American Indian or Alaska Native
2%
Oxford, M. L., Hash, J.B., Lohr, M. J., Fleming, C. B., Dow-Smith, C., & Spieker, S. J. (2023). What works for whom? Mother’s psychological distress as a moderator of the effectiveness of a home visiting intervention. Infant Mental Health Journal, 44(3), 301-318. https://doi.org/10.1002/imhj.22050
Peer Reviewed
| Outcome Measure | Timing of Follow-Up | Rating | Direction of Effect | Effect Size (Absolute Value) | Statistical Significance | Sample Size | Sample Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Infant Toddler Social Emotional Assessment (ITSEA), Externalizing behavior | 12 months old | High | 0.26 | Statistically significant, p= 0.04 | 252 mother/child dyads | PFR vs. comparison, King County, Washington, 2015-2020, full sample |
| Outcome Measure | Timing of Follow-Up | Rating | Direction of Effect | Effect Size (Absolute Value) | Statistical Significance | Sample Size | Sample Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maternal Confidence Questionnaire (MCQ) | 12 months old | High | 0.06 | Not statistically significant, p= 0.53 | 252 mother/child dyads | PFR vs. comparison, King County, Washington, 2015-2020, full sample | |
| Nursing Child Assessment Teaching Scale (NCATS), Parenting sensitivity | 6 months old | High | 0.25 | Statistically significant, p= 0.05 | 252 mother/child dyads | PFR vs. comparison, King County, Washington, 2015-2020, full sample | |
| Raising a Baby Scale (RAB), Understanding of toddlers | 6 months old | High | 0.21 | Statistically significant, p= 0.03 | 252 mother/child dyads | PFR vs. comparison, King County, Washington, 2015-2020, full sample | |
| Raising a Baby Scale (RAB), Understanding of toddlers | 12 months old | High | 0.47 | Statistically significant, p= 0.00 | 252 mother/child dyads | PFR vs. comparison, King County, Washington, 2015-2020, full sample |
This study included participants from the following locations:
The study took place in King County, Washington, in the greater Seattle area.
Note: Navigate to the model page for more information about the home visiting model. See the source manuscript for more information about how the model was implemented in this study.
Mothers in the comparison group did not receive the home visiting intervention, Promoting First Relationships. Instead, they were mailed a packet of information in their preferred language with handouts on child development and parenting and a list of local resources. They also received two check-in phone calls during the study.
This research was supported by Award Number R01 HD052809 from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development of the National Institutes of Health.
| Design | Random assignment compromised? | Attrition | Baseline equivalence | Confounding factors? | Valid, reliable measures? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Randomized controlled trial | No | Low |
Not assessed for randomized controlled trials with low attrition |
No |
Yes |
The following findings received a low rating because the measures did not meet HomVEE’s reliability standards: the Nursing Child Assessment Teaching Scale at age 12 months and the Maternal Confidence Questionnaire at age 6 months. The internal consistency values reported for those measures were below HomVEE’s minimum threshold. Reliability information was drawn from Oxford et al. (2021). Sample size information was obtained through correspondence with one of the study authors.