Manuscript Details

O'Sullivan, A., Fitzpatrick, N., & Doyle, O. (2017). Effects of early intervention on dietary intake and its mediating role on cognitive functioning: A randomised controlled trial. Public Health Nutrition, 20(1), 154-164.

Peer Reviewed

High rating
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2
Study design characteristics contributing to rating
Design Attrition Baseline equivalence Confounding factors? Valid, reliable measures?
Randomized controlled trial Low

Not assessed for randomized controlled trials with low attrition

No

Yes

Notes from the review of this manuscript

Information required to satisfy the baseline equivalence requirement for findings with high attrition were based on correspondence with the author. Findings reported when children in the sample were 36 months old are ineligible for review because high PFL families were offered Triple P, a parenting course promoting healthy parenting practices and positive parent-child attachment, when children were between 24 and 36 months old, and the low PFL group was not offered these services. Several findings measured at 18 months not reported in the tables below received a low rating because they had high attrition and did not satisfy the baseline equivalence requirement.

Child Development and School Readiness
Outcome Measure Timing of Follow-Up Rating Direction of Effect Effect Size (Absolute Value) Stastical Significance Sample Size Sample Description
Developmental Profile-3: Cognitive section 24 months old High
0.29 Not statistically significant, p= 0.06 165 children High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample
Effect rating key
Favorable finding / Statistically significant
Unfavorable finding / Statistically significant
Ambiguous finding / Statistically significant
No effect / Not statistically significant
Child Health
Outcome Measure Timing of Follow-Up Rating Direction of Effect Effect Size (Absolute Value) Stastical Significance Sample Size Sample Description
Child eats fatty/sugary food less than once daily, adjusted for baseline controls 12 months old High
0.15 Not statistically significant, p= 0.34 165 children High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample
Child eats fatty/sugary food less than once daily, adjusted for baseline controls 24 months old High
0.27 Not statistically significant, p= 0.22 165 children High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample
Child eats fatty/sugary food less than once daily, Inverse Probability Weighted results 12 months old High
0.12 Not statistically significant, p= 0.57 165 children High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample
Child eats fatty/sugary food less than once daily, Inverse Probability Weighted results 24 months old High
0.25 Not statistically significant, p= 0.20 165 children High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample
Child eats fatty/sugary food less than once daily, Multiple Imputation results 12 months old High
0.15 Not statistically significant, p= 0.48 207 children High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample
Child eats fatty/sugary food less than once daily, Multiple Imputation results 18 months old High
0.01 Not statistically significant, p= 0.87 207 children High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample
Child eats fatty/sugary food less than once daily, Multiple Imputation results 24 months old High
0.28 Not statistically significant, p= 0.16 207 children High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample
Child eats fatty/sugary food less than once daily, unweighted 12 months old High
0.16 Not statistically significant, p= 0.41 165 children High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample
Child eats fatty/sugary food less than once daily, unweighted 24 months old High
0.25 Not statistically significant, p= 0.18 165 children High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample
Child meets all daily diet recommendations, adjusted for baseline controls 12 months old High
0.14 Not statistically significant, p= 0.79 165 children High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample
Child meets all daily diet recommendations, adjusted for baseline controls 24 months old High
0.78 Statistically significant, p= 0.04 165 children High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample
Child meets all daily diet recommendations, Inverse Probability Weighted results 12 months old High
0.23 Not statistically significant, p= 0.63 165 children High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample
Child meets all daily diet recommendations, Inverse Probability Weighted results 24 months old High
0.83 Statistically significant, p= 0.02 165 children High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample
Child meets all daily diet recommendations, Multiple Imputation results 12 months old High
0.13 Not statistically significant, p= 0.79 207 children High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample
Child meets all daily diet recommendations, Multiple Imputation results 18 months old High
0.26 Not statistically significant, p= 0.41 207 children High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample
Child meets all daily diet recommendations, Multiple Imputation results 24 months old High
0.67 Not statistically significant, p= 0.06 207 children High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample
Child meets all daily diet recommendations, unweighted 12 months old High
0.19 Not statistically significant, p= 0.69 165 children High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample
Child meets all daily diet recommendations, unweighted 24 months old High
0.81 Statistically significant, p= 0.02 165 children High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample
Child meets recommended number of daily servings for dairy, adjusted for baseline controls 12 months old High
0.35 Not statistically significant, p= 0.05 165 children High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample
Child meets recommended number of daily servings for dairy, adjusted for baseline controls 24 months old High
0.08 Not statistically significant, p= 0.55 165 children High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample
Child meets recommended number of daily servings for dairy, Inverse Probability Weighted results 12 months old High
0.34 Not statistically significant, p= 0.10 165 children High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample
Child meets recommended number of daily servings for dairy, Inverse Probability Weighted results 24 months old High
0.10 Not statistically significant, p= 0.64 165 children High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample
Child meets recommended number of daily servings for dairy, Multiple Imputation results 12 months old High
0.41 Statistically significant, p= 0.046 207 children High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample
Child meets recommended number of daily servings for dairy, Multiple Imputation results 18 months old High
