Manuscript Details

Source

Hanks, Carole, Luckey, Dennis, Knudtson, Michael, Kitzman, Harriet, Anson, Elizabeth, Arcoleo, Kimberly, & Olds, David. (2011) Neighborhood context and the Nurse-Family Partnership. Unpublished report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice. (Denver results from Study 3.)

Moderate rating
Author Affiliation

David L. Olds, a study author, is a developer of this model.

Funding Sources

Not specified.

Study Design

Design Attrition Baseline equivalence Confounding factors Valid, reliable measures?
Randomized controlled trial Low Not established on race/ethnicity or SES None
Notes

HomVEE originally reported findings from three locations described in this manuscript (Denver, Elmira, and Memphis) together under one citation. To align with the new study definition in the HomVEE Handbook of Procedures and Evidence Standards: Version 2, in 2021 HomVEE created new manuscript pages to report findings separately for each location.

Because baseline equivalence is not established on race/ethnicity and SES, we cannot determine if there were significant differences for which authors should have controlled in analyses. Thus the highest rating possible for the study is moderate.

Study Participants

Since 1977, the authors have conducted three randomized controlled trials of NFP in trials in Elmira, New York, with a sample of primarily white families in a semi-rural community (N = 400); Memphis, Tennessee, with a sample of primarily African American families (N = 743); and Denver, Colorado, with a sample that is largely Hispanic (46 percent; N = 735). The Denver trial included a treatment arm in which NFP was delivered by paraprofessionals rather than nurses, but this study focuses on nurse-visited women. For this study, the authors obtained U.S. Bureau of Census tract and block group numbers for the addresses of participants in the Elmira, Memphis, and Denver NFP trials. The authors created a neighborhood disadvantage index in order to answer three research questions: (1) Did nurse-visited families move to less disadvantaged neighborhoods over time compared with their control-group counterparts? (2) If nurse-visited women moved to better neighborhoods, to what extent did their living in better neighborhoods account for their improvements in maternal and child health compared with control group women and children? (3) To what extent did the NFP program attenuate the risk for poor maternal and child health associated with concentrated neighborhood social disadvantage?

Setting

Denver, CO

Home Visiting Services

See descriptions for site-specific trials.

Comparison Conditions

See descriptions for site-specific trials.

Were any subgroups examined?
Yes
Subgroups examined

• Mother has psychological vulnerability

Study Participants

Since 1977, the authors have conducted three randomized controlled trials of NFP in trials in Elmira, New York, with a sample of primarily white families in a semi-rural community (N = 400); Memphis, Tennessee, with a sample of primarily African American families (N = 743); and Denver, Colorado, with a sample that is largely Hispanic (46 percent; N = 735). The Denver trial included a treatment arm in which NFP was delivered by paraprofessionals rather than nurses, but this study focuses on nurse-visited women. For this study, the authors obtained U.S. Bureau of Census tract and block group numbers for the addresses of participants in the Elmira, Memphis, and Denver NFP trials. The authors created a neighborhood disadvantage index in order to answer three research questions: (1) Did nurse-visited families move to less disadvantaged neighborhoods over time compared with their control-group counterparts? (2) If nurse-visited women moved to better neighborhoods, to what extent did their living in better neighborhoods account for their improvements in maternal and child health compared with control group women and children? (3) To what extent did the NFP program attenuate the risk for poor maternal and child health associated with concentrated neighborhood social disadvantage?

Setting

Denver, CO

Home Visiting Services

See descriptions for site-specific trials.

Comparison Conditions

See descriptions for site-specific trials.

Were any subgroups examined?
Yes
Subgroups examined

• Mother has psychological vulnerability

Findings that rate moderate or high in this manuscript

Family economic self-sufficiency
Outcome measure Timing of follow-up Rating Direction of Effect Effect size (absolute value) Stastical significance Sample size Sample description
Neighborhood Disadvantage index 4 years Moderate
0.04 p = 0.72 414 mothers Denver, CO- Nurse Family Partnership (NFP)
Neighborhood Disadvantage index 6 years Moderate
0.12 p = 0.34 394 mothers Denver, CO- Nurse Family Partnership (NFP)
Neighborhood Disadvantage index 9 years Moderate
0.03 p = 0.84 357 mothers Denver, CO- Nurse Family Partnership (NFP)
Neighborhood Disadvantage index 4 years Moderate
0.23 p = 0.16 152 mothers Denver, CO- Nurse Family Partnership (NFP); Subgroup: Mother has psychological vulnerability
Effect rating key
Favorable finding / Statistically significant
UnFavorable finding / Statistically significant
Ambiguous finding / Statistically significant
No effect / Not statistically significant