Research Manuscript Database

Search for a study manuscript by keyword or select any filter to see results. For more information about how HomVEE reviews studies, see HomVEE's Methods and Standards Resources.

Filter By

Model

Manuscript Rating

Outcome domains examined

States in which the research was conducted

Manuscripts with subgroup findings

Populations served

Child age at the time of enrollment

Delivery Method

Intervention delivered in non-English language

Setting in which research was conducted

Search By

Displaying 131 - 140 of 228, sorted alphabetically Export list of citations

McEachern, A. D., Fosco, G. M., Dishion, T. J., Shaw, D. S., Wilson, M. N., & Gardner, F. (2013). Collateral benefits of the family check-up in early childhood: Primary caregivers’ social support and relationship satisfaction. Journal of Family Psychology, 27(2), 271.

Model(s) Reviewed: Family Check-Up® For Children

View Manuscript
Low rating
This manuscript received a low rating because it is a randomized-controlled trial with high-attrition that does not satisfy the baseline equivalence requirement.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

McFarlane, E., Crowne, S. S., Burrell, L., & Duggan, A. (2014). Home-visiting service delivery and outcomes for depressed mothers. Zero to Three, 34(5), 53–60.

Model(s) Reviewed: Family Check-Up® For Children

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Ineligible study design

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Meade, E., Dozier, M., & Bernard, K. (2014). Using video feedback as a tool in training parent coaches: Promising results from a single-subject design. Unpublished manuscript.

Model(s) Reviewed: Attachment and Biobehavioral Catch-Up–Infant (ABC-Infant)

View Manuscript
Not applicable (NA) - implementation study
Implementation research

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Meade, E., Dozier, M., Weston-Lee, P., & Haggerty, D. (2015). Community implementation outcomes of Attachment and Biobehavioral Catch-Up. Unpublished manuscript.

Model(s) Reviewed: Attachment and Biobehavioral Catch-Up–Infant (ABC-Infant)

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Ineligible study design

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Miller, K., Bourne, S., Dahl, C., Costello, C., Attinelly, J., Jennings, K., & Dozier, M. (2024). Using randomized controlled trials to ask questions regarding developmental psychopathology: A tribute to Dante Cicchetti. Development and Psychopathology, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579424000245 [Study 1: Randomized controlled trial].

Model(s) Reviewed: Attachment and Biobehavioral Catch-Up–Infant (ABC-Infant)

View Manuscript
Low rating
This manuscript received a low rating because it is a randomized-controlled trial with high-attrition that does not satisfy the baseline equivalence requirement.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2.3

Miller, K., Bourne, S., Dahl, C., Costello, C., Attinelly, J., Jennings, K., & Dozier, M. (2024). Using randomized controlled trials to ask questions regarding developmental psychopathology: A tribute to Dante Cicchetti. Development and Psychopathology, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579424000245 [Study 2: Non-experimental design].

Model(s) Reviewed: Attachment and Biobehavioral Catch-Up–Infant (ABC-Infant)

View Manuscript
Low rating
This manuscript received a low rating because the measures of effectiveness cannot be attributed solely to the intervention due to a confounding factor.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2.3

Moilanen, K. L., Shaw, D. S., Dishion, T. J., Gardner, F., & Wilson, M. (2010). Predictors of longitudinal growth in inhibitory control in early childhood. Social Development, 19(2), 326–347.

Model(s) Reviewed: Family Check-Up® For Children

View Manuscript
Moderate rating
This manuscript received a rating of moderate because it is a randomized-controlled trial with low-attrition that does not satisfy the baseline equivalence requirement.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Montaño, Z., Smith, J. D., Dishion, T. J., Shaw, D. S., & Wilson, M. N. (2015). Longitudinal relations between observed parenting behaviors and dietary quality of meals from ages 2 to 5. Appetite, 87, 324–329.

Model(s) Reviewed: Family Check-Up® For Children

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
No eligible outcomes

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Moore, K. J., Dishion, T. J., & Shaw, D. S. (2012). The “Family Check Up” in Early Childhood: A Public Health Intervention to Prevent Long-Term Behavioral and Emotional Disorders. CW360, 17.

Model(s) Reviewed: Family Check-Up® For Children

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
This citation is not a primary study

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Mucka, L. E. (2017). Schools and families empowering learning (safe–learning): An intervention feasibility study. [Doctoral dissertation, Wayne State University].

Model(s) Reviewed: Family Check-Up® For Children

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Ineligible study design

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2
Download