0.31 Not statistically significant, p= 0.10 207 children High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample
Child meets recommended number of daily servings for dairy, Multiple Imputation results 24 months old High
0.05 Not statistically significant, p= 0.84 207 children High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample
Child meets recommended number of daily servings for dairy, unweighted 12 months old High
0.38 Statistically significant, p= <0.05 165 children High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample
Child meets recommended number of daily servings for dairy, unweighted 24 months old High
0.09 Not statistically significant, p= 0.64 165 children High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample
Child meets recommended number of daily servings for fruits and vegetables, adjusted for baseline controls 12 months old High
0.21 Not statistically significant, p= 0.21 165 children High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample
Child meets recommended number of daily servings for fruits and vegetables, adjusted for baseline controls 24 months old High
0.43 Statistically significant, p= 0.04 165 children High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample
Child meets recommended number of daily servings for fruits and vegetables, Inverse Probability Weighted results 12 months old High
0.24 Not statistically significant, p= 0.30 165 children High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample
Child meets recommended number of daily servings for fruits and vegetables, Inverse Probability Weighted results 24 months old High
0.36 Not statistically significant, p= 0.09 165 children High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample
Child meets recommended number of daily servings for fruits and vegetables, Multiple Imputation results 12 months old High
0.28 Not statistically significant, p= 0.22 207 children High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample
Child meets recommended number of daily servings for fruits and vegetables, Multiple Imputation results 18 months old High
0.28 Not statistically significant, p= 0.19 207 children High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample
Child meets recommended number of daily servings for fruits and vegetables, Multiple Imputation results 24 months old High
0.40 Not statistically significant, p= 0.05 207 children High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample
Child meets recommended number of daily servings for fruits and vegetables, unweighted 12 months old High
0.24 Not statistically significant, p= 0.29 165 children High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample
Child meets recommended number of daily servings for fruits and vegetables, unweighted 24 months old High
0.50 Statistically significant, p= 0.02 165 children High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample
Child meets recommended number of daily servings for grains, adjusted for baseline controls 12 months old High
0.27 Not statistically significant, p= 0.14 165 children High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample
Child meets recommended number of daily servings for grains, adjusted for baseline controls 24 months old High
0.25 Not statistically significant, p= 0.28 165 children High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample
Child meets recommended number of daily servings for grains, Inverse Probability Weighted results 12 months old High
0.31 Not statistically significant, p= 0.13 165 children High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample
Child meets recommended number of daily servings for grains, Inverse Probability Weighted results 24 months old High
0.22 Not statistically significant, p= 0.28 165 children High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample
Child meets recommended number of daily servings for grains, Multiple Imputation results 12 months old High
0.35 Statistically significant, p= 0.049 207 children High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample
Child meets recommended number of daily servings for grains, Multiple Imputation results 18 months old High
0.35 Not statistically significant, p= 0.10 207 children High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample
Child meets recommended number of daily servings for grains, Multiple Imputation results 24 months old High
0.13 Not statistically significant, p= 0.37 207 children High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample
Child meets recommended number of daily servings for grains, unweighted 12 months old High
0.28 Not statistically significant, p= 0.14 165 children High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample
Child meets recommended number of daily servings for grains, unweighted 24 months old High
0.23 Not statistically significant, p= 0.22 165 children High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample
Child meets recommended number of daily servings for protein, adjusted for baseline controls 12 months old High
0.00 Not statistically significant, p= 0.97 165 children High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample
Child meets recommended number of daily servings for protein, adjusted for baseline controls 24 months old High
0.49 Statistically significant, p= 0.02 165 children High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample
Child meets recommended number of daily servings for protein, Inverse Probability Weighted results 12 months old High
0.06 Not statistically significant, p= 0.82 165 children High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample
Child meets recommended number of daily servings for protein, Inverse Probability Weighted results 24 months old High
0.56 Statistically significant, p= 0.02 165 children High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample
Child meets recommended number of daily servings for protein, Multiple Imputation results 12 months old High
0.02 Not statistically significant, p= 0.87 207 children High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample
Child meets recommended number of daily servings for protein, Multiple Imputation results 18 months old High
0.25 Not statistically significant, p= 0.28 207 children High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample
Child meets recommended number of daily servings for protein, Multiple Imputation results 24 months old High
0.50 Statistically significant, p= 0.03 207 children High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample
Child meets recommended number of daily servings for protein, unweighted 12 months old High
0.04 Not statistically significant, p= 0.87 165 children High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample
Child meets recommended number of daily servings for protein, unweighted 24 months old High
0.50 Statistically significant, p= 0.02 165 children High PFL vs. Low PFL; Dublin, Ireland 2008-2010; full sample
Effect rating key
Favorable finding / Statistically significant
Unfavorable finding / Statistically significant
Ambiguous finding / Statistically significant
No effect / Not statistically significant

This study included participants with the following characteristics at enrollment:

Race/Ethnicity

Data not available

Maternal Education

Data not available

Other Characteristics

Data not available

This study included participants from the following locations:

  • State not reported or international
International Locations
Ireland
Study Participants

Study participants were pregnant women recruited in a maternity hospital or in the community. A total of 233 pregnant women were randomly assigned to either the Preparing for Life—Home Visiting group that received home visiting services (“high PFL”; 115 participants) or the comparison condition that did not receive home visiting services (“low PFL”; 118 participants). The study included a total of 207 participants, 105 in the high PFL group and 102 in the low PFL comparison group. Outcomes were measured when the children in the sample were 12, 18, 24, and 36 months old. At intake, the average age of the mothers was 25. The percentage of mothers identifying as Irish was 96 percent, and 4 percent identified as Irish Traveller. About half of the women were first-time mothers.

Setting

The study took place in North Dublin, Ireland.

Intervention condition
Comparison Conditions

Participants in the low PFL (comparison) group did not have access to the home visiting services or tip sheets. The comparison group did, however, receive some of the same resources made available to the high PFL (intervention) group, including the package of safety items and toys. These participants had access to an information officer who met with participants before the child’s birth and at various intervals after birth and provided information on Preparing for Life community events and other local services. Participants in the comparison group had access to public health workshops, such as a stress-control program and a healthy food program.

Subgroups examined

There were no subgroups reported in this manuscript.

Author Affiliation

Dr. Doyle and the Preparing for Life Evaluation team are affiliated with the University College Dublin Geary Institute for Public Policy. The authors were contracted by the home visiting model developers to evaluate Preparing for Life—Home Visiting.

Funding Sources

The Atlantic Philanthropies and the Department of Children and Youth Affairs (Ireland) supported the research.