Research Database

Search for a study manuscript by keyword or select any filter to see results. For more information about how HomVEE reviews studies, read about our Systematic Review Handbook of Procedures and Evidence Standards.

Filter By

Model

Manuscript Rating

Outcome domains examined

States in which the research was conducted

Manuscripts with subgroup findings

Populations served

Child age at the time of enrollment

Delivery Method

Intervention delivered in non-English language

Displaying 241 - 250 of 302
Ferguson, H., & Gates, P. (2015). Early intervention and holistic, relationship-based practice with fathers: Evidence from the work of the Family-Nurse Partnership. Child & Family Social Work, 20(1), 96–105.

Model(s) Reviewed: Nurse-Family Partnership (NFP)®

Rating: Does not pass screens
Ormston, R., & McConville, S. (2013). Evaluation of the Family Nurse Partnership Programme in NHS Lothian, Scotland: 4th report—Toddlerhood. Edinburgh, Scotland: ScotCen Social Research.

Model(s) Reviewed: Nurse-Family Partnership (NFP)®

Rating: Does not pass screens
Ormston, R., & McConville, S. (2012). Evaluation of the Family Nurse Partnership Programme in NHS Lothian, Scotland: 3rd report—Infancy. Edinburgh, Scotland: ScotCen Social Research.

Model(s) Reviewed: Nurse-Family Partnership (NFP)®

Rating: Does not pass screens
Ormston, R., McConville, S., & Gordon, J. (2012). Evaluation of the Family Nurse Partnership Programme in NHS Lothian, Scotland: 2nd report—Late pregnancy and postpartum. Edinburgh, Scotland: ScotCen Social Research; Glasgow, Scotland: Jacki Gordon & Associates.

Model(s) Reviewed: Nurse-Family Partnership (NFP)®

Rating: Does not pass screens
Martin, C., Marryat, L., Miller, M., Ormston, R., & Gordon, J. (2011). The evaluation of the Family Nurse Partnership Programme in Scotland: Phase 1 report—Intake and early pregnancy. Edinburgh, Scotland: ScotCen Social Research; Glasgow, Scotland: Jacki Gordon & Associates.

Model(s) Reviewed: Nurse-Family Partnership (NFP)®

Rating: Does not pass screens
Robinson, D., Miller, L., & Rickard, C. (2013). The family nurse workforce: A study for the Family Nurse Partnership national unit. Brighton, England: Institute for Employment Studies.

Model(s) Reviewed: Nurse-Family Partnership (NFP)®

Rating: Does not pass screens
Mackay, S., & Newman, J. (2012). A study into the local costs of the Family Nurse Partnership Programme in England, summary report. Watford, England: Apteligen.

Model(s) Reviewed: Nurse-Family Partnership (NFP)®

Rating: Does not pass screens
Barnes, J., Howden, B., Niven, L., & Ball, M. (2012). Eligibility for the Family Nurse Partnership Programme: Testing new criteria. London, England: Institute for the Study of Children, Families, and Social Issues, Birkbeck, University of London.

Model(s) Reviewed: Nurse-Family Partnership (NFP)®

Rating: Does not pass screens
Jack, S., M., Busser, L. D., Sheehan, D., Gonzalez, A., Zwygers, E. J., & MacMillan, H. L. (2012). Adaptation and implementation of the Nurse-Family Partnership in Canada. Canadian Journal of Public Health, 103(Suppl. 1), S42-S49.

Model(s) Reviewed: Nurse-Family Partnership (NFP)®

Rating: Does not pass screens
Ormston, R., McConville, S., & Gordon, J. (2014). Evaluation of the Family Nurse Partnership Programme in NHS Lothian, Scotland: Summary of key learning and implications. Edinburgh, Scotland: ScotCen Social Research; Glasgow, Scotland: Jacki Gordon & Associates.

Model(s) Reviewed: Nurse-Family Partnership (NFP)®

Rating: Does not pass screens