Manuscript Details

Kitzman, H., Olds, D. L., Knudtson, M. D., Cole, R., Anson, E., Smith, J. A., Fishbein, D., DiClemente, R., Wingood, G., Caliendo, A. M., Hopfer, C., Miller, T., & Conti, G. (2019). Prenatal and/or infancy nurse home visiting and 18-year outcomes of a randomized trial. Pediatrics, 144(6). https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2018-3876

Peer Reviewed

High rating
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2
Study design characteristics contributing to rating
Design Attrition Baseline equivalence Confounding factors? Valid, reliable measures?
Randomized controlled trial Low

Not assessed for randomized controlled trials with low attrition

No

Yes

Notes from the review of this manuscript

Findings on mother’s partnership status and costs for public benefits were ineligible for review because they are not in one of HomVEE's eligible outcome domains. Findings for mother’s Social Security Administration earnings when children were 12 months to 16 years of age were not eligible for review because findings at each follow-up time were not available for review, as required by HomVEE standards. Findings for maternal substance abuse received an indeterminate rating because HomVEE could not confirm the reliability of the measure. Information on sample sizes, reliability and validity of measures, and means and standard deviations for the impact estimates is based on correspondence with the authors.

Child Development and School Readiness
Outcome Measure Timing of Follow-Up Rating Direction of Effect Effect Size (Absolute Value) Stastical Significance Sample Size Sample Description
Achenbach System of Empirically Based Assessment (ASEBA), Externalizing Behavior Problems (borderline or clinical threshold) 12 years High
0.09 Not statistically significant, p = 0.50 574 children NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2014, full sample
Achenbach System of Empirically Based Assessment (ASEBA), Externalizing Behavior Problems (borderline or clinical threshold) 18 years High
0.07 Not statistically significant, p= 0.72 611 children NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2014, full sample
Achenbach System of Empirically Based Assessment (ASEBA), Internalizing Behavior Problems (borderline or clinical threshold) 6 years High
0.08 Not statistically significant, p = 0.62 618 children NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2014, full sample
Achenbach System of Empirically Based Assessment (ASEBA), Internalizing Behavior Problems (borderline or clinical threshold) 12 years High
0.21 Not statistically significant, p = 0.09 577 children NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2014, full sample
Achenbach System of Empirically Based Assessment (ASEBA), Internalizing Behavior Problems (borderline or clinical threshold) 18 years High
0.05 Not statistically significant, p= 0.73 625 children NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2014, full sample
Achenbach System of Empirically Based Assessment (ASEBA), Total Behavior Problems (borderline or clinical threshold) 6 years High
0.48 Not statistically significant, p = 0.11 616 children NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2014, full sample
Achenbach System of Empirically Based Assessment (ASEBA), Total Behavior Problems (borderline or clinical threshold) 12 years High
0.13 Not statistically significant, p = 0.31 575 children NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2014, full sample
Achenbach System of Empirically Based Assessment (ASEBA), Total Behavior Problems (borderline or clinical threshold) 18 years High
0.28 Not statistically significant, p= 0.22 611 children NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2014, full sample
Achenbach System of Empirically Based Assessment (ASEBA) Externalizing Behavior Problems, borderline or clinical threshold 6 years High
0.09 Not statistically significant, p = 0.51 620 children NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2014, full sample
Current drug use in the past month or positive lab test result 18 years High
0.06 Not statistically significant, p= 0.55 613 children NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2014, full sample
Facial Emotion Recognition Task, Emotion recognition 18 years High
0.14 Not statistically significant, p= 0.08 617 children NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2014, full sample
Graduated from high school 18 years High
0.12 Not statistically significant, p= 0.35 619 children NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2014, full sample
Graduated with honors 18 years High
0.46 Statistically significant, p= 0.03 619 children NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2014, full sample
HIV risk 18 years High
0.08 Not statistically significant, p= 0.38 604 children NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2014, full sample
Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test III (PPVT-III), Receptive language 6 years High
0.09 Not statistically significant, p = 0.31 612 children NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2014, full sample
Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test III (PPVT-III), Receptive language 18 years High
0.05 Not statistically significant, p= 0.55 621 children NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2014, full sample
Subgroups
Outcome Measure Timing of Follow-Up Rating Direction of Effect Effect Size (Absolute Value) Stastical Significance Sample Size Sample Description
Any positive STI laboratory test result 18 years High
0.03 Not statistically significant, p= 0.89 286 children NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2014; Subgroup: Child gender (boys)
Any positive STI laboratory test result 18 years High
0.09 Not statistically significant, p= 0.60 319 children NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2014; Subgroup: Child gender (girls)
Facial Emotion Recognition Task, Emotion recognition 18 years High
0.22 Statistically significant, p= 0.04 329 children NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2014; Subgroup: Mother has psychological vulnerability
Graduated from high school 18 years High
0.04 Not statistically significant, p= 0.83 333 children NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2014; Subgroup: Mother has psychological vulnerability
Graduated with honors 18 years High
0.73 Statistically significant, p= 0.02 333 children NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2014; Subgroup: Mother has psychological vulnerability
Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test III (PPVT-III), Receptive language 6 years High
0.13 Not statistically significant, p = 0.28 323 children NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2014; Subgroup: Mother has psychological vulnerability
Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test III (PPVT-III), Receptive language 18 years High
0.24 Statistically significant, p= 0.05 331 children NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2014; Subgroup: Mother has psychological vulnerability
Time to first live birth 18 years High
1.20 Not statistically significant, p= 0.62 305 children NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2014; Subgroup: Child gender (boys)
Time to first live birth 18 years High
0.80 Not statistically significant, p= 0.44 324 children NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2014; Subgroup: Child gender (girls)
Time to first pregnancy 18 years High
0.86 Not statistically significant, p= 0.57 305 children NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2014; Subgroup: Child gender (boys)
Time to first pregnancy 18 years High
0.85 Not statistically significant, p= 0.46 324 children NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2014; Subgroup: Child gender (girls)
Effect rating key
Favorable finding / Statistically significant
Unfavorable finding / Statistically significant
Ambiguous finding / Statistically significant
No effect / Not statistically significant
Family Economic Self-Sufficiency
Outcome Measure Timing of Follow-Up Rating Direction of Effect Effect Size (Absolute Value) Stastical Significance Sample Size Sample Description
Supplemental Security Income, disability enrollment 18 years High
0.33 Not statistically significant, p= 0.19 619 children NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2014, full sample
Subgroups
Outcome Measure Timing of Follow-Up Rating Direction of Effect Effect Size (Absolute Value) Stastical Significance Sample Size Sample Description
Supplemental Security Income, disability enrollment 18 years High
0.67 Statistically significant, p= 0.01 330 children NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2014; Subgroup: Mother has psychological vulnerability
Effect rating key
Favorable finding / Statistically significant
Unfavorable finding / Statistically significant
Ambiguous finding / Statistically significant
No effect / Not statistically significant
Reductions in Juvenile Delinquency, Family Violence, and Crime
Outcome Measure Timing of Follow-Up Rating Direction of Effect Effect Size (Absolute Value) Stastical Significance Sample Size Sample Description
Ever in a gang 18 years High
0.18 Not statistically significant, p= 0.27 625 children NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2014, full sample
Number of arrests 18 years High
1.02 Not statistically significant, p= 0.93 629 children NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2014, full sample
Number of convictions 18 years High
0.86 Not statistically significant, p= 0.59 629 children NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2014, full sample
Number of interpersonal violence arrests 18 years High
1.39 Not statistically significant, p= 0.32 629 children NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2014, full sample
Number of interpersonal violence convictions 18 years High
1.33 Not statistically significant, p= 0.43 629 children NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2014, full sample
Subgroups
Outcome Measure Timing of Follow-Up Rating Direction of Effect Effect Size (Absolute Value) Stastical Significance Sample Size Sample Description
Number of arrests 18 years High
0.84 Not statistically significant, p= 0.65 324 children NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2014; Subgroup: Mother has psychological vulnerability
Number of convictions 18 years High
0.47 Not statistically significant, p= 0.08 324 children NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2014; Subgroup: Mother has psychological vulnerability
Number of interpersonal violence arrests 18 years High
1.48 Not statistically significant, p= 0.42 324 children NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2014; Subgroup: Child gender (girls)
Number of interpersonal violence convictions 18 years High
0.81 Not statistically significant, p= 0.69 324 children NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2014; Subgroup: Child gender (girls)
Effect rating key
Favorable finding / Statistically significant
Unfavorable finding / Statistically significant
Ambiguous finding / Statistically significant
No effect / Not statistically significant

