / Statistically significant
No effect / Not statistically significant
Linkages and Referrals
Outcome Measure Timing of Follow-Up Rating Direction of Effect Effect Size (Absolute Value) Stastical Significance Sample Size Sample Description
Social worker working with family 12 months old High
0.06 Not statistically significant, p = 0.78 165 children High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample
Effect rating key
Favorable finding / Statistically significant
Unfavorable finding / Statistically significant
Ambiguous finding / Statistically significant
No effect / Not statistically significant
Maternal Health
Outcome Measure Timing of Follow-Up Rating Direction of Effect Effect Size (Absolute Value) Stastical Significance Sample Size Sample Description
Below World Health Organisation - Five Well-Being Index (WHO-5) Score of 13 12 months old High
0.14 Not statistically significant, p = 0.36 165 mothers High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample
Below World Health Organisation - Five Well-Being Index (WHO-5) Score of 13 (0-6 months), difference-in-difference estimate 12 months old High
0.00 Not statistically significant, p = 1.00 165 mothers High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample
Consumed alcohol above recommended level 12 months old High
0.04 Not statistically significant, p = 0.84 159 mothers High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample
Currently pregnant 12 months old High
0.12 Not statistically significant, p = 0.56 165 mothers High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample
Drug use in past 6 months 12 months old High
0.07 Not statistically significant, p = 0.46 164 mothers High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample
Future Outlook Inventory (FOI) 12 months old High
0.06 Not statistically significant, p = 0.73 165 mothers High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample
Healthy Eating Scale (adapted from Shrivastava et al., 2013) 12 months old High
0.07 Not statistically significant, p = 0.68 163 mothers High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample
Less than 6 hours sleep per night 12 months old High
0.09 Not statistically significant, p = 0.52 162 mothers High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample
Maternal Efficacy Mean Score (combined Pearlin Self-Efficacy Scale and Parental Self-Efficacy) 12 months old High
0.13 Not statistically significant, p = 0.37 165 mothers High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample
Maternal Efficacy Mean Score (combined Pearlin Self-Efficacy Scale and Parental Self-Efficacy), difference-in-difference estimate 12 months old High
0.14 Not statistically significant, p = 0.37 165 mothers High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample
Meets friends daily 12 months old High
0.23 Not statistically significant, p = 0.15 164 mothers High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample
Number of general practitioner visits in past 6 months 12 months old High
0.09 Not statistically significant, p = 0.57 164 mothers High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample
Parental Self-Efficacy (adapted from Borkowski et al., 2001) 12 months old High
0.24 Not statistically significant, p = 0.13 165 mothers High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample
Parental Self-Efficacy (adapted from Borkowski et al., 2001), difference-in-difference estimate 12 months old High
0.02 Not statistically significant, p = 0.91 165 mothers High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample
Pearlin Self-Efficacy Scale, Mastery cut-off 12 months old High
0.07 Not statistically significant, p = 0.70 165 mothers High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample
Pearlin Self-Efficacy Scale, Mastery Mean Score 12 months old High
0.02 Not statistically significant, p = 0.91 165 mothers High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample
Pearlin Self-Efficacy Scale, Mastery Mean Score, difference-in-difference estimate 12 months old High
0.19 Not statistically significant, p = 0.23 165 mothers High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample
Regular exercise 12 months old High
0.03 Not statistically significant, p = 0.90 164 mothers High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample
Smoked in past 6 months 12 months old High
0.03 Not statistically significant, p = 0.90 164 mothers High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample
World Health Organisation - Five Well-Being Index (WHO-5) Percentage Score 12 months old High
0.05 Not statistically significant, p = 0.75 165 mothers High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample
World Health Organisation - Five Well-Being Index (WHO-5) Percentage Score (0-6 months), difference-in-difference estimate 12 months old High
0.06 Not statistically significant, p = 0.68 165 mothers High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample
Drank alcohol in past 6 months 12 months old High
0.36 Statistically significant, p = 0.04 164 mothers High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample
Effect rating key
Favorable finding / Statistically significant
Unfavorable finding / Statistically significant
Ambiguous finding / Statistically significant
No effect / Not statistically significant
Positive Parenting Practices
Outcome Measure Timing of Follow-Up Rating Direction of Effect Effect Size (Absolute Value) Stastical Significance Sample Size Sample Description
Adult Adolescent Parenting Inventory 2 (AAPI), Appropriate parent-child roles 12 months old High
0.02 Not statistically significant, p = 0.91 165 mothers High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample
Adult Adolescent Parenting Inventory 2 (AAPI), Belief in the use of inappropriate punishment- At risk cut-off 12 months old High
0.22 Not statistically significant, p = 0.63 165 mothers High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample
Adult Adolescent Parenting Inventory 2 (AAPI), Inappropriate parent-child roles- At risk cut-off 12 months old High
0.00 Not statistically significant, p = 1.00 165 mothers High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample
Adult Adolescent Parenting Inventory 2 (AAPI), Parental empathy 12 months old High
0.01 Not statistically significant, p = 0.98 165 mothers High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample
Adult Adolescent Parenting Inventory 2 (AAPI), Parental lack of empathy- At risk of cut-off 12 months old High
0.22 Not statistically significant, p = 0.16 165 mothers High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample
Adult Adolescent Parenting Inventory 2 (AAPI), Realistic parental expectations of children 12 months old High
0.09 Not statistically significant, p = 0.59 165 mothers High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample
Adult Adolescent Parenting Inventory 2 (AAPI), total number of scales at risk 12 months old High
0.00 Not statistically significant, p = 1.00 165 mothers High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample
Adult Adolescent Parenting Inventory 2 (AAPI), Total score 12 months old High
0.11 Not statistically significant, p = 0.47 165 mothers High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample
Adult Adolescent Parenting Inventory 2 (AAPI), Unrealistic parental expectations of children- At risk cut-off 12 months old High
0.06 Not statistically significant, p = 0.78 165 mothers High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample
Adult-Adolescent Parenting Inventory (AAPI), Appropriate parent-child roles, difference-in-difference estimate 12 months old High
0.08 Not statistically significant, p = 0.59 165 mothers High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample
Adult-Adolescent Parenting Inventory (AAPI), Belief in the use of appropriate punishment, difference-in-difference estimate 12 months old High
0.30 Not statistically significant, p = 0.054 165 mothers High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample
Adult-Adolescent Parenting Inventory (AAPI), Belief in the use of inappropriate punishment- At risk cut-off, difference-in-difference estimate 12 months old High
0.19 Not statistically significant, p = 0.23 165 mothers High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample
Adult-Adolescent Parenting Inventory (AAPI), Inappropriate parent-child roles- At risk cut-off, difference-in-difference estimate 12 months old High
0.15 Not statistically significant, p = 0.33 165 mothers High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample
Adult-Adolescent Parenting Inventory (AAPI), Parental empathy, difference-in-difference estimate 12 months old High
0.06 Not statistically significant, p = 0.69 165 mothers High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample
Adult-Adolescent Parenting Inventory (AAPI), Parental lack of empathy- At risk of cut-off, difference-in-difference estimate 12 months old High
0.33 Statistically significant, p = 0.04 165 mothers High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample
Adult-Adolescent Parenting Inventory (AAPI), Realistic parental expectations of children, difference-in-difference estimate 12 months old High
0.10 Not statistically significant, p = 0.52 165 mothers High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample
Adult-Adolescent Parenting Inventory (AAPI), Unrealistic parental expectations of children- At risk cut-off, difference-in-difference estimate 12 months old High
0.35 Statistically significant, p = 0.03 165 mothers High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample
Appropriateness of sleeping location 12 months old High
0.30 Not statistically significant, p = 0.09 162 children High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample
Family Environment Scale (FES), Cohesion Standard Score 12 months old High
0.27 Not statistically significant, p = 0.08 165 children High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample
Family Environment Scale (FES), Conflict Standard Score 12 months old High
0.09 Not statistically significant, p = 0.57 165 children High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample
Family Environment Scale (FES), Organisation Standard Score 12 months old High
0.14 Not statistically significant, p = 0.37 165 children High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample
Father has daily contact with child 12 months old High
0.01 Not statistically significant, p = 0.89 164 children High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample
Father part of child's life 12 months old High
0.17 Not statistically significant, p = 0.26 164 children High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample
Satisfied with father's involvement 12 months old High
0.04 Not statistically significant, p = 0.78 165 mothers High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample
Effect rating key
Favorable finding / Statistically significant
Unfavorable finding / Statistically significant
Ambiguous finding / Statistically significant
No effect / Not statistically significant

This study included participants with the following characteristics at enrollment:

Race/Ethnicity

Data not available

Maternal Education

Data not available

Other Characteristics

Data not available

This study included participants from the following locations:

  • State not reported or international
International Locations
Ireland
Study Participants

Study participants were pregnant women recruited in a maternity hospital or in the community. A total of 233 pregnant women were randomly assigned to either the Preparing for Life—Home Visiting group that received home visiting services (“high PFL”; 115 participants) or the comparison condition (“low PFL”; 118 participants) that did not receive home visiting services. The study included a total of 165 participants, 82 in the high PFL group and 83 in the low PFL comparison group. Outcomes were measured when the children in the sample were 12 months old. At intake, the average age of the mothers was 25. The percentage of mothers identifying as Irish was 96 percent, and 4 percent identified as Irish Traveller. About half of the women were first-time mothers.

Setting

The study took place in North Dublin, Ireland.

Intervention condition
Comparison Conditions

Participants in the low PFL (comparison) group did not have access to the home visiting services or tip sheets. The comparison group did, however, receive some of the same resources made available to the high PFL (intervention) group, including the package of safety items and toys. These participants had access to an information officer who met with participants before the child’s birth and at various intervals after birth and provided information on Preparing for Life community events and other local services. Participants in the comparison group had access to public health workshops, such as a stress-control program and a healthy food program.

Subgroups examined

• Child gender (boy or girl) • Parity (primiparous) • Relationship status (single parent) • Cognitive resources of mother (high or low as measured by the Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence) • Emotional well-being level of mother (high or low as measured by the World Health Organization Wellbeing Index) • Maternal substance use/disorder (smoked or drank during pregnancy) • Maternal familial risk (high as measured by a survey of household domestic risks)

Author Affiliation

Dr. Doyle and the Preparing for Life Evaluation team are affiliated with the University College Dublin Geary Institute for Public Policy. The authors were contracted by the home visiting model developers to evaluate Preparing for Life—Home Visiting.

Funding Sources

The Atlantic Philanthropies and the Department of Children and Youth Affairs (Ireland) supported the research.