Research Manuscript Database

Search for a study manuscript by keyword or select any filter to see results. For more information about how HomVEE reviews studies, see HomVEE's Methods and Standards Resources.

Filter By

Model

Manuscript Rating

Outcome domains examined

States in which the research was conducted

Manuscripts with subgroup findings

Populations served

Child age at the time of enrollment

Delivery Method

Intervention delivered in non-English language

Setting in which research was conducted

Search By

Displaying 151 - 160 of 315, sorted alphabetically Export list of citations

Morawska, A., Sanders, M., Goadby, E., Headley, C., Hodge, L., McAuliffe, C., . . . Anderson, E. (2015). Erratum: “Is the Triple P-Positive Parenting Program acceptable to parents from culturally diverse backgrounds?” Journal of Child and Family Studies, 20(5), 614–622.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: This citation is not a primary study
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Morawska, A., Sanders, M., Goadby, E., Headley, C., Hodge, L., McAuliffe, C., . . . Anderson, E. (2015). Erratum: “Is the Triple P-Positive Parenting Program acceptable to parents from culturally diverse backgrounds?” Journal of Child and Family Studies, 20(5), 614–622.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: This citation is not a primary study
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Morawska, A., & Sanders, M. R. (May 2007). Are parent-reported outcomes for self-directed or telephone-assisted behavioral family intervention enhanced if parents are observed? Behavior Modification, 31(3), 279-297.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Home visiting is not a substantial element of the program
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Navaie-Waliser, M. (2000). An evaluation of the participants, impacts, and cost-effectiveness of the North Carolina Baby Love Maternal Outreach Worker program. (home visitation, care coordination, infants). Dissertation Abstracts International, 60(7-B), 3239.

Model(s) Reviewed: North Carolina Baby Love Maternal Outreach Workers Program

View Manuscript
Low rating
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Navaie-Waliser, M., Martin, S. L., Campbell, M. K., Tessaro, I., Kotelchuck, M., & Cross, A. W. (2000). Factors predicting completion of a home visitation program by high-risk pregnant women: The North Carolina Maternal Outreach Worker program. American Journal of Public Health, 90(1), 121-124.

Model(s) Reviewed: North Carolina Baby Love Maternal Outreach Workers Program

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: No eligible outcomes; Ineligible study design
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Navaie-Waliser, M., Martin, S. L., Tessaro, I., Campbell, M. K., & Cross, A. W. (2000). Social support and psychological functioning among high-risk mothers: The impact of the Baby Love Maternal Outreach Worker program. Public Health Nursing, 17(4), 280-291.

Model(s) Reviewed: North Carolina Baby Love Maternal Outreach Workers Program

View Manuscript
Low rating
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Nowak, C., & Heinrichs, N. (2008). A comprehensive meta-analysis of Triple P-Positive Parenting Program using hierarchical linear modeling: Effectiveness and moderating variables. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 11(3), 114-144.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Ineligible study design
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Nowak, C., & Heinrichs, N. (2008). A comprehensive meta-analysis of Triple P-Positive Parenting Program using hierarchical linear modeling: Effectiveness and moderating variables. Clinical Child & Family Psychology Review, 11(3), 114-144.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Ineligible study design
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Nowak, C., & Heinrichs, N. (2008). A comprehensive meta-analysis of Triple P-Positive Parenting Program using hierarchical linear modeling: Effectiveness and moderating variables. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 11(3), 114.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Ineligible study design
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Ozbek, A., Gencer, O., & Mustan, A. T. (2018). Which parents dropout from an evidence-based parenting programme (Triple-P) at CAMHS? Comparison of programme-completing and dropout parents. Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 1-14.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Ineligible study design
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1
Download