This study included participants with the following characteristics at enrollment:

Race/Ethnicity

The race and ethnicity categories may sum to more than 100 percent if Hispanic ethnicity was reported separately or respondents could select two or more race or ethnicity categories.

Black or African American
93%
Unknown
7%

Maternal Education

Data not available

Other Characteristics

Data not available

This study included participants from the following locations:

  • Tennessee
Study Participants

Participants were recruited from an obstetric and pediatric care clinic in Memphis, Tennessee. To be eligible, participants had to be pregnant (< 29 weeks’ gestation), have no previous live births, and have at least two sociodemographic risk factors (unmarried, no high school diploma, or unemployed). They were randomly assigned to either the Nurse-Family Partnership intervention (228 participants) or the comparison condition (514 participants). Six hundred and eighteen mothers were included in the analyses in this manuscript (192 in the intervention group and 426 in the comparison group). Participants were in the study from the time of enrollment at pregnancy until the child was 24 months old. Selected outcomes collected from administrative records were obtained every year from baseline until the 18-year follow-up. All other outcomes were measured at the 18-year follow-up. In the study, 92 percent of the participants were African American; at enrollment, 98 percent were unmarried, 64 percent were younger than 18 years of age, and 85 percent were from households with incomes below the federal poverty guidelines.

Setting

The study took place in Memphis, Tennessee.

Intervention condition
Comparison Conditions

Participants assigned to the comparison condition were not eligible to receive home visits through Nurse-Family Partnership. They received free transportation for scheduled prenatal care. The children in the study received developmental screening and referral at ages 6, 12, and 24 months.

Subgroups examined

• Mother has psychological vulnerability (yes or no) • Child gender (boy or girl)

Author Affiliation

The study authors are affiliated with the University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, University of Rochester, Curtin University, and University College London. David Olds, one of the authors of the manuscript, is a developer of the Nurse-Family Partnership home visiting model.

Funding Sources

This research was supported by Award Number R01DA021624 from the National Institutes of Health.