Manuscript Details

Source

Peer reviewed?
Yes

Olds, D. L., Kitzman, H., Anson, E., Smith, J. A., Knudtson, M. D., Miller, T., Cole, R., Hopfer, C., & Conti, G. (2019). Prenatal and infancy nurse home visiting effects on mothers: 18-year follow-up of a randomized trial. Pediatrics, 144(6), 12. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2018-3889

High rating
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2

Note: Navigate to model page for more information about the home visiting model. See the study manuscript for more information about how the model was implemented in this study.

Author Affiliation

The study authors are affiliated with the University of Rochester, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Pennsylvania State University, New York University, Columbia University, Brown University, Curtin University, and University College London. David Olds, one of the authors of the manuscript, is a developer of the Nurse-Family Partnership home visiting model.

Funding Sources

This research was supported by Award Number R01DA021624 from the National Institutes of Health.

Study Design

Design Attrition Baseline equivalence Confounding factors Valid, reliable measures?
Randomized controlled trial Low

Not assessed for randomized controlled trials with low attrition

No

Yes

Notes

Findings for math achievement measured at ages 6, 12, and 18 received a low rating because they did not meet the HomVEE reliability standards. Findings for nonverbal intelligence measured at ages 6 and 18, sustained attention measured at ages 12 and 18, working memory measured at age 18, risky decision making measured at age 18, and time to substance use disorder measured at age 18 received an indeterminate rating because HomVEE could not confirm the reliability of the measures. Information on sample sizes, reliability and validity of measures, and proportions for the impact estimates is based on correspondence with the authors.

Study Participants

Participants were recruited from an obstetric and pediatric care clinic in Memphis, Tennessee. To be eligible, the participants had to be pregnant (< 29 weeks’ gestation), have no previous live births, and have at least two sociodemographic risk factors (unmarried, no high school diploma, or unemployed). They were randomized to either the Nurse-Family Partnership intervention (228 participants) or the comparison condition (514 participants). Children born to the participants who were randomized were included in the analyses in this manuscript (194 youth born to mothers in the intervention group and 435 youth born to mothers in the comparison group). Participants were in the study from the time of enrollment during pregnancy until the focal child was 24 months old. Outcomes were measured when youth were ages 6, 12, and 18. In the study, 92 percent of the participants were African American; at enrollment, 98 percent were unmarried, 64 percent were younger than 18 years of age, and 85 percent were from households with incomes below the federal poverty guideline.

Setting

The study took place in Memphis, Tennessee.

Home Visiting Services

As described in this manuscript, the Nurse-Family Partnership intervention consisted of prenatal and infancy home visits until the focal child was 24 months old. Participants also received free transportation for scheduled prenatal care. Children received developmental screening and referral at ages 6, 12, and 24 months. All participants received four weekly home visits at the beginning of the intervention to establish a relationship with the nurse. The initial visits focused on mothers’ aspirations, concerns about their prenatal health, the developing fetus, birth, and the challenges of caring for a newborn. To address individual needs revealed in the visits, nurses used their clinical judgment to adjust the dosage and content of the visit, and used telephone communications when in-person visits were not possible. Nurses completed an average of seven home visits during pregnancy and 26 visits during the first two years postpartum. All visits took place in the families’ homes.

Note: Navigate to model page for more information about the home visiting model. See the study manuscript for more information about how the model was implemented in this study.

Comparison Conditions

Participants assigned to the comparison condition were not eligible to receive home visits through Nurse-Family Partnership. They received free transportation for scheduled prenatal care. The children in the study received developmental screening and referral at ages 6, 12, and 24 months.

Were any subgroups examined?
No
Subgroups examined

• Mother has high psychological resources (yes or no)

Findings that rate moderate or high in this manuscript

Maternal health
Outcome measure Timing of follow-up Rating Direction of Effect Effect size (absolute value) Stastical significance Sample size Sample description

Beck Depression Screening Inventory, Maternal depression, clinical or borderline threshold

