Manuscript Details

Mersky, J. P., Janczewski, C. E., Plummer Lee, C., Gilbert, R. M., McAtee, C., & Yasin, T. (2021). Home visiting effects on breastfeeding and bedsharing in a low-income sample. [Study 2]. Health Education & Behavior, 48(4), 488–495. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198120964197.

Peer Reviewed

Moderate rating
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2
Study design characteristics contributing to rating
Design Attrition Baseline equivalence Confounding factors? Valid, reliable measures?
Non-experimental comparison group design Not applicable

Established on race/ethnicity and SES; outcome(s) not feasible to assess at baseline

No

Yes

Notes from the review of this manuscript

The manuscript describes two studies: a randomized controlled trial (RCT) and a non-experimental comparison group design (NED). This review addresses the findings of the NED. The review of the RCT is addressed under Mersky et al. (2021; Study 1). Information on the measures and sample sizes—including information that was needed to demonstrate equivalence of the intervention and comparison groups and to establish measure reliability—is based on correspondence with the author.

Child Health
Outcome Measure Timing of Follow-Up Rating Direction of Effect Effect Size (Absolute Value) Stastical Significance Sample Size Sample Description
Breastfeeding duration (weeks) 12 months postpartum Moderate
1.30 Not statistically significant, p= 0.11 154 mother/child dyads HFA vs. Quasi-experimental comparison group, Milwaukee, 2014-2017, full sample
Ever breastfed 12 months postpartum Moderate
0.60 Statistically significant, p= 0.04 154 mother/child dyads HFA vs. Quasi-experimental comparison group, Milwaukee, 2014-2017, full sample
Effect rating key
Favorable finding / Statistically significant
Unfavorable finding / Statistically significant
Ambiguous finding / Statistically significant
No effect / Not statistically significant
Positive Parenting Practices
Outcome Measure Timing of Follow-Up Rating Direction of Effect Effect Size (Absolute Value) Stastical Significance Sample Size Sample Description
Any bedsharing by 12 months 12 months postpartum Moderate
0.42 Statistically significant, p= 0.03 154 mother/child dyads HFA vs. Quasi-experimental comparison group, Milwaukee, 2014-2017, full sample
Effect rating key
Favorable finding / Statistically significant
Unfavorable finding / Statistically significant
Ambiguous finding / Statistically significant
No effect / Not statistically significant

This study included participants with the following characteristics at enrollment:

Race/Ethnicity

The race and ethnicity categories may sum to more than 100 percent if Hispanic ethnicity was reported separately or respondents could select two or more race or ethnicity categories.

American Indian or Alaska Native
1%
Black or African American
47%
Hispanic or Latino
41%
White
7%
Unknown
4%

Maternal Education

Data not available

Other Characteristics

Indigenous population
1%

This study included participants from the following locations:

  • Wisconsin
Study Participants

Study participants were pregnant women with low incomes who were referred to the Milwaukee, Wisconsin, health department for home visiting services between April 2014 and March 2017. They were eligible if they spoke English or Spanish and did not previously receive home visiting services. A total of 154 mother-child dyads had complete data and were included in the study: 69 in the Healthy Families America home visiting group, and 85 in the comparison group. Outcomes were measured at 14–60 days postpartum, six months postpartum, and 12 months postpartum. Forty percent of mothers were Hispanic, 47 percent were African American or Black, and 12 percent were another race. Twenty-three percent had completed postsecondary education at the time of study enrollment.

Setting

The study took place in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, and focused on women who were seeking services at a large, urban health department.

Intervention condition
Comparison Conditions

Participants in the comparison group received a referral to home visiting but elected not to enroll in home visiting through the health department.

Subgroups examined

There were no subgroups reported in this manuscript.

Author Affiliation

Authors are affiliated with the University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee and the University of Wisconsin–Madison. HomVEE is not aware of any relationship between the authors and the home visiting model developer or distributor.

Funding Sources

Not reported