Manuscript Details

Peer reviewed?
No

Lee, H., Crowne S., Estarziau M., Kranker K., Michalopoulos C., Warren A., Mijanovich T., Filene J. H., Duggan A., and Knox V. (2019). The Effects of Home Visiting on Prenatal Health, Birth Outcomes, and Health Care Use in the First Year of Life, Final Implementation and Impact Findings from the Mother and Infant Home Visiting Program Evaluation-Strong Start (OPRE Report, 2019-08). [Study 3-NFP contrast]. Washington, DC, Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. https://www.acf.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/documents/opre/mihope_stron…

High rating
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2
Author Affiliation

Authors are affiliated with MDRC and subcontractors James Bell Associates, Johns Hopkins University, Mathematica, and New York University. HomVEE is not aware of any relationship between the authors and the home visiting model developer or distributor.

Funding Sources

This research was supported by the Administration for Children and Families, funded by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services under a competitive award, Contract No. HHS-HHSP23320095644WC.

Study Design
Design Attrition Baseline equivalence Confounding factors Valid, reliable measures?
Randomized controlled trial Low

Not assessed for randomized controlled trials with low attrition

No

Yes

The Mother and Infant Home Visiting Program Evaluation-Strong Start included two evidence-based home visiting models; this review focuses on the Nurse-Family Partnership. Findings in the manuscript that were pooled across various home visiting models were ineligible for review because HomVEE only reviews findings that isolate the effects of a specific model. Information on sample sizes and additional information to help characterize the impact estimates, along with information necessary to demonstrate equivalence of the intervention and comparison groups, is based on correspondence with the authors.

Study Participants

The Mother and Infant Home Visiting Program Evaluation-Strong Start (MIHOPE-Strong Start) is a national evaluation of the Maternal, Infant, and Early Childhood Home Visiting (MIECHV) Program for families enrolled in Medicaid or the Children’s Health Insurance Program. MIHOPE-Strong Start study participants were recruited from local programs that primarily served Medicaid beneficiaries from 2012 to 2015. Participants were eligible for the MIHOPE-Strong Start evaluation if they were no more than 32 weeks pregnant, were age 15 or older, spoke English or Spanish proficiently, and met the relevant eligibility criteria for the local home visiting model. A total of 1,872 participants were recruited for the study through Nurse Family Partnership (NFP) programs and randomly assigned to either the NFP home visiting intervention group (1,003 participants) or the comparison condition (869 participants). Up to 1,404 participants recruited for the study through NFP programs were included in the analyses: 760 in NFP and 644 in the comparison group. Similarly, up to 1,854 children were included in the study: 994 in NFP and 860 in the comparison group. Outcomes were measured at childbirth and when children were 12 months old. For MIHOPE-Strong Start participants recruited through NFP programs, 29 percent of participants were of Mexican origin, 19 percent were another Hispanic ethnicity, 16 percent were White, 26 percent were Black, and 10 percent were another race. Thirty-three percent did not have a high school diploma at study entry. At enrollment, the average age of participants recruited through NFP programs was 21.

Setting

The study took place in 17 states: California, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Massachusetts, Michigan, Nevada, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee, Washington, and Wisconsin. The evaluation selected 29 local program affiliates that operated Nurse-Family Partnership and met program eligibility criteria.

Home Visiting Services

As described in this manuscript, the Nurse-Family Partnership (NFP) intervention consists of activities designed to help participants obtain prenatal care, improve their diets, reduce their use of harmful substances, provide responsible and competent care for their children, plan future pregnancies, continue their education, and find work. The content and delivery of NFP vary, with flexibility of the visit, content, and frequency based on families’ strengths, risks, and needs. Participants enroll in NFP when they are no more than 28 weeks pregnant. Eighty-seven percent of families assigned to the intervention group received at least one home visit. Families participated in home visits for an average of 11.6 months and received an average of 20 visits.

Comparison Conditions

Participants assigned to the comparison group were not eligible to receive Nurse-Family Partnership services. They received information about other appropriate services in their local community.

Were any subgroups examined?
No
Subgroups examined

There were no subgroups reported in this manuscript.

Findings that rate moderate or high in this manuscript

Maternal health
Outcome measure Timing of follow-up Rating Direction of Effect Effect size (absolute value) Stastical significance Sample size Sample description

Any smoking during third trimester (%)

Birth

High

Not statistically significant, p= 0.23

1404 mothers

NFP vs. Resource referral RCT (MIHOPE-Strong Start), 2012-2015, United States, full sample

Effect rating key
Favorable finding / Statistically significant
Unfavorable finding / Statistically significant
Ambiguous finding / Statistically significant
No effect / Not statistically significant
Child health
Outcome measure Timing of follow-up Rating Direction of Effect Effect size (absolute value) Stastical significance Sample size Sample description

Low birth weight (< 2,500 grams; %)

Birth

High

Not statistically significant, p= 0.87

1714 infants

NFP vs. Resource referral RCT (MIHOPE-Strong Start), 2012-2015, United States, full sample

Preterm birth (< 37 weeks; %)

Birth

High

Not statistically significant, p= 0.24

1715 infants

NFP vs. Resource referral RCT (MIHOPE-Strong Start), 2012-2015, United States, full sample

Admitted to neonatal intensive care unit (%)

Birth

High

Not statistically significant, p= 0.68

1854 infants

NFP vs. Resource referral RCT (MIHOPE-Strong Start), 2012-2015, United States, full sample

Any emergency department visits (%)

12 months old

High

Not statistically significant, p= 0.90

1854 infants

NFP vs. Resource referral RCT (MIHOPE-Strong Start), 2012-2015, United States, full sample

Any nonbirth hospitalizations (%)

12 months old

High

Not statistically significant, p= 0.52

1854 infants

NFP vs. Resource referral RCT (MIHOPE-Strong Start), 2012-2015, United States, full sample

Average number of well-child office visits

12 months old

High

Not statistically significant, p= 0.37

1854 infants

NFP vs. Resource referral RCT (MIHOPE-Strong Start), 2012-2015, United States, full sample

Effect rating key
Favorable finding / Statistically significant
Unfavorable finding / Statistically significant
Ambiguous finding / Statistically significant
No effect / Not statistically significant

This study included participants with the following characteristics at enrollment:

Race/Ethnicity

The race and ethnicity categories may sum to more than 100 percent if Hispanic ethnicity was reported separately or respondents could select two or more race or ethnicity categories.

Black or African American
26%
Hispanic or Latino
48%
White
16%
Unknown
10%

Maternal Education

Less than a high school diploma
33%
High school diploma or GED
38%
Unknown
29%

Other Characteristics

Enrollment in means-tested programs
100%