18 years

High
0.07

Not statistically significant, p= 0.72

617 mothers

NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2015, full sample

Mothers' subsequent births

1 year

High
0.30

Statistically significant, p = 0.00

694 mothers

NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2015, full sample

Mothers' subsequent births

2 years

High
0.25

Statistically significant, p = 0.00

686 mothers

NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2015, full sample

Mothers' subsequent births

3 years

High
0.25

Statistically significant, p = 0.00

681 mothers

NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2015, full sample

Mothers' subsequent births

4 years

High
0.24

Statistically significant, p = 0.00

681 mothers

NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2015, full sample

Mothers' subsequent births

5 years

High
0.22

Statistically significant, p = 0.01

670 mothers

NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2015, full sample

Mothers' subsequent births

6 years

High
0.17

Statistically significant, p < 0.05

668 mothers

NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2015, full sample

Mothers' subsequent births

7 years

High
0.15

Not statistically significant, p = 0.08

660 mothers

NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2015, full sample

Mothers' subsequent births

8 years

High
0.12

Not statistically significant, p = 0.17

658 mothers

NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2015, full sample

Mothers' subsequent births

9 years

High
0.08

Not statistically significant, p = 0.32

658 mothers

NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2015, full sample

Mothers' subsequent births

10 years

High
0.05

Not statistically significant, p = 0.58

645 mothers

NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2015, full sample

Mothers' subsequent births

11 years

High
0.05

Not statistically significant, p = 0.54

643 mothers

NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2015, full sample

Mothers' subsequent births

12 years

High
0.04

Not statistically significant, p = 0.62

643 mothers

NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2015, full sample

Mothers' subsequent births

13 years

High
0.04

Not statistically significant, p = 0.64

629 mothers

NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2015, full sample

Mothers' subsequent births

14 years

High
0.04

Not statistically significant, p = 0.65

618 mothers

NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2015, full sample

Mothers' subsequent births

15 years

High
0.04

Not statistically significant, p = 0.66

618 mothers

NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2015, full sample

Mothers' subsequent births

16 years

High
0.04

Not statistically significant, p = 0.67

618 mothers

NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2015, full sample

Mothers' subsequent births

17 years

High
0.05

Not statistically significant, p = 0.57

618 mothers

NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2015, full sample

Mothers' subsequent births

18 years

High
0.05

Not statistically significant, p = 0.54

574 mothers

NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2015, full sample

Drug Use Screening Inventory (DUSI), current substance use

18 years

High
0.08

Not statistically significant, p= 0.49

617 mothers

NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2015, full sample

Beck Anxiety Screening Inventory, clinical or borderline threshold

18 years

High
0.04

Not statistically significant, p= 0.82

617 mothers

NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2015, full sample

Pearlin Mastery Scale

36th week of pregnancy

High
0.14

Not statistically significant, p = 0.09

657 mothers

NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2015, full sample

Pearlin Mastery Scale

6 months

High
0.07

Not statistically significant, p = 0.44

666 mothers

NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2015, full sample

Pearlin Mastery Scale

2 years

High
0.19

Statistically significant, p = 0.03

670 mothers

NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2015, full sample

Pearlin Mastery Scale

6 years

High
0.04

Not statistically significant, p = 0.65

635 mothers

NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2015, full sample

Pearlin Mastery Scale

9 years

High
0.05

Not statistically significant, p = 0.53

625 mothers

NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2015, full sample

Pearlin Mastery Scale

12 years

High
0.09

Not statistically significant, p = 0.32

582 mothers

NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2015, full sample

Pearlin Mastery Scale

18 years

High
1.98

Not statistically significant, p= 0.19

616 mothers

NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2015, full sample

Effect rating key
Favorable finding / Statistically significant
Unfavorable finding / Statistically significant
Ambiguous finding / Statistically significant
No effect / Not statistically significant
Family economic self-sufficiency
Outcome measure Timing of follow-up Rating Direction of Effect Effect size (absolute value) Stastical significance Sample size Sample description

Months mother's current spouse employed

18 years

High
0.22

Statistically significant, p= 0.01

604 mothers

NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2015, full sample

Months mother worked per year

2 years

High
0.06

Not statistically significant, p = 0.46

641 mothers

NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2015, full sample

Months mother worked per year

4.5 years

High
0.11

Not statistically significant, p = 0.19

646 mothers

NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2015, full sample

Months mother worked per year

6 years

High
0.01

Not statistically significant, p = 0.89

649 mothers

NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2015, full sample

Months mother worked per year

9 years

High
0.14

Not statistically significant, p = 0.11

640 mothers

NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2015, full sample

Months mother worked per year

12 years

High
0.14

Not statistically significant, p = 0.11

642 mothers

NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2015, full sample

Months mother worked per year

18 years

High
0.07

Not statistically significant, p = 0.43

618 mothers

NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2015, full sample

Supplemental NutritionAssistance Program (SNAP) - Number of months using the service/benefit

1 year

High
0.01

Not statistically significant, p = 0.88

643 mothers

NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2015, full sample

Supplemental NutritionAssistance Program (SNAP) - Number of months using the service/benefit

2 years

High
0.12

Not statistically significant, p = 0.16

643 mothers

NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2015, full sample

Supplemental NutritionAssistance Program (SNAP) - Number of months using the service/benefit

3 years

High
0.03

Not statistically significant, p = 0.69

643 mothers

NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2015, full sample

Supplemental NutritionAssistance Program (SNAP) - Number of months using the service/benefit

4 years

High
0.17

Statistically significant, p < 0.05

643 mothers

NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2015, full sample

Supplemental NutritionAssistance Program (SNAP) - Number of months using the service/benefit

5 years

High
0.19

Statistically significant, p = 0.03

619 mothers

NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2015, full sample

Supplemental NutritionAssistance Program (SNAP) - Number of months using the service/benefit

6 years

High
0.16

Not statistically significant, p = 0.07

641 mothers

NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2015, full sample

Supplemental NutritionAssistance Program (SNAP) - Number of months using the service/benefit

7 years

High
0.13

Not statistically significant, p = 0.13

636 mothers

NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2015, full sample

Supplemental NutritionAssistance Program (SNAP) - Number of months using the service/benefit

8 years

High
0.12

Not statistically significant, p = 0.15

636 mothers

NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2015, full sample

Supplemental NutritionAssistance Program (SNAP) - Number of months using the service/benefit

9 years

High
0.10

Not statistically significant, p = 0.25

636 mothers

NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2015, full sample

Supplemental NutritionAssistance Program (SNAP) - Number of months using the service/benefit

10 years

High
0.21

Statistically significant, p = 0.01

636 mothers

NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2015, full sample

Supplemental NutritionAssistance Program (SNAP) - Number of months using the service/benefit

11 years

High
0.19

Statistically significant, p = 0.03

636 mothers

NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2015, full sample

Supplemental NutritionAssistance Program (SNAP) - Number of months using the service/benefit

12 years

High
0.06

Not statistically significant, p = 0.48

636 mothers

NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2015, full sample

Supplemental NutritionAssistance Program (SNAP) - Number of months using the service/benefit

13 years

High
0.07

Not statistically significant, p = 0.43

636 mothers

NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2015, full sample

Supplemental NutritionAssistance Program (SNAP) - Number of months using the service/benefit

14 years

High
0.04

Not statistically significant, p = 0.61

636 mothers

NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2015, full sample

Supplemental NutritionAssistance Program (SNAP) - Number of months using the service/benefit

15 years

High
0.05

Not statistically significant, p = 0.55

636 mothers

NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2015, full sample

Supplemental NutritionAssistance Program (SNAP) - Number of months using the service/benefit

16 years

High
0.01

Not statistically significant, p = 0.94

629 mothers

NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2015, full sample

Supplemental NutritionAssistance Program (SNAP) - Number of months using the service/benefit

17 years

High
0.03

Not statistically significant, p = 0.71

606 mothers

NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2015, full sample

Supplemental NutritionAssistance Program (SNAP) - Number of months using the service/benefit

