Research Manuscript Database

Search for a study manuscript by keyword or select any filter to see results. For more information about how HomVEE reviews studies, see HomVEE's Methods and Standards Resources.

Filter By

Model

Manuscript Rating

Outcome domains examined

States in which the research was conducted

Manuscripts with subgroup findings

Populations served

Child age at the time of enrollment

Delivery Method

Intervention delivered in non-English language

Setting in which research was conducted

Search By

Displaying 11 - 20 of 52, sorted alphabetically Export list of citations

BMC. (2019). Evaluation of the effectiveness of the ParentChild+ home visiting programme (ISRCTN96216897). https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN96216897

Model(s) Reviewed: ParentChild+® Family Home Visiting Model

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Ineligible study design
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2

Bracaliello, C., & Manz, P. (2011). The Parent Child Home Program’s impact on Latino caregiver’s enrollment and continued placement in early childhood preschool services: A brief report. Lehigh University. [Unpublished report].

Model(s) Reviewed: ParentChild+® Family Home Visiting Model

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Ineligible grey literature
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2

Bradshaw-McAnulty, G., & Delaney, L. (1979). An evaluation of the Mother-Child Home Program, ESEA, Title-I, for the Pittsfield Public School District. Pittsfield Public Schools. https://www.parentchildplus.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/ParentChild-…

Model(s) Reviewed: ParentChild+® Family Home Visiting Model

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Outside search years
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2

Bultinck, E., Falletta, K., Stoeppelwerth, P., Crowne, S., & Hegseth, D. (2022). Understanding the needs of ParentChild+ staff and families during the COVID-19 pandemic. Child Trends. https://doi.org/10.56417/3442g5692k

Model(s) Reviewed: ParentChild+® Family Home Visiting Model

View Manuscript
Not applicable (NA) - implementation study
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2

Casey, P.H., Irby, C., Withers, S., Dorsey, S., Li, J., & Rettiganti, M. (2017). Home visiting and the health of preterm infants. Clinical Pediatrics, 56(9), 828-837.

Model(s) Reviewed: Following Baby Back Home (FBBH)

View Manuscript
Low rating
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2

Casey, P., Rettiganti, M., & Gossett, J. (2017). Evaluation of UAMS/MIECHV Following Baby Back Home. Unpublished manuscript.

Model(s) Reviewed: Following Baby Back Home (FBBH)

View Manuscript
Low rating
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2

Casey, P., Rettiganti, M., & Gossett, J. (2017). Evaluation of UAMS/ANGELS Following Baby Back Home. Unpublished manuscript.

Model(s) Reviewed: Following Baby Back Home (FBBH)

View Manuscript
Low rating
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2

Casey, P., Rettiganti, M., & Li, J. (2016). Evaluation of UAMS/MIECHV Following Baby Back Home: 2012-2014. Unpublished manuscript.

Model(s) Reviewed: Following Baby Back Home (FBBH)

View Manuscript
Low rating
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2

Casey, P., Rettiganti, M., & Li, J. (2016). Evaluation of UAMS/ANGELS Following Baby Back Home: Deliverable G. Unpublished manuscript.

Model(s) Reviewed: Following Baby Back Home (FBBH)

View Manuscript
Not applicable (NA) - additional source
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Cullen, M. A., Cullen, S., & Bailey, T. (2020). Evaluation of pilot delivery of ParentChild+ in England, 2018-2020: Final report. University of Warwick, Centre for Educational Development, Appraisal and Research (CEDAR). https://www.familylives.org.uk/uploads/articles/final-report---cedar_pa…

Model(s) Reviewed: ParentChild+® Family Home Visiting Model

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Ineligible study design
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2
Download