Research Manuscript Database

Search for a study manuscript by keyword or select any filter to see results. For more information about how HomVEE reviews studies, see HomVEE's Methods and Standards Resources.

Filter By

Model

Manuscript Rating

Outcome domains examined

States in which the research was conducted

Manuscripts with subgroup findings

Populations served

Child age at the time of enrollment

Delivery Method

Intervention delivered in non-English language

Setting in which research was conducted

Search By

Displaying 461 - 470 of 612, sorted alphabetically Export list of citations

Salmon, K., Dittman, C., Sanders, M., Burson, R., & Hammington, J. (2015). Correction: “Triple P-Positive Parenting Program as a public health approach to strengthening parenting.” Journal of Family Psychology, 29(1), 244–252.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: This citation is not a primary study
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Salmon, K., Dittman, C., Sanders, M., Burson, R., & Hammington, J. (2015). Correction: “Triple P-Positive Parenting Program as a public health approach to strengthening parenting.” Journal of Family Psychology, 29(1), 244–252.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: This citation is not a primary study
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Salmon, K., Dittman, C., Sanders, M., Burson, R., & Hammington, J. (2015). Correction: "Does adding an emotion component enhance the Triple P−Positive Parenting Program.” Journal of Family Psychology, 29(1), 118.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: This citation is not a primary study
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Salmon, K., Dittman, C., Sanders, M., Burson, R., & Hammington, J. (2014). Does adding an emotion component enhance the Triple P− Positive Parenting Program? Journal of Family Psychology, 28(2), 244.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Home visiting is not a substantial element of the program
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Sampaio, F. (2016). Prevention and treatment of externalizing behaviour problems in children through parenting interventions: An application of health economic methods (Doctoral dissertation, Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis). Retrieved from http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:915262/FULLTEXT01.pdf

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Ineligible study design
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Sampaio, F., Barendregt, J. J., Feldman, I., Lee, Y. Y., Sawyer, M. G., Dadds, M. R., . . . Mihalopoulos, C. (2018). Population cost-effectiveness of the triple P parenting programme for the treatment of conduct disorder: An economic modelling study. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 27(7), 933–944.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: No eligible outcomes
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Sampaio, F., Barendregt, J. J., Feldman, I., Lee, Y. Y., Sawyer, M. G., Dadds, M. R., . . . Mihalopoulos, C. (2018). Population cost-effectiveness of the triple P parenting programme for the treatment of conduct disorder: An economic modelling study. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 27(7), 933–944.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Ineligible study design
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Sampaio, F., Sarkadi, A., Salari, R., Zethraeus, N., & Feldman, I. (2015). Cost and effects of a universal parenting programme delivered to parents of preschoolers. The European Journal of Public Health, 25(6), 1035–1042.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Home visiting is not a substantial element of the program
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Samples, F. L. (1995). The impact of a comprehensive early intervention program on social support among black and white adolescent mothers. Cornell University). Dissertation Abstracts International, 56 (07A), 144–2887.  (UMI No AAI9538807)

Model(s) Reviewed: Nurse-Family Partnership (NFP)®

View Manuscript
Low rating
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Samples, F. L. (1996). The differential impact of a comprehensive early intervention program on the level of support received by African-American and white adolescent mothers. Conference presentation.

Model(s) Reviewed: Nurse-Family Partnership (NFP)®

View Manuscript
Not applicable (NA) - additional source
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1
Download