Manuscript Details

Source

Peer reviewed?
Yes

Riggs, J. L., Rosenblum, K. L., Muzik, M., Jester, J., Freeman, S., Huth-Bocks, A., Waddell, R., Alfafara, E., Miller, A., Lawler, J., Erickson, N., Weatherston, D., Shah, P., Brophy-Herb, H., & Michigan Collaborative for Infant Mental Health Research. (2022). Infant mental health home visiting mitigates impact of maternal adverse childhood experiences on toddler language competence: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 43(4), e227–e236. https://doi.org/10.1097/DBP.0000000000001020

Rating
High
Author Affiliation

The study authors are affiliated with Michigan Medicine, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Eastern Michigan University, University of Minnesota, the Alliance for the Advancement of Infant Mental Health, and Michigan State University. Additional author contributions were provided by the Michigan Collaborative for Infant Mental Health Research. HomVEE is not aware of any relationship between the authors and the home visiting model developer or distributor.

Funding Sources

Not reported

Study Design

Design Attrition Baseline equivalence Confounding factors Valid, reliable measures?
Randomized controlled trial Low

Not assessed for randomized controlled trials with low attrition

No

Yes

Notes

Information on measure reliability and data collection timing is based on correspondence with the author. Some findings in the manuscript are ineligible for review, including moderating analyses based on parent adverse childhood experiences score.

Study Participants

Study participants were mother-child dyads who were recruited via community mental health organizations or provider referrals. Mothers were eligible if their child was younger than 24 months old and the mother reported at least two risk factors (economic disadvantage, depression, perceived parenting challenges, or high parent adverse childhood experience [ACE] scores). A total of 62 dyads were randomly assigned and participated in the study: 32 in the Infant Mental Health Home Visiting (IMH-HV) group, and 30 in the comparison group. Outcomes were assessed at 12 months after enrollment. Seventy-three percent of mothers identified as White, 37 percent as Black, 12 percent as Hispanic or Latino/a, and 18 percent as another race; participants could identify as more than one race or ethnicity. Twenty-eight percent of mothers reported family incomes lower than $20,000 per year at the time of enrollment. The mean age of participating mothers at enrollment was 32, and the mean age of children at enrollment was 10.8 months.

Setting

The study took place in Michigan, with participants recruited via the Michigan community mental health system or from provider referrals.

Home Visiting Services

Michigan Infant Mental Health Home Visiting (IMH-HV) is a home visiting model for mother–child dyads with children younger than age 2. IMH-HV focuses on enhancing responsive parenting, reducing the risk of child maltreatment, and improving children’s social-emotional development. All sessions took place in the families’ homes, and families were offered services for up to 12 months. The total number of visits was determined based on family needs. In this study, the median number of home visits received was 26.

Comparison Conditions

Participants assigned to the comparison group were not eligible to receive IMH-HV services, but they received a list of community resources. 

Were any subgroups examined?
No
Subgroups examined

There were no subgroups reported in this manuscript.

Findings that rate moderate or high in this manuscript

Child development and school readiness
Outcome measure Timing of follow-up Rating Direction of Effect Effect size Stastical significance Sample size Sample description

Preschool Language Scales, Fifth Edition (PLS-5) Screening Test

12 months after baseline

High
2.47

Not statistically significant, p= 0.11

62 children

IMH-HV vs. comparison, Michigan, 2017-2020, full sample

Effect rating key
Favorable finding / Statistically significant
UnFavorable finding / Statistically significant
Ambiguous finding / Statistically significant
No effect / Not statistically significant

This study included participants with the following characteristics at enrollment:

Race/Ethnicity

The race and ethnicity categories may sum to more than 100 percent if Hispanic ethnicity was reported separately or respondents could select two or more race or ethnicity categories.

American Indian or Alaska Native
6.80%
Black or African American
37.00%
Hispanic or Latino
12.30%
Middle Eastern or North African
5.50%
White
72.60%
Unknown
5.50%

Maternal Education

Data not available

Other Characteristics

Indigenous population
6.80%
Enrollment in means-tested programs
45.20%