Research Manuscript Database

Search for a study manuscript by keyword or select any filter to see results. For more information about how HomVEE reviews studies, see HomVEE's Methods and Standards Resources.

Filter By

Model

Manuscript Rating

Outcome domains examined

States in which the research was conducted

Manuscripts with subgroup findings

Populations served

Child age at the time of enrollment

Delivery Method

Intervention delivered in non-English language

Setting in which research was conducted

Search By

Displaying 21 - 30 of 49, sorted alphabetically Export list of citations

Harrison, M. (1984). The experience of home-start. Health Visitor, 57(6), 168.

Model(s) Reviewed: Home-Start

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
This citation is not a primary study

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Heinz, H., & Breidenbach, A. (2020). Connecting families with community supports: A study of best practices and barriers to community referrals in the first born home visiting program. Cradle to Career Policy Institute, University of New Mexico.

Model(s) Reviewed: First Born® Program

View Manuscript
Not applicable (NA) - implementation study
Implementation research

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2

Hermanns, J. M., Asscher, J. J., Zijlstra, B. J., Hoffenaar, P. J., & Dekovič, M. (2013). Long-term changes in parenting and child behavior after the Home-Start family support program. Children and Youth Services Review, 35(4), 678–684.

Model(s) Reviewed: Home-Start

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Ineligible study design

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2

Home is where we start from. (2021). Home-Start UK.

Model(s) Reviewed: Home-Start

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Ineligible study design

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2

Jones, C. C., Hayter, M., & Jomeen, J. (2015). A Home-Start peer support scheme for women with low mood following childbirth. Community Practitioner, 88(9), 41–44.

Model(s) Reviewed: Home-Start

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Ineligible study design

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2

Kenkre, J., & Young, E. (2014). Building resilience: Volunteer support for families with complex circumstances and needs. [Unpublished manuscript submitted to HomVEE].

Model(s) Reviewed: Home-Start

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Ineligible study design

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2

Kilburn, M. R., & Cannon, J. S. (2015). Home visiting start-up: Lessons learned from program replication in New Mexico. The Journal of Primary Prevention, 36, 275–279.

Model(s) Reviewed: First Born® Program

View Manuscript
Not applicable (NA) - implementation study
Implementation research

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2

Kilburn, R., & Cannon, J. S. (2016). Can home visiting promote parenting practices recommended by the American Academy of Pediatrics? A randomized clinical trial. [Unpublished manuscript submitted to HomVEE].

Model(s) Reviewed: First Born® Program

View Manuscript
Low rating
This manuscript received a low rating because it is a randomized-controlled trial with high-attrition that does not satisfy the baseline equivalence requirement.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2

Kilburn, R., & Cannon, J. S. (2016). The effect of a universal home visiting program on health care use in the first year of life: A randomized clinical trial. [Unpublished manuscript submitted to HomVEE].

Model(s) Reviewed: First Born® Program

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Manuscript is not the most recent and complete version available

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2

Kilburn, M. R., & Cannon, J. S. (2017). Home visiting and use of infant health care: A randomized clinical trial. Pediatrics, 139(1).

Model(s) Reviewed: First Born® Program

View Manuscript
Low rating
This manuscript received a low rating because it is a randomized-controlled trial with high-attrition that does not satisfy the baseline equivalence requirement.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2
Download