Manuscript Details

Knox, V., & Michalopoulos, C. (2023). Mother and Infant Home Visiting Program Evaluation (MIHOPE), United States, 2012-2019. MIHOPE Model Results Documentation [Study 4-PAT contrast]. Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research. https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR37848.v3.

Study Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov
High rating
This manuscript received a rating of high because it is a randomized-controlled trial with low-attrition.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2.3
Child Development and School Readiness
Outcome Measure Timing of Follow-Up Rating Direction of Effect Effect Size (Absolute Value) Stastical Significance Sample Size Sample Description
Received any early intervention services (%) 15-month follow-up High
0.18 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 725 children PAT vs. Resource referral RCT (MIHOPE), 2012–2014, United States, full sample
Use of nonparental child care (%) 15-month follow-up High
0.12 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 718 children PAT vs. Resource referral RCT (MIHOPE), 2012–2014, United States, full sample
Effect rating key
Favorable finding / Statistically significant
Unfavorable finding / Statistically significant
Ambiguous finding / Statistically significant
No effect / Not statistically significant
Child Health
Outcome Measure Timing of Follow-Up Rating Direction of Effect Effect Size (Absolute Value) Stastical Significance Sample Size Sample Description
Any Medicaid-paid nonbirth hospitalizations (%) 15-month follow-up High
0.01 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 895 children PAT vs. Resource referral RCT (MIHOPE), 2012–2014, United States, full sample
At risk of being overweight (%) 15-month follow-up Moderate
0.30 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 617 children PAT vs. Resource referral RCT (MIHOPE), 2012–2014, United States, full sample
Normal weight (%) 15-month follow-up Moderate
0.24 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 617 children PAT vs. Resource referral RCT (MIHOPE), 2012–2014, United States, full sample
Number of Medicaid-paid immunizations 15-month follow-up High
Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 776 children PAT vs. Resource referral RCT (MIHOPE), 2012–2014, United States, full sample
Primary care provider for the child (%) 15-month follow-up High
0.22 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 752 children PAT vs. Resource referral RCT (MIHOPE), 2012–2014, United States, full sample
Underweight (%) 15-month follow-up Moderate
0.09 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 617 children PAT vs. Resource referral RCT (MIHOPE), 2012–2014, United States, full sample
Effect rating key
Favorable finding / Statistically significant
Unfavorable finding / Statistically significant
Ambiguous finding / Statistically significant
No effect / Not statistically significant
Family Economic Self-Sufficiency
Outcome Measure Timing of Follow-Up Rating Direction of Effect Effect Size (Absolute Value) Stastical Significance Sample Size Sample Description
Health insurance coverage for the mother (%) 15-month follow-up High
0.01 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 907 mothers PAT vs. Resource referral RCT (MIHOPE), 2012–2014, United States, full sample
Received any transportation services (%) 15-month follow-up High
0.03 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 721 mothers PAT vs. Resource referral RCT (MIHOPE), 2012–2014, United States, full sample
Received disability insurance during the past month (%) 15-month follow-up High
0.02 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 725 children PAT vs. Resource referral RCT (MIHOPE), 2012–2014, United States, full sample
Received Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) during the past month (%) 15-month follow-up High
0.08 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 724 children PAT vs. Resource referral RCT (MIHOPE), 2012–2014, United States, full sample
Received Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) during the past month (%) 15-month follow-up High
0.04 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 724 children PAT vs. Resource referral RCT (MIHOPE), 2012–2014, United States, full sample
Received Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) during the past month (%) 15-month follow-up High
0.01 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 722 children PAT vs. Resource referral RCT (MIHOPE), 2012–2014, United States, full sample
Effect rating key
Favorable finding / Statistically significant
Unfavorable finding / Statistically significant
Ambiguous finding / Statistically significant
No effect / Not statistically significant
Maternal Health
Outcome Measure Timing of Follow-Up Rating Direction of Effect Effect Size (Absolute Value) Stastical Significance Sample Size Sample Description
Current smoker (%) 15-month follow-up High
0.04 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 721 mothers PAT vs. Resource referral RCT (MIHOPE), 2012–2014, United States, full sample
Parenting Stress Index - Short Form (PSI-SF), parent-child dysfunctional interaction 15-month follow-up High
Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 724 mothers PAT vs. Resource referral RCT (MIHOPE), 2012–2014, United States, full sample
Parenting Stress Index - Short Form (PSI-SF), parental distress 15-month follow-up High
Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 724 mothers PAT vs. Resource referral RCT (MIHOPE), 2012–2014, United States, full sample
Received any behavioral health services (%) 15-month follow-up High
0.13 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 721 mothers PAT vs. Resource referral RCT (MIHOPE), 2012–2014, United States, full sample
Substance use during the past three months (%) 15-month follow-up High
0.04 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 716 mothers PAT vs. Resource referral RCT (MIHOPE), 2012–2014, United States, full sample
Effect rating key
Favorable finding / Statistically significant
Unfavorable finding / Statistically significant
Ambiguous finding / Statistically significant
No effect / Not statistically significant
Reductions In Child Maltreatment
Outcome Measure Timing of Follow-Up Rating Direction of Effect Effect Size (Absolute Value) Stastical Significance Sample Size Sample Description
Any substantiated maltreatment report (%) 15-month follow-up High
0.00 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 937 mothers PAT vs. Resource referral RCT (MIHOPE), 2012–2014, United States, full sample
Loss of custody (%) 15-month follow-up High
0.13 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 849 mothers PAT vs. Resource referral RCT (MIHOPE), 2012–2014, United States, full sample
Effect rating key
Favorable finding / Statistically significant
Unfavorable finding / Statistically significant
Ambiguous finding / Statistically significant
No effect / Not statistically significant
Reductions in Juvenile Delinquency, Family Violence, and Crime
Outcome Measure Timing of Follow-Up Rating Direction of Effect Effect Size (Absolute Value) Stastical Significance Sample Size Sample Description
Received any domestic violence services (%) 15-month follow-up High
0.12 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 720 mothers PAT vs. Resource referral RCT (MIHOPE), 2012–2014, United States, full sample
Received any services from a domestic violence shelter (%) 15-month follow-up High
0.00 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 721 mothers PAT vs. Resource referral RCT (MIHOPE), 2012–2014, United States, full sample
Revised Conflict Tactics Scale (CTS2), maternal experience with physical or sexual violence 15-month follow-up High
0.28 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 723 mothers PAT vs. Resource referral RCT (MIHOPE), 2012–2014, United States, full sample
Revised Conflict Tactics Scale (CTS2), maternal perpetration of physical violence 15-month follow-up High
0.06 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 723 mothers PAT vs. Resource referral RCT (MIHOPE), 2012–2014, United States, full sample
Effect rating key
Favorable finding / Statistically significant
Unfavorable finding / Statistically significant
Ambiguous finding / Statistically significant
No effect / Not statistically significant

This study included participants with the following characteristics at enrollment:

Race/Ethnicity

The race and ethnicity categories may sum to more than 100 percent if Hispanic ethnicity was reported separately or respondents could select two or more race or ethnicity categories.

Black or African American
28%
Hispanic or Latino
30%
White
34%
Unknown
8%

Maternal Education

Less than a high school diploma
45%
Unknown
56%

Other Characteristics

Enrollment in means-tested programs
67%

This study included participants from the following locations:

  • California
  • Georgia
  • Illinois
  • Iowa
  • Kansas
  • Michigan
  • Nevada
  • New Jersey
  • Pennsylvania
  • South Carolina
  • Washington
  • Wisconsin
Study Participants
  • Participants were eligible for the Mother and Infant Home Visiting Program Evaluation (MIHOPE) evaluation if they were age 15 or older at enrollment, were pregnant or had a young child, and spoke English or Spanish proficiently.
  • A total of 963 participants were recruited for the study in Parents as Teachers (PAT) programs and randomly assigned to either the Parents as Teachers home visiting intervention group (486 participants) or the comparison condition (477 participants).
  • Outcomes were measured when children were about 15 months old.
  • Just over one-third (34 percent) of the mothers recruited through Parents as Teachers programs were White, 30 percent were Hispanic or Latino, 28 percent were Black, and 8 percent were another race. Forty-five percent had less education than a high school diploma at study entry. Fifty-one percent were pregnant at the time of enrollment.
Setting

Researchers recruited families from 21 local Parents as Teachers programs in 12 U.S. states: California, Georgia, Illinois, Iowa, Kansas, Michigan, Nevada, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Washington, and Wisconsin. The programs mainly operated in metropolitan areas.

Intervention condition
Comparison Conditions

Women assigned to the comparison group were not eligible to receive Parents as Teachers services. They received information about other services in their local community.

Subgroups examined

None

Author Affiliation

Authors are affiliated with MDRC and subcontractors James Bell Associates, Johns Hopkins University, Mathematica, the University of Georgia, and Columbia University. HomVEE is not aware of any relationship between the authors and the home visiting model developer or distributor.

Funding Sources

This research was supported by the Administration for Children and Families, funded by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services under a competitive award, Contract No. HHS-HHSP23320095644WC.

Study design characteristics contributing to rating
Design Attrition Baseline equivalence Confounding factors? Valid, reliable measures?
Randomized controlled trial Low

Not assessed for randomized controlled trials with low attrition

No

Yes

Notes from the review of this manuscript

The Mother and Infant Home Visiting Program Evaluation (MIHOPE) was a national evaluation of the Maternal, Infant, and Early Childhood Home Visiting (MIECHV) Program. MIHOPE included four evidence-based home visiting models. This review focuses on Parents as Teachers (PAT) and the findings in Knox & Michalopoulos (2023). HomVEE has reviewed additional analyses from the MIHOPE evaluation under Michalopoulos et al. (2019) and McCombs-Thornton et al. (2023). Findings in the manuscript that are pooled across various home visiting models are ineligible for review because HomVEE only reviews findings that isolate the effects of a specific model. One finding on a measure of any report of child maltreatment was deemed ineligible for review because HomVEE does not review unsubstantiated reports of child maltreatment. Findings from the manuscript about depressive symptoms, health status, food insecurity, women’s experiences with domestic violence, parental intrusiveness, parental negative regard, parental detachment, parental physical abuse, awareness of health and safety hazards, and parental engagement receive a rating of indeterminate because HomVEE could not assess whether the measures were reliable according to HomVEE standards. Findings from the Brief Infant Toddler Social and Emotional Assessment receive a rating of low because the outcome measure does not meet HomVEE standards on reliability. The findings related to duration of breastfeeding receive a rating of low because they have high attrition and do not satisfy the baseline equivalence requirement. Information on sample sizes and reliability and validity of measures is based on correspondence with the authors.