Research Manuscript Database

Search for a study manuscript by keyword or select any filter to see results. For more information about how HomVEE reviews studies, see HomVEE's Methods and Standards Resources.

Filter By

Model

Manuscript Rating

Outcome domains examined

States in which the research was conducted

Manuscripts with subgroup findings

Populations served

Child age at the time of enrollment

Delivery Method

Intervention delivered in non-English language

Setting in which research was conducted

Search By

Displaying 81 - 90 of 551, sorted alphabetically Export list of citations

Carta, J. J., Lefever, J. B., Bigelow, K., Borkowski, J., & Warren, S. F. (2013). Randomized trial of a cellular-phone enhanced home visitation parenting intervention. [Study 1: SafeCare Parent-Child Interaction (PCI) module]. Pediatrics, 132(2), S167–S173. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2013-1021Q

Model(s) Reviewed: SafeCare Parent-Child Interaction (PCI) module

View Manuscript
Indeterminate rating
This manuscript received an indeterminate rating. That means HomVEE reviewers lacked sufficient information on one or more features of the study design required to receive a rating of moderate or high. A rating of indeterminate is not a statement about the quality of the research or the research design.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2.3

Carta, J. J., Lefever, J. B., Bigelow, K., Borkowski, J., & Warren, S. F. (2013). Randomized trial of a cellular-phone enhanced home visitation parenting intervention. [Study 2: Cellular Phone-Enhanced Version of SafeCare Parent-Child Interaction (PCI) module]. Pediatrics, 132(2), S167–S173. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2013-1021Q

Model(s) Reviewed: SafeCare Parent-Child Interaction (PCI) module

View Manuscript
Indeterminate rating
This manuscript received an indeterminate rating. That means HomVEE reviewers lacked sufficient information on one or more features of the study design required to receive a rating of moderate or high. A rating of indeterminate is not a statement about the quality of the research or the research design.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2.3

Casey, P.H., Irby, C., Withers, S., Dorsey, S., Li, J., & Rettiganti, M. (2017). Home visiting and the health of preterm infants. Clinical Pediatrics, 56(9), 828-837.

Model(s) Reviewed: Following Baby Back Home (FBBH)

View Manuscript
Low rating
This manuscript received a low rating because it is a non-experimental comparison group design study that does not satisfy the baseline equivalence requirement.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2

Casey, P., Rettiganti, M., & Gossett, J. (2017). Evaluation of UAMS/MIECHV Following Baby Back Home. Unpublished manuscript.

Model(s) Reviewed: Following Baby Back Home (FBBH)

View Manuscript
Low rating
This manuscript received a low rating because it is a non-experimental comparison group design study that does not satisfy the baseline equivalence requirement.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2

Casey, P., Rettiganti, M., & Gossett, J. (2017). Evaluation of UAMS/ANGELS Following Baby Back Home. Unpublished manuscript.

Model(s) Reviewed: Following Baby Back Home (FBBH)

View Manuscript
Low rating
This manuscript received a low rating because it is a non-experimental comparison group design study that does not satisfy the baseline equivalence requirement.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2

Cassibba, R., Castoro, G., Costantino, E., Sette, G., & Van IJzendoorn, M. H. (2015). Enhancing maternal sensitivity and infant attachment security with video feedback: An exploratory study in Italy. Infant Mental Health Journal, 36(1), 53–61.

Model(s) Reviewed: Video-Feedback Intervention to promote Positive Parenting (VIPP)

View Manuscript
Low rating
This manuscript received a low rating because it is a non-experimental comparison group design study that does not satisfy the baseline equivalence requirement.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2

Cates, K. K. (1995). Early intervention of at-risk children: Effects on academic performance (Publication No. 304169333) [Doctoral dissertation, University of Arkansas]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses.

Model(s) Reviewed: Home Instruction for Parents of Preschool Youngsters (HIPPY)®

View Manuscript
Low rating
This manuscript received a low rating because it is a non-experimental comparison group design study that does not satisfy the baseline equivalence requirement.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Chaiyachati, B. H., Gaither, J. R., Hughes, M., Foley-Schain, K., & Leventhal, J. M. (2018). Preventing child maltreatment: Examination of an established statewide home-visiting program. Child Abuse & Neglect, 79, 476-484.

Model(s) Reviewed: Parents as Teachers (PAT)®

View Manuscript
Low rating
This manuscript received a low rating because it is a non-experimental comparison group design study that does not satisfy the baseline equivalence requirement.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Chapman, D. J., Damio, G., Young, S., & Perez-Escamilla, R. (2004). Effectiveness of breastfeeding peer counseling in a low-income, predominantly Latina population: A randomized controlled trial. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 158(9), 897-902. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpedi.158.9.897

Model(s) Reviewed: Breastfeeding: Heritage and Pride™ (BHP)

View Manuscript
High rating
This manuscript received a rating of high because it is a randomized-controlled trial with low-attrition.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2

Chazan-Cohen, R., Raikes, H. H., & Vogel, C. (2013). V. Program subgroups: Patterns of impacts for home-based, center-based, and mixed-approach programs. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 78(1), 93-109.

Model(s) Reviewed: Early Head Start—Home-based option

View Manuscript
High rating
This manuscript received a rating of high because it is a randomized-controlled trial with low-attrition.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1
Download