Research Manuscript Database

Search for a study manuscript by keyword or select any filter to see results. For more information about how HomVEE reviews studies, see HomVEE's Methods and Standards Resources.

Filter By

Model

Manuscript Rating

Outcome domains examined

States in which the research was conducted

Manuscripts with subgroup findings

Populations served

Child age at the time of enrollment

Delivery Method

Intervention delivered in non-English language

Setting in which research was conducted

Search By

Displaying 11 - 20 of 345, sorted alphabetically Export list of citations

Astuto, J., & Allen, L. (2018). Learning more about home visitation: RCT evaluation of the Parent Child+ Program for Black and Latino children living in poverty. Technical Report. (Study 1). p.l.ay.LabNYU, NYU Steinhardt. https://parentchildplus.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/study-1_astuto_allen_technical-report-2018_final-1.pdf

Model(s) Reviewed: ParentChild+® Family Home Visiting Model

View Manuscript
Indeterminate rating
This manuscript received an indeterminate rating. That means HomVEE reviewers lacked sufficient information on one or more features of the study design required to receive a rating of moderate or high. A rating of indeterminate is not a statement about the quality of the research or the research design.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2.2

Astuto, J., & Allen, L. (2018). Learning more about home visitation: RCT evaluation of the Parent Child+ Program for Latino Spanish speaking children of immigrants. Technical Report. (Study 2). https://parentchildplus.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/study-2-astuto-allen-technical-report-final2018.pdf

Model(s) Reviewed: ParentChild+® Family Home Visiting Model

View Manuscript
High rating
This manuscript received a rating of high because it is a randomized-controlled trial with low-attrition.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2.2

Atler, J. V. J. D., & Hill, P. M. S. (2001). Importance of investing in proven programs for children: A case study. Children's Legal Rights Journal, 21(2), 11-16.

Model(s) Reviewed: Nurse-Family Partnership (NFP)®

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
This citation is not a primary study

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Azzi-Lessing, L. (2011). Home visitation programs: Critical issues and future directions. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 26(4), 387-398. doi:10.1016/j.ecresq.2011.03.005

Model(s) Reviewed: Nurse-Family Partnership (NFP)®

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Ineligible study design

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Barnes, J. (2010). From evidence-base to practice: Implementation of the Nurse Family Partnership Programme in England. Journal of Children's Services, 5(4), 4–17.

Model(s) Reviewed: Nurse-Family Partnership (NFP)®

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Study does not examine a relevant target population

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Barnes, J., Ball, M., Meadows, P., Belsky, J., & FNP Implementation Research Team. (2009). Nurse-Family Partnership Programme—Second year pilot sites implementation in England: The infancy period. London, England: Department for Children, Schools and Families, Birkbeck, University of London.

Model(s) Reviewed: Nurse-Family Partnership (NFP)®

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Study does not examine a relevant target population

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Barnes, J., Ball, M., Meadows, P., Howden, B., Jackson, A., Henderson, J., & Niven, L. (2011). The Family-Nurse Partnership Programme in England: Wave 1 implementation in toddlerhood & a comparison between waves 1 and 2a of implementation in pregnancy and infancy. London, England: Institute for the Study of Children, Families, and Social Issues, Birkbeck, University of London.

Model(s) Reviewed: Nurse-Family Partnership (NFP)®

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Study does not examine a relevant target population

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Barnes, J., Ball, M., & Niven, L. (2011). Providing the Family-Nurse Partnership Programme through interpreters in England. Health & Social Care in the Community, 19(4), 382–391.

Model(s) Reviewed: Nurse-Family Partnership (NFP)®

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Study does not examine a relevant target population

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Barnes, J., Howden, B., Niven, L., & Ball, M. (2012). Eligibility for the Family Nurse Partnership Programme: Testing new criteria. London, England: Institute for the Study of Children, Families, and Social Issues, Birkbeck, University of London.

Model(s) Reviewed: Nurse-Family Partnership (NFP)®

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Study does not examine a relevant target population

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Bartik, T. J. (2008). The economic development effects of early childhood programs. W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research, Partnership for American’s Economic Success. https://research.upjohn.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1031&context=re…

Model(s) Reviewed: ParentChild+® Family Home Visiting Model

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
No eligible outcomes

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2.2
Download