18 years

High
0.04

Not statistically significant, p = 0.67

601 mothers

NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2015, full sample

AFDC and TANF - Number of months using the service/benefit

1 year

High
0.09

Not statistically significant, p = 0.28

667 mothers

NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2015, full sample

AFDC and TANF - Number of months using the service/benefit

2 years

High
0.16

Not statistically significant, p = 0.06

667 mothers

NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2015, full sample

AFDC and TANF - Number of months using the service/benefit

3 years

High
0.08

Not statistically significant, p = 0.35

667 mothers

NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2015, full sample

AFDC and TANF - Number of months using the service/benefit

4 years

High
0.27

Statistically significant, p = 0.00

667 mothers

NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2015, full sample

AFDC and TANF - Number of months using the service/benefit

5 years

High
0.03

Not statistically significant, p = 0.71

622 mothers

NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2015, full sample

AFDC and TANF - Number of months using the service/benefit

6 years

High
0.09

Not statistically significant, p = 0.31

641 mothers

NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2015, full sample

AFDC and TANF - Number of months using the service/benefit

7 years

High
0.05

Not statistically significant, p = 0.60

636 mothers

NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2015, full sample

AFDC and TANF - Number of months using the service/benefit

8 years

High
0.02

Not statistically significant, p = 0.84

636 mothers

NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2015, full sample

AFDC and TANF - Number of months using the service/benefit

9 years

High
0.02

Not statistically significant, p = 0.86

636 mothers

NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2015, full sample

AFDC and TANF - Number of months using the service/benefit

10 years

High
0.07

Not statistically significant, p = 0.38

636 mothers

NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2015, full sample

AFDC and TANF - Number of months using the service/benefit

11 years

High
0.05

Not statistically significant, p = 0.55

636 mothers

NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2015, full sample

AFDC and TANF - Number of months using the service/benefit

12 years

High
0.05

Not statistically significant, p = 0.54

636 mothers

NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2015, full sample

AFDC and TANF - Number of months using the service/benefit

13 years

High
0.05

Not statistically significant, p = 0.59

636 mothers

NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2015, full sample

AFDC and TANF - Number of months using the service/benefit

14 years

High
0.01

Not statistically significant, p = 0.95

636 mothers

NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2015, full sample

AFDC and TANF - Number of months using the service/benefit

15 years

High
0.16

Not statistically significant, p = 0.07

636 mothers

NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2015, full sample

AFDC and TANF - Number of months using the service/benefit

16 years

High
0.07

Not statistically significant, p = 0.40

629 mothers

NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2015, full sample

AFDC and TANF - Number of months using the service/benefit

17 years

High
0.05

Not statistically significant, p = 0.53

606 mothers

NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2015, full sample

AFDC and TANF - Number of months using the service/benefit

18 years

High
0.01

Not statistically significant, p = 0.87

601 mothers

NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2015, full sample

Medicaid - Number of months using the service/benefit

1 year

High
0.12

Not statistically significant, p = 0.15

643 mothers

NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2015, full sample

Medicaid - Number of months using the service/benefit

2 years

High
0.11

Not statistically significant, p = 0.21

643 mothers

NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2015, full sample

Medicaid - Number of months using the service/benefit

3 years

High
0.05

Not statistically significant, p = 0.53

643 mothers

NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2015, full sample

Medicaid - Number of months using the service/benefit

4 years

High
0.18

Statistically significant, p = 0.04

643 mothers

NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2015, full sample

Medicaid - Number of months using the service/benefit

5 years

High
0.22

Statistically significant, p = 0.01

619 mothers

NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2015, full sample

Medicaid - Number of months using the service/benefit

6 years

High
0.12

Not statistically significant, p = 0.14

641 mothers

NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2015, full sample

Medicaid - Number of months using the service/benefit

7 years

High
0.06

Not statistically significant, p = 0.50

634 mothers

NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2015, full sample

Medicaid - Number of months using the service/benefit

8 years

High
0.05

Not statistically significant, p = 0.56

634 mothers

NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2015, full sample

Medicaid - Number of months using the service/benefit

9 years

High
0.02

Not statistically significant, p = 0.80

634 mothers

NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2015, full sample

Medicaid - Number of months using the service/benefit

10 years

High
0.10

Not statistically significant, p = 0.26

634 mothers

NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2015, full sample

Medicaid - Number of months using the service/benefit

11 years

High
0.14

Not statistically significant, p = 0.10

634 mothers

NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2015, full sample

Medicaid - Number of months using the service/benefit

12 years

High
0.01

Not statistically significant, p = 0.88

634 mothers

NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2015, full sample

Medicaid - Number of months using the service/benefit

13 years

High
0.04

Not statistically significant, p = 0.64

634 mothers

NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2015, full sample

Medicaid - Number of months using the service/benefit

14 years

High
0.03

Not statistically significant, p = 0.72

634 mothers

NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2015, full sample

Medicaid - Number of months using the service/benefit

15 years

High
0.07

Not statistically significant, p = 0.43

628 mothers

NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2015, full sample

Medicaid - Number of months using the service/benefit

16 years

High
0.06

Not statistically significant, p = 0.52

608 mothers

NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2015, full sample

Medicaid - Number of months using the service/benefit

17 years

High
0.02

Not statistically significant, p = 0.83

603 mothers

NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2015, full sample

Medicaid - Number of months using the service/benefit

18 years

High
0.08

Not statistically significant, p = 0.34

603 mothers

NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2015, full sample

Effect rating key
Favorable finding / Statistically significant
Unfavorable finding / Statistically significant
Ambiguous finding / Statistically significant
No effect / Not statistically significant