Research Manuscript Database

Search for a study manuscript by keyword or select any filter to see results. For more information about how HomVEE reviews studies, see HomVEE's Methods and Standards Resources.

Filter By

Model

Manuscript Rating

Outcome domains examined

States in which the research was conducted

Manuscripts with subgroup findings

Populations served

Child age at the time of enrollment

Delivery Method

Intervention delivered in non-English language

Setting in which research was conducted

Search By

Displaying 1 - 10 of 24, sorted alphabetically Export list of citations

Arkansas Center for Health Improvement and UAMS Department of Family and Preventive Medicine. (2019). Home-visiting support for low-birth-weight preterm infants: evaluation findings from the Following Baby Back Home intervention. University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences. Little Rock, AR.

Model(s) Reviewed: Following Baby Back Home (FBBH)

View Manuscript
Low rating
This manuscript received a low rating because it is a non-experimental comparison group design study that does not satisfy the baseline equivalence requirement.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2

Brickhouse, T.H., Haldiman, R.R., & Evani, B. (2013). The impact of a home visiting program on children’s utilization of dental services. Pediatrics, 132(Suppl. 2) S147–S152. doi:10.1542/peds.2013-1021N 

Model(s) Reviewed: Virginia’s Comprehensive Health Investment Project (CHIP)

View Manuscript
Indeterminate rating
This manuscript received an indeterminate rating. That means HomVEE reviewers lacked sufficient information on one or more features of the study design required to receive a rating of moderate or high. A rating of indeterminate is not a statement about the quality of the research or the research design.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2.3

Casey, P.H., Irby, C., Withers, S., Dorsey, S., Li, J., & Rettiganti, M. (2017). Home visiting and the health of preterm infants. Clinical Pediatrics, 56(9), 828-837.

Model(s) Reviewed: Following Baby Back Home (FBBH)

View Manuscript
Low rating
This manuscript received a low rating because it is a non-experimental comparison group design study that does not satisfy the baseline equivalence requirement.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2

Casey, P., Rettiganti, M., & Gossett, J. (2017). Evaluation of UAMS/MIECHV Following Baby Back Home. Unpublished manuscript.

Model(s) Reviewed: Following Baby Back Home (FBBH)

View Manuscript
Low rating
This manuscript received a low rating because it is a non-experimental comparison group design study that does not satisfy the baseline equivalence requirement.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2

Casey, P., Rettiganti, M., & Gossett, J. (2017). Evaluation of UAMS/ANGELS Following Baby Back Home. Unpublished manuscript.

Model(s) Reviewed: Following Baby Back Home (FBBH)

View Manuscript
Low rating
This manuscript received a low rating because it is a non-experimental comparison group design study that does not satisfy the baseline equivalence requirement.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2

Casey, P., Rettiganti, M., & Li, J. (2016). Evaluation of UAMS/MIECHV Following Baby Back Home: 2012-2014. Unpublished manuscript.

Model(s) Reviewed: Following Baby Back Home (FBBH)

View Manuscript
Low rating
This manuscript received a low rating because it is a non-experimental comparison group design study that does not satisfy the baseline equivalence requirement.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2

Casey, P., Rettiganti, M., & Li, J. (2016). Evaluation of UAMS/ANGELS Following Baby Back Home: Deliverable G. Unpublished manuscript.

Model(s) Reviewed: Following Baby Back Home (FBBH)

View Manuscript
Not applicable (NA) - additional source
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Deater-Deckard, K., & Haldiman, R.R. (n.d.). Child Health Investment Partnership (CHIP) home-visiting asthma case management program: Preliminary results. Unpublished manuscript.

Model(s) Reviewed: Virginia’s Comprehensive Health Investment Project (CHIP)

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Ineligible study design

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2.3

Hodgetts, S., Savage, A., & McConnell, D. (2013). Experience and outcomes of Stepping Stones Triple P for families of children with autism. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 34(9), 2572-2585.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Home Visiting: Standard Stepping Stones

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Study does not examine a relevant target population. Ineligible study design

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Kleefman, M., Jansen, D. E., & Reinjneveld, S. A. (2011). The effectiveness of Stepping Stones Triple P: The design of a randomised controlled trial on a parenting programme regarding children with mild intellectual disability and psychosocial problems versus care as usual. BMC Public Health, 11(1), 676.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Home Visiting: Standard Stepping Stones

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Study is not the most recent and complete version available

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1
Download