Research Manuscript Database

Search for a study manuscript by keyword or select any filter to see results. For more information about how HomVEE reviews studies, see HomVEE's Methods and Standards Resources.

Filter By

Model

Manuscript Rating

Outcome domains examined

States in which the research was conducted

Manuscripts with subgroup findings

Populations served

Child age at the time of enrollment

Delivery Method

Intervention delivered in non-English language

Setting in which research was conducted

Search By

Displaying 341 - 347 of 347, sorted alphabetically Export list of citations

Young, E., & Kenkre, J. (2015). The impact of volunteering on volunteers: Home-Start’s volunteer impact management system [VIMS], London pilot study. Home-Start UK.

Model(s) Reviewed: Home-Start

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Does not examine a relevant target population
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2

Young, E., & Kenkre, J. (2016). New volunteerism in Scotland with Home-Start: Co-producing positive impacts for families, volunteers and local communities. Home-Start UK.

Model(s) Reviewed: Home-Start

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Does not examine a relevant target population
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2

Zemp, M., Milek, A., Cummings, E. M., & Bodenmann, G. (2017). Longitudinal interrelations between dyadic coping and coparenting conflict in couples. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 26(8), 2276–2290.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Home visiting is not a substantial element of the program
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Zemp, M., Milek, A., Cummings, E. M., Cina, A., & Bodenmann, G. (2016). How couple-and parenting-focused programs affect child behavioral problems: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 25(3), 798–810.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Home visiting is not a substantial element of the program
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Zemp, M., Milek, A., Davies, P. T., & Bodenmann, G. (2016). Improved child problem behavior enhances the parents’ relationship quality: A randomized trial. Journal of Family Psychology, 30(8), 896.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Home visiting is not a substantial element of the program
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Zhou, Y. Q., Chew, Q. R. C., Lee, M., Zhou, J., Chong, D., Quah, S. H., ... Tan, L. J. (2017). Evaluation of Positive Parenting Programme (Triple P) in Singapore: Improving parenting practices and preventing risks for recurrence of maltreatment. Children and Youth Services Review, 83, 274–284.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Home visiting is not a substantial element of the program
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Zimmermann, T. (2016). Kommunikation in der Familie [Family communication]. Monatsschrift Kinderheilkunde, 164(7), 565–573.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: This citation is not a primary study
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1
Download