Black or African American
16%
Hanks, Carole, Luckey, Dennis, Knudtson, Michael, Kitzman, Harriet, Anson, Elizabeth, Arcoleo, Kimberly, & Olds, David. (2011) Neighborhood context and the Nurse-Family Partnership. Unpublished report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice. (Denver results from Study 3.)
Not specified.
Design | Attrition | Baseline equivalence | Confounding factors | Valid, reliable measures? |
---|---|---|---|---|
Randomized controlled trial | Low | Not established on race/ethnicity or SES | None |
HomVEE originally reported findings from three locations described in this manuscript (Denver, Elmira, and Memphis) together under one citation. To align with the new study definition in the HomVEE Handbook of Procedures and Evidence Standards: Version 2, in 2021 HomVEE created new manuscript pages to report findings separately for each location.
Because baseline equivalence is not established on race/ethnicity and SES, we cannot determine if there were significant differences for which authors should have controlled in analyses. Thus the highest rating possible for the study is moderate.
Since 1977, the authors have conducted three randomized controlled trials of NFP in trials in Elmira, New York, with a sample of primarily white families in a semi-rural community (N = 400); Memphis, Tennessee, with a sample of primarily African American families (N = 743); and Denver, Colorado, with a sample that is largely Hispanic (46 percent; N = 735). The Denver trial included a treatment arm in which NFP was delivered by paraprofessionals rather than nurses, but this study focuses on nurse-visited women. For this study, the authors obtained U.S. Bureau of Census tract and block group numbers for the addresses of participants in the Elmira, Memphis, and Denver NFP trials. The authors created a neighborhood disadvantage index in order to answer three research questions: (1) Did nurse-visited families move to less disadvantaged neighborhoods over time compared with their control-group counterparts? (2) If nurse-visited women moved to better neighborhoods, to what extent did their living in better neighborhoods account for their improvements in maternal and child health compared with control group women and children? (3) To what extent did the NFP program attenuate the risk for poor maternal and child health associated with concentrated neighborhood social disadvantage?
Denver, CO
See descriptions for site-specific trials.
See descriptions for site-specific trials.
• Mother has psychological vulnerability
Since 1977, the authors have conducted three randomized controlled trials of NFP in trials in Elmira, New York, with a sample of primarily white families in a semi-rural community (N = 400); Memphis, Tennessee, with a sample of primarily African American families (N = 743); and Denver, Colorado, with a sample that is largely Hispanic (46 percent; N = 735). The Denver trial included a treatment arm in which NFP was delivered by paraprofessionals rather than nurses, but this study focuses on nurse-visited women. For this study, the authors obtained U.S. Bureau of Census tract and block group numbers for the addresses of participants in the Elmira, Memphis, and Denver NFP trials. The authors created a neighborhood disadvantage index in order to answer three research questions: (1) Did nurse-visited families move to less disadvantaged neighborhoods over time compared with their control-group counterparts? (2) If nurse-visited women moved to better neighborhoods, to what extent did their living in better neighborhoods account for their improvements in maternal and child health compared with control group women and children? (3) To what extent did the NFP program attenuate the risk for poor maternal and child health associated with concentrated neighborhood social disadvantage?
Denver, CO
See descriptions for site-specific trials.
See descriptions for site-specific trials.
• Mother has psychological vulnerability
Outcome measure | Timing of follow-up | Rating | Direction of Effect | Effect size (absolute value) | Stastical significance | Sample size | Sample description | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Neighborhood Disadvantage index | 4 years | Moderate | 0.04 | p = 0.72 | 414 mothers | Denver, CO- Nurse Family Partnership (NFP) | ||
Neighborhood Disadvantage index | 6 years | Moderate | 0.12 | p = 0.34 | 394 mothers | Denver, CO- Nurse Family Partnership (NFP) | ||
Neighborhood Disadvantage index | 9 years | Moderate | 0.03 | p = 0.84 | 357 mothers | Denver, CO- Nurse Family Partnership (NFP) | ||
Neighborhood Disadvantage index | 4 years | Moderate | 0.23 | p = 0.16 | 152 mothers | Denver, CO- Nurse Family Partnership (NFP); Subgroup: Mother has psychological vulnerability |
This study included participants with the following characteristics at enrollment:
Race/Ethnicity
Maternal Education
Other Characteristics
This study included participants from the following locations: