Manuscript Details

Source

Baker, A. J. L., Piotrkowski, C. S., & Brooks-Gunn, J. (2003). Program effectiveness and parent involvement in HIPPY (Study 1, NY sample, cohort 2). In M. Westheimer (Ed.), Parents making a difference: International research on the Home Instruction for Parents of Preschool Youngsters (HIPPY) program (Chapter 8).The Hebrew University Magnes Press.

Rating
Moderate
Author Affiliation

Not specified.

Funding Sources

Not specified.

Study Design

Design Attrition Baseline equivalence Confounding factors Valid, reliable measures?
Randomized controlled trial High Established on race/ethnicity and SES; outcomes not feasible to assess at baseline None
Notes

This book chapter examines four distinct samples, each of which HomVEE reviewed and reported separately as follows: Study 1: New York sample, Cohort 1; Study 1: New York sample, Cohort 2; Study 2: Arkansas sample, Cohort 1; and Study 2: Arkansas sample, Cohort 2. The sample reported here (New York sample, Cohort 2) is also reported in Baker & Piotrkowski (1996). Three findings assessed at program completion are reported in both manuscripts and included in HomVEE's report for Baker & Piotrkowski (1996): Metropolitan Readiness Test – Math, Metropolitan Readiness Test – Reading, and Cooperative Preschool Inventory. One finding assessed one year after program completion is also reported in both and included with HomVEE's report for Baker & Piotrkowski (1996): Child Classroom Adaptation Index.

Study Participants

Participants were recruited from families with students enrolled in pre-kindergarten at the agency providing HIPPY. Interested families were randomly assigned to intervention (n = 70) and comparison groups (n = 87). Study participants in the intervention group were mostly African American and Latino; 32 percent of intervention families were African American, 32 percent were Latino, and 13 percent were White. In the comparison group, 20 percent of families were African American, 29 percent were Latino, and 30 percent were White. More families reported public assistance benefits as their main source of income in the intervention group (34 percent) than in the comparison group (20 percent). At baseline, the children's average age was 55 months.

Setting

A large city in New York

Home Visiting Services

Families enrolled in HIPPY received home visits to deliver the HIPPY program. All families (intervention and comparison) participated in a full-day preschool program during the first year and in kindergarten in the second year that HIPPY was provided to families in the intervention group. All study participants were enrolled in a pre-kindergarten program offered by a public early childhood center.

Comparison Conditions

All families (intervention and comparison) participated in a full-day preschool program during the first year and in kindergarten in the second year that HIPPY was provided to families in the intervention group. All study participants were enrolled in a pre-kindergarten program offered by a public early childhood center.

Were any subgroups examined?
No

Findings that rate moderate or high in this manuscript

Child development and school readiness
Outcome measure Timing of follow-up Rating Effect size Stastical significance Sample size Sample description

Classroom adaptation measured using the Child Classroom Adaptation Index (CCAI)

Program completion

Moderate 0.22

Not statistically significant, p= 0.32

113 children

New York sample - Cohort 2

Standardized reading measured using the Metropolitan Readiness Test 5th Edition

One year after program completion

Moderate 0.07

Not statistically significant, p= 0.78

113 children

New York sample - Cohort 2

Standardized math measured using the Metropolitan Readiness Test 5th Edition

One year after program completion

Moderate 0.10

Not statistically significant, p= 0.70

113 children

New York sample - Cohort 2

Effect rating key
Favorable finding / Statistically significant
UnFavorable finding / Statistically significant
Ambiguous finding / Statistically significant
No effect / Not statistically significant

This study included participants with the following characteristics at enrollment:

Race/Ethnicity

The race and ethnicity categories may sum to more than 100 percent if Hispanic ethnicity was reported separately or respondents could select two or more race or ethnicity categories.

Black or African American
24.99%
Hispanic or Latino
30.25%
White
26.26%
Unknown
18.09%

Maternal Education

Less than a high school diploma
22.16%
High school diploma or GED
33.75%
Unknown
44.09%

Other Characteristics

Enrollment in means-tested programs
25.82%