Manuscript Details

Peer reviewed?
No

Knox, V., & Michalopoulos, C. (2023). Mother and Infant Home Visiting Program Evaluation (MIHOPE), United States, 2012-2019. MIHOPE Model Results Documentation [Study 2-HFA contrast]. Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research. https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR37848.v3.

High rating
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2
Author Affiliation

Authors are affiliated with MDRC and subcontractors James Bell Associates, Johns Hopkins University, Mathematica, the University of Georgia, and Columbia University. HomVEE is not aware of any relationship between the authors and the home visiting model developer or distributor.

Funding Sources

This research was supported by the Administration for Children and Families, funded by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services under a competitive award, Contract No. HHS-HHSP23320095644WC.

Study Design
Design Attrition Baseline equivalence Confounding factors Valid, reliable measures?
Randomized controlled trial Low

Not assessed for randomized controlled trials with low attrition

No

Yes

The Mother and Infant Home Visiting Program Evaluation (MIHOPE) included four evidence-based home visiting models. This review focuses on Healthy Families America (HFA) and the findings in Knox & Michalopoulos, 2023. HomVEE has reviewed additional analyses from the MIHOPE evaluation under Michalopoulos et al., 2019.
 

One finding in this set of analyses, on a measure of breastfeeding duration, received a moderate rating because the finding demonstrated high attrition but satisfied the baseline equivalence requirement. Findings on measures of maternal health status and depression; food insecurity; parental unsupportiveness, engagement, and discipline; awareness of health and safety hazards; child behavior; and physical abuse received a rating of indeterminate because HomVEE could not assess whether the measures were reliable according to HomVEE standards. One finding on a measure of any report of child maltreatment was deemed to be ineligible for review because HomVEE does not review unsubstantiated reports of child maltreatment. Information on sample sizes and reliability and validity of measures, along with information necessary to demonstrate equivalence of the intervention and comparison groups, is based on correspondence with the authors. 

Study Participants

The Mother and Infant Home Visiting Program Evaluation (MIHOPE) is a national evaluation of the Maternal, Infant, and Early Childhood Home Visiting (MIECHV) Program. MIHOPE study participants were recruited from 2012 to 2015. Participants were eligible for the MIHOPE evaluation if they were age 15 or older at enrollment, were pregnant or had children younger than six months old, spoke English or Spanish proficiently, and met the relevant eligibility criteria for the local home visiting model. A total of 1,458 participants were recruited for the study in Healthy Families America (HFA) programs and randomly assigned to either the HFA home visiting intervention group (725 participants) or the comparison condition (733 participants). Up to 1,407 participants recruited for the study through HFA programs were included in the analyses: 691 in HFA and 716 in the comparison group. Similarly, up to 1,375 children of these participants were included in the analyses: 683 in HFA and 692 in the comparison group. Outcomes were measured when children were 15 months old. For the MIHOPE participants recruited through HFA programs, 22 percent of women were of Mexican origin, 12 percent were another Hispanic ethnicity, 27 percent were White, 31 percent were Black, and 8 percent were another race. Forty-three percent had less than a high school diploma at study entry. At enrollment, the average age of participants recruited through HFA programs was 24.

Setting

The study took place in 12 states: California, Georgia, Illinois, Iowa, Kansas, Michigan, Nevada, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Washington, and Wisconsin. The evaluation selected 26 local program affiliates that operated Healthy Families America (HFA) and met program eligibility criteria.

Home Visiting Services

As described in this manuscript, Healthy Families America (HFA) consists of activities designed to assess family needs, educate and support parents, and refer families to community services. The content and delivery of HFA vary, but the intervention has historically focused on preventing child maltreatment and is typically geared toward families at risk of child maltreatment or with behavioral health issues. The manuscript does not provide additional information on the HFA programs in the study, including the intensity or length of services offered to participating families.

Comparison Conditions

Women assigned to the comparison group were not eligible to receive Healthy Families America (HFA) services. They received information about other appropriate services in their local community.

Were any subgroups examined?
No
Subgroups examined

There were no subgroups reported in this manuscript.

Findings that rate moderate or high in this manuscript

Family economic self-sufficiency
Outcome measure Timing of follow-up Rating Direction of Effect Effect size (absolute value) Stastical significance Sample size Sample description

Health insurance coverage for the mother

15 months old

High
0.18

Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05

1391 mothers

HFA vs. Resource referral RCT (MIHOPE), 2012-2015, United States, full sample

Received SNAP during the past month

15 months old

High
0.03

Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05

1097 children

HFA vs. Resource referral RCT (MIHOPE), 2012-2015, United States, full sample

Received disability insurance during the past month

15 months old

High
0.03

Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05

1098 children

HFA vs. Resource referral RCT (MIHOPE), 2012-2015, United States, full sample

Received TANF during the past month

15 months old

High
0.05

Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05

1096 children

HFA vs. Resource referral RCT (MIHOPE), 2012-2015, United States, full sample

Received WIC during the past month

15 months old

High
0.06

Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05

1100 children

HFA vs. Resource referral RCT (MIHOPE), 2012-2015, United States, full sample

Received any transportation services

15 months old

High
0.10

Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05

1093 mothers

HFA vs. Resource referral RCT (MIHOPE), 2012-2015, United States, full sample

Effect rating key
Favorable finding / Statistically significant
Unfavorable finding / Statistically significant
Ambiguous finding / Statistically significant
No effect / Not statistically significant
Maternal health
Outcome measure Timing of follow-up Rating Direction of Effect Effect size (absolute value) Stastical significance Sample size Sample description

Current smoker

15 months old

High
0.04

Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05

1091 mothers

HFA vs. Resource referral RCT (MIHOPE), 2012-2015, United States, full sample

Substance use during the past three months

15 months old

High
0.03

Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05

1084 mothers

HFA vs. Resource referral RCT (MIHOPE), 2012-2015, United States, full sample

Received any behavioral health services

15 months old

High
0.03

Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05

1094 mothers

HFA vs. Resource referral RCT (MIHOPE), 2012-2015, United States, full sample

Parenting Stress Index - Short Form (PSI-SF), parental distress

15 months old

High

Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05

1108 mothers

HFA vs. Resource referral RCT (MIHOPE), 2012-2015, United States, full sample

Parenting Stress Index - Short Form (PSI-SF), parent-child dysfunctional interaction

15 months old

High

Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05

1106 mothers

HFA vs. Resource referral RCT (MIHOPE), 2012-2015, United States, full sample

Effect rating key
Favorable finding / Statistically significant
Unfavorable finding / Statistically significant
Ambiguous finding / Statistically significant
No effect / Not statistically significant
Child development and school readiness
Outcome measure Timing of follow-up Rating Direction of Effect Effect size (absolute value) Stastical significance Sample size Sample description

Use of nonparental child care

15 months old

High
0.04

Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05

1096 children

HFA vs. Resource referral RCT (MIHOPE), 2012-2015, United States, full sample

Brief Infant Toddler Social and Emotional Assessment (BITSEA), total competence score

15 months old

High

Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05

1124 children

HFA vs. Resource referral RCT (MIHOPE), 2012-2015, United States, full sample

Received any early intervention services (%)

15 months old

High
0.09

Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05

1101 mothers

HFA vs. Resource referral RCT (MIHOPE), 2012-2015, United States, full sample

Effect rating key
Favorable finding / Statistically significant
Unfavorable finding / Statistically significant
Ambiguous finding / Statistically significant
No effect / Not statistically significant
Reductions in juvenile delinquency, family violence, and crime
Outcome measure Timing of follow-up Rating Direction of Effect Effect size (absolute value) Stastical significance Sample size Sample description

Revised Conflict Tactics Scale (CTS2), maternal perpetration of physical violence

15 months old

High
0.13

Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05

1096 mothers

HFA vs. Resource referral RCT (MIHOPE), 2012-2015, United States, full sample

Revised Conflict Tactics Scale (CTS2), maternal experience with physical or sexual violence

15 months old

High
0.47

Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05

1095 mothers

HFA vs. Resource referral RCT (MIHOPE), 2012-2015, United States, full sample

Women's Experience with Battering (WEB) Scale

15 months old

High
0.48

Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05

1088 mothers

HFA vs. Resource referral RCT (MIHOPE), 2012-2015, United States, full sample

Received any domestic violence services

15 months old

High
0.26

Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05

1097 mothers

HFA vs. Resource referral RCT (MIHOPE), 2012-2015, United States, full sample

Received any services from a domestic violence shelter

15 months old

High
0.49

Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05

1096 mothers

HFA vs. Resource referral RCT (MIHOPE), 2012-2015, United States, full sample

Effect rating key
Favorable finding / Statistically significant
Unfavorable finding / Statistically significant
Ambiguous finding / Statistically significant
No effect / Not statistically significant
Reductions in child maltreatment
Outcome measure Timing of follow-up Rating Direction of Effect Effect size (absolute value) Stastical significance Sample size Sample description

Any substantiated maltreatment report

15 months old

High
0.19

Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05

1406 mothers

HFA vs. Resource referral RCT (MIHOPE), 2012-2015, United States, full sample

Loss of custody

15 months old

High
0.12

Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05

1407 mothers

HFA vs. Resource referral RCT (MIHOPE), 2012-2015, United States, full sample

Effect rating key
Favorable finding / Statistically significant
Unfavorable finding / Statistically significant
Ambiguous finding / Statistically significant
No effect / Not statistically significant
Child health
Outcome measure Timing of follow-up Rating Direction of Effect Effect size (absolute value) Stastical significance Sample size Sample description

Primary care provider for the child (%)

15 months old

High
0.02

Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05

1136 children

HFA vs. Resource referral RCT (MIHOPE), 2012-2015, United States, full sample

Number of Medicaid-paid immunizations

15 months old

High

Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05

1210 children

HFA vs. Resource referral RCT (MIHOPE), 2012-2015, United States, full sample

Any Medicaid-paid nonbirth hospitalizations

15 months old

High
0.03

Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05

1375 children

HFA vs. Resource referral RCT (MIHOPE), 2012-2015, United States, full sample

Underweight (%)

15 months old

High
0.16

Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05

908 children

HFA vs. Resource referral RCT (MIHOPE), 2012-2015, United States, full sample

Normal weight (%)

15 months old

High
0.06

Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05

908 children

HFA vs. Resource referral RCT (MIHOPE), 2012-2015, United States, full sample

At risk of being overweight (%)

15 months old

High
0.14

Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05

908 children

HFA vs. Resource referral RCT (MIHOPE), 2012-2015, United States, full sample

Duration of breastfeeding

15 months old

Moderate

Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05

579 children

HFA vs. Resource referral RCT (MIHOPE), 2012-2015, United States, full sample

Effect rating key
Favorable finding / Statistically significant
Unfavorable finding / Statistically significant
Ambiguous finding / Statistically significant
No effect / Not statistically significant

This study included participants with the following characteristics at enrollment:

Race/Ethnicity

The race and ethnicity categories may sum to more than 100 percent if Hispanic ethnicity was reported separately or respondents could select two or more race or ethnicity categories.

Black or African American
31%
Hispanic or Latino
34%
White
27%
Unknown
8%

Maternal Education

Less than a high school diploma
43%
High school diploma or GED
58%

Other Characteristics

Enrollment in means-tested programs
81%