Research Manuscript Database

Search for a study manuscript by keyword or select any filter to see results. For more information about how HomVEE reviews studies, see HomVEE's Methods and Standards Resources.

Filter By

Model

Manuscript Rating

Outcome domains examined

States in which the research was conducted

Manuscripts with subgroup findings

Populations served

Child age at the time of enrollment

Delivery Method

Intervention delivered in non-English language

Setting in which research was conducted

Search By

Displaying 11 - 20 of 22, sorted alphabetically Export list of citations

Kilburn, M. R., & Cannon, J. S. (2015). Home visiting start-up: Lessons learned from program replication in New Mexico. The Journal of Primary Prevention, 36, 275–279.

Model(s) Reviewed: First Born® Program

View Manuscript
Not applicable (NA) - implementation study
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2

Kilburn, R., & Cannon, J. S. (2016). Can home visiting promote parenting practices recommended by the American Academy of Pediatrics? A randomized clinical trial. [Unpublished manuscript submitted to HomVEE].

Model(s) Reviewed: First Born® Program

View Manuscript
Low rating
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2

Kilburn, R., & Cannon, J. S. (2016). The effect of a universal home visiting program on health care use in the first year of life: A randomized clinical trial. [Unpublished manuscript submitted to HomVEE].

Model(s) Reviewed: First Born® Program

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Manuscript is not the most recent and complete version available
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2

Kilburn, M. R., & Cannon, J. S. (2017). Home visiting and use of infant health care: A randomized clinical trial. Pediatrics, 139(1).

Model(s) Reviewed: First Born® Program

View Manuscript
Low rating
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2

Kilburn, M. R., & Cannon, J. