Manuscript Details

Source

Peer reviewed?
Yes

Paul, I. M., Savage, J. S., Anzman-Frasca, S., Marini, M. E., Mindell, J. A., & Birch, L. L. (2016). INSIGHT responsive parenting intervention and infant sleep. Pediatrics, 138(1), 1-10. doi:10.1542/peds.2016-0762

High rating
Author Affiliation

The authors are affiliated with several universities, including Pennsylvania State University, and are developers of the INSIGHT program.

Funding Sources

This research was supported by Award Numbers R01DK088244 and UL1TR000127 from the National Institutes of Health and 2011-67001-30117 from the U.S. Department of Agriculture. The research was also supported by the Children’s Miracle Network at Penn State Health Children’s Hospital and the Penn State Clinical and Translational Science Institute.

 

 

Study Design

Design Attrition Baseline equivalence Confounding factors Valid, reliable measures?
Randomized controlled trial Low

Not assessed for randomized controlled trials with low attrition

No

Yes, details reported below for findings on valid, reliable outcomes that otherwise rate at least moderate

Notes

Information on sample sizes was obtained from Paul et al. (2014) and correspondence with the author. Information to characterize the statistical significance of some findings was based on correspondence with the author.

Study Participants

Study participants were mother and infant dyads recruited after delivery in one Pennsylvania hospital. To be eligible, dyads had to include full-term, singleton births, with infants of normal birth weight. Mothers were English-speaking, primiparous, and at least 20 years old. A total of 291 dyads were randomly assigned to either the Intervention Nurses Start Infants Growing on Healthy Trajectories (INSIGHT) intervention (145 dyads) or a comparison intervention (146 dyads). Mother–infant dyads were randomly assigned to the INSIGHT intervention or the comparison intervention two weeks after birth, and outcomes were measured until the children’s first birthday. In the study, 89 percent of mothers were White, 6 percent were Black, 3 percent were Asian, and 1 percent reported another race. Most mothers (56 percent) had annual household incomes between $25,000 and $99,000; 11 percent had annual household incomes below $25,000.

Setting

The study took place in Hershey, Pennsylvania.

Home Visiting Services

INSIGHT consisted of home visits conducted when infants were 3 to 4, 16, 28, and 40 weeks old, followed by annual clinic-based visits at 1, 2, and 3 years old. The curriculum taught parents to respond promptly and in developmentally appropriate ways to infant cues across four behavioral states (drowsy, sleepy, fussy, and alert/calm). Research nurses provided parents with developmentally appropriate sleep guidance during each visit. The guidance addressed bedtime routines, sleep location, and night waking. During and between visits, caregivers were provided with information and resources on responsive feeding, lactation support, soothing practices, and home safety (including crib safety and choking hazards). When infants were 2 weeks old, participants received a mailed packet with information on infant feeding.

Comparison Conditions

Families assigned to the comparison condition were not eligible to receive intervention services through the INSIGHT program. However, these families received a similar number of home visits as the INSIGHT group (when infants were 3 to 4, 16, 28, and 40 weeks old) and annual clinic-based visits at 1, 2, and 3 years old. The home visits focused solely on home safety topics, including crib safety. When infants were 2 weeks old, participants received a mailed packet with information on infant feeding.

Were any subgroups examined?
No
Subgroups examined

There were no subgroups reported in this manuscript.

Study Participants

Study participants were mother and infant dyads recruited after delivery in one Pennsylvania hospital. To be eligible, dyads had to include full-term, singleton births, with infants of normal birth weight. Mothers were English-speaking, primiparous, and at least 20 years old. A total of 291 dyads were randomly assigned to either the Intervention Nurses Start Infants Growing on Healthy Trajectories (INSIGHT) intervention (145 dyads) or a comparison intervention (146 dyads). Mother–infant dyads were randomly assigned to the INSIGHT intervention or the comparison intervention two weeks after birth, and outcomes were measured until the children’s first birthday. In the study, 89 percent of mothers were White, 6 percent were Black, 3 percent were Asian, and 1 percent reported another race. Most mothers (56 percent) had annual household incomes between $25,000 and $99,000; 11 percent had annual household incomes below $25,000.

Setting

The study took place in Hershey, Pennsylvania.

Home Visiting Services

INSIGHT consisted of home visits conducted when infants were 3 to 4, 16, 28, and 40 weeks old, followed by annual clinic-based visits at 1, 2, and 3 years old. The curriculum taught parents to respond promptly and in developmentally appropriate ways to infant cues across four behavioral states (drowsy, sleepy, fussy, and alert/calm). Research nurses provided parents with developmentally appropriate sleep guidance during each visit. The guidance addressed bedtime routines, sleep location, and night waking. During and between visits, caregivers were provided with information and resources on responsive feeding, lactation support, soothing practices, and home safety (including crib safety and choking hazards). When infants were 2 weeks old, participants received a mailed packet with information on infant feeding.

Comparison Conditions

Families assigned to the comparison condition were not eligible to receive intervention services through the INSIGHT program. However, these families received a similar number of home visits as the INSIGHT group (when infants were 3 to 4, 16, 28, and 40 weeks old) and annual clinic-based visits at 1, 2, and 3 years old. The home visits focused solely on home safety topics, including crib safety. When infants were 2 weeks old, participants received a mailed packet with information on infant feeding.

Were any subgroups examined?
No
Subgroups examined

There were no subgroups reported in this manuscript.

Findings that rate moderate or high in this manuscript

Positive parenting practices
Outcome measure Timing of follow-up Rating Direction of Effect Effect size (absolute value) Stastical significance Sample size Sample description

Bedtime routine: duration less than or equal to 45 minutes

16 weeks old

High
0.35

Statistically significant, p= 0.03

262 mother/child dyads

INSIGHT vs. comparison, Pennsylvania 2012-2014, full sample

Bedtime routine: read book

16 weeks old

High
0.50

Statistically significant, p <.01

262 mother/child dyads

INSIGHT vs. comparison, Pennsylvania 2012-2014, full sample

Bedtime routine: rocking

16 weeks old

High
0.21

Not statistically significant, p= 0.23

262 mother/child dyads

INSIGHT vs. comparison, Pennsylvania 2012-2014, full sample

Bedtime routine: bath

16 weeks old

High
0.15

Not statistically significant, p= 0.34

262 mother/child dyads

INSIGHT vs. comparison, Pennsylvania 2012-2014, full sample

Bedtime routine: music

16 weeks old

High
0.06

Not statistically significant, p= 0.57

262 mother/child dyads

INSIGHT vs. comparison, Pennsylvania 2012-2014, full sample

Bedtime routine: watch television

16 weeks old

High
0.06

Not statistically significant, p= 0.93

262 mother/child dyads

INSIGHT vs. comparison, Pennsylvania 2012-2014, full sample

Bedtime routine: bottle feed/breastfeed

16 weeks old

High
0.34

Not statistically significant, p= 0.16

262 mother/child dyads

INSIGHT vs. comparison, Pennsylvania 2012-2014, full sample

Bedtime routine: fed as last activity before bed

16 weeks old

High
0.59

Statistically significant, p <.01

262 mother/child dyads

INSIGHT vs. comparison, Pennsylvania 2012-2014, full sample

Bedtime routine: cereal in bottle

16 weeks old

High
0.23

Not statistically significant, p= 0.37

262 mother/child dyads

INSIGHT vs. comparison, Pennsylvania 2012-2014, full sample

Bedtime 8 PM or earlier

16 weeks old

High
0.60

Statistically significant, p <.01

262 infants

INSIGHT vs. comparison, Pennsylvania 2012-2014, full sample

Sleeps in own room

16 weeks old

High
0.10

Not statistically significant, p= 0.65

262 infants

INSIGHT vs. comparison, Pennsylvania 2012-2014, full sample

Falls asleep swaddled

16 weeks old

High
0.41

Statistically significant, p= 0.01

262 infants

INSIGHT vs. comparison, Pennsylvania 2012-2014, full sample

Falls asleep with pacifier

16 weeks old

High
0.14

Not statistically significant, p= 0.46

262 infants

INSIGHT vs. comparison, Pennsylvania 2012-2014, full sample

Falls asleep with white noise

16 weeks old

High
0.15

Not statistically significant, p= 0.42

262 infants

INSIGHT vs. comparison, Pennsylvania 2012-2014, full sample

Falls asleep being held

16 weeks old

High
0.30

Not statistically significant, p= 0.06

262 infants

INSIGHT vs. comparison, Pennsylvania 2012-2014, full sample

Falls asleep alone in room, in crib (self-soothes)

16 weeks old

High
0.43

Statistically significant, p= 0.01

262 infants

INSIGHT vs. comparison, Pennsylvania 2012-2014, full sample

Falls asleep in less than or equal to 15 minutes

16 weeks old

High
0.28

Not statistically significant, p= 0.07

262 infants

INSIGHT vs. comparison, Pennsylvania 2012-2014, full sample

Greater than or equal to 2 wakings per night

16 weeks old

High
0.11

Not statistically significant, p= 0.53

262 infants

INSIGHT vs. comparison, Pennsylvania 2012-2014, full sample

Greater than or equal to 2 night feedings

16 weeks old

High
0.11

Not statistically significant, p= 0.50

262 infants

INSIGHT vs. comparison, Pennsylvania 2012-2014, full sample

Night waking: give few minutes to fall back to sleep

16 weeks old

High
0.27

Not statistically significant, p= 0.09

262 mothers

INSIGHT vs. comparison, Pennsylvania 2012-2014, full sample

Night waking: pick up and hold/rock back to sleep

16 weeks old

High
0.03

Not statistically significant, p= 0.76

262 mothers

INSIGHT vs. comparison, Pennsylvania 2012-2014, full sample

Night waking: rub/pat but do not pick up

16 weeks old

High
0.18

Not statistically significant, p= 0.29

262 mothers

INSIGHT vs. comparison, Pennsylvania 2012-2014, full sample

Night waking: feed back to sleep

16 weeks old

High
0.48

Statistically significant, p <.01

262 mothers

INSIGHT vs. comparison, Pennsylvania 2012-2014, full sample

Night waking: give pacifier

16 weeks old

High
0.08

Not statistically significant, p= 0.50

262 mothers

INSIGHT vs. comparison, Pennsylvania 2012-2014, full sample

Night waking: change diaper

16 weeks old

High
0.03

Not statistically significant, p= 0.86

262 mothers

INSIGHT vs. comparison, Pennsylvania 2012-2014, full sample

Dream feeds: nighttime feeding initiated by parent

16 weeks old

High
0.61

Statistically significant, p <.01

262 mothers

INSIGHT vs. comparison, Pennsylvania 2012-2014, full sample

Bedtime routine: duration less than or equal to 45 minutes

40 weeks old

High
0.32

Statistically significant, p= 0.04

251 mother/child dyads

INSIGHT vs. comparison, Pennsylvania 2012-2014, full sample

Bedtime routine: read book

40 weeks old

High
0.30

Not statistically significant, p= 0.05

251 mother/child dyads

INSIGHT vs. comparison, Pennsylvania 2012-2014, full sample

Bedtime routine: rocking

40 weeks old

High
0.00

Not statistically significant, p= 0.89

251 mother/child dyads

INSIGHT vs. comparison, Pennsylvania 2012-2014, full sample

Bedtime routine: bath

40 weeks old

High
0.08

Not statistically significant, p= 0.65

251 mother/child dyads

INSIGHT vs. comparison, Pennsylvania 2012-2014, full sample

Bedtime routine: music

40 weeks old

High
0.10

Not statistically significant, p= 0.59

251 mother/child dyads

INSIGHT vs. comparison, Pennsylvania 2012-2014, full sample

Bedtime routine: watch television

40 weeks old

High
0.36

Not statistically significant, p= 0.13

251 mother/child dyads

INSIGHT vs. comparison, Pennsylvania 2012-2014, full sample

Bedtime routine: bottle feed/breastfeed

40 weeks old

High
0.08

Not statistically significant, p= 0.85

251 mother/child dyads

INSIGHT vs. comparison, Pennsylvania 2012-2014, full sample

Bedtime routine: fed as last activity before bed

40 weeks old

High
0.34

Not statistically significant, p= 0.05

251 mother/child dyads

INSIGHT vs. comparison, Pennsylvania 2012-2014, full sample

Bedtime routine: cereal in bottle

40 weeks old

High
0.05

Not statistically significant, p= 0.86

251 mother/child dyads

INSIGHT vs. comparison, Pennsylvania 2012-2014, full sample

Bedtime 8 PM or earlier

40 weeks old

High
0.47

Statistically significant, p <.01

251 infants

INSIGHT vs. comparison, Pennsylvania 2012-2014, full sample

Sleeps in own room

40 weeks old

High
0.12

Not statistically significant, p= 0.37

251 infants

INSIGHT vs. comparison, Pennsylvania 2012-2014, full sample

Falls asleep swaddled

40 weeks old

High
0.43

Not statistically significant, p= 0.57

251 infants

INSIGHT vs. comparison, Pennsylvania 2012-2014, full sample

Falls asleep with pacifier

40 weeks old

High
0.08

Not statistically significant, p= 0.66

251 infants

INSIGHT vs. comparison, Pennsylvania 2012-2014, full sample

Falls asleep with white noise

40 weeks old

High
0.40

Statistically significant, p= 0.02

251 infants

INSIGHT vs. comparison, Pennsylvania 2012-2014, full sample

Falls asleep being held

40 weeks old

High
0.51

Statistically significant, p <.01

251 infants

INSIGHT vs. comparison, Pennsylvania 2012-2014, full sample

Falls asleep alone in room, in crib (self-soothes)

40 weeks old

High
0.32

Statistically significant, p= 0.04

251 infants

INSIGHT vs. comparison, Pennsylvania 2012-2014, full sample

Falls asleep in less than or equal to 15 minutes

40 weeks old

High
0.32

Not statistically significant, p= 0.06

251 infants

INSIGHT vs. comparison, Pennsylvania 2012-2014, full sample

Greater than or equal to 2 wakings per night

40 weeks old

High
0.12

Not statistically significant, p= 0.50

251 infants

INSIGHT vs. comparison, Pennsylvania 2012-2014, full sample

Greater than or equal to 2 night feedings

40 weeks old

High
0.05

Not statistically significant, p= 0.70

251 infants

INSIGHT vs. comparison, Pennsylvania 2012-2014, full sample

Give few minutes to fall back to sleep

40 weeks old

High
0.02

Not statistically significant, p= 0.93

251 mothers

INSIGHT vs. comparison, Pennsylvania 2012-2014, full sample

Night waking: pick up and hold/rock back to sleep

40 weeks old

High
0.38

Statistically significant, p= 0.02

251 mothers

INSIGHT vs. comparison, Pennsylvania 2012-2014, full sample

Night waking: rub/pat but do not pick up

40 weeks old

High
0.55

Statistically significant, p <.01

251 mothers

INSIGHT vs. comparison, Pennsylvania 2012-2014, full sample

Night waking: feed back to sleep

40 weeks old

High
0.48

Statistically significant, p= 0.01

251 mothers

INSIGHT vs. comparison, Pennsylvania 2012-2014, full sample

Night waking: give pacifier

40 weeks old

High
0.13

Not statistically significant, p= 0.42

251 mothers

INSIGHT vs. comparison, Pennsylvania 2012-2014, full sample

Night waking: change diaper

40 weeks old

High
0.05

Not statistically significant, p= 0.82

251 mothers

INSIGHT vs. comparison, Pennsylvania 2012-2014, full sample

Dream feeds: nighttime feeding initiated by parent

40 weeks old

High
0.67

Statistically significant, p <.01

251 mothers

INSIGHT vs. comparison, Pennsylvania 2012-2014, full sample

Put to bed for the night while still awake

8 weeks old

High
0.63

Statistically significant, p <.01

257 infants

INSIGHT vs. comparison, Pennsylvania 2012-2014, full sample

Bedtime 8 PM or earlier

1 year old

High
0.22

Not statistically significant, p= 0.11

245 infants

INSIGHT vs. comparison, Pennsylvania 2012-2014, full sample

Same bedtime routine every night

1 year old

High
0.52

Statistically significant, p <.01

244 infants

INSIGHT vs. comparison, Pennsylvania 2012-2014, full sample

Bedtime Routines Questionnaire (BRQ): Overall score

1 year old

High

Statistically significant, p= 0.02

242 infants

INSIGHT vs. comparison, Pennsylvania 2012-2014, full sample

Bedtime Routines Questionnaire (BRQ): Routine Behaviors subscale

1 year old

High

Not statistically significant, p= 0.05

242 infants

INSIGHT vs. comparison, Pennsylvania 2012-2014, full sample

Bedtime Routines Questionnaire (BRQ): Routine Environment subscale

1 year old

High

Statistically significant, p= 0.03

242 infants

INSIGHT vs. comparison, Pennsylvania 2012-2014, full sample

Effect rating key
Favorable finding / Statistically significant
UnFavorable finding / Statistically significant
Ambiguous finding / Statistically significant
No effect / Not statistically significant
Child health
Outcome measure Timing of follow-up Rating Direction of Effect Effect size (absolute value) Stastical significance Sample size Sample description

Total daily sleep duration (minutes)

8 weeks old

High
0.20

Not statistically significant, p= 0.10

248 infants

INSIGHT vs. comparison, Pennsylvania 2012-2014, full sample

Overnight sleep duration (minutes)

8 weeks old

High
0.42

Statistically significant, p <.01

252 infants

INSIGHT vs. comparison, Pennsylvania 2012-2014, full sample

Total daily sleep duration (minutes)

16 weeks old

High
0.21

Not statistically significant, p= 0.08

262 infants

INSIGHT vs. comparison, Pennsylvania 2012-2014, full sample

Overnight sleep duration (minutes)

16 weeks old

High
0.31

Statistically significant, p= 0.01

262 infants

INSIGHT vs. comparison, Pennsylvania 2012-2014, full sample

Total daily sleep duration (minutes)

40 weeks old

High

Not statistically significant, p >.05

251 infants

INSIGHT vs. comparison, Pennsylvania 2012-2014, full sample

Overnight sleep duration (minutes)

40 weeks old

High
0.30

Statistically significant, p= 0.01

251 infants

INSIGHT vs. comparison, Pennsylvania 2012-2014, full sample

Daytime sleep duration (minutes)

8 weeks old

High

Not statistically significant, p >.05

252 infants

INSIGHT vs. comparison, Pennsylvania 2012-2014, full sample

Daytime sleep duration (minutes)

16 weeks old

High

Not statistically significant, p >.05

262 infants

INSIGHT vs. comparison, Pennsylvania 2012-2014, full sample

Daytime sleep duration (minutes)

40 weeks old

High

Not statistically significant, p >.05

251 infants

INSIGHT vs. comparison, Pennsylvania 2012-2014, full sample

Daytime sleep duration (minutes)

1 year old

High

Not statistically significant, p >.05

245 infants

INSIGHT vs. comparison, Pennsylvania 2012-2014, full sample

Overnight sleep duration (minutes)

1 year old

High

Not statistically significant, p >.05

245 infants

INSIGHT vs. comparison, Pennsylvania 2012-2014, full sample

Sleep 12 to 14 hours per day

1 year old

High
0.38

Not statistically significant, p >.05

245 infants

INSIGHT vs. comparison, Pennsylvania 2012-2014, full sample

Effect rating key
Favorable finding / Statistically significant
UnFavorable finding / Statistically significant
Ambiguous finding / Statistically significant
No effect / Not statistically significant

This study included participants with the following characteristics at enrollment:

Race/Ethnicity

The race and ethnicity categories may sum to more than 100 percent if Hispanic ethnicity was reported separately or respondents could select two or more race or ethnicity categories.

Asian
3%
Black or African American
6%
Hispanic or Latino
7%
Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander
0%
White
89%
Unknown
1%

Maternal Education

Some college or Associate's degree
26%
Bachelor's degree or higher
62%
Unknown
12%

Other Characteristics

Indigenous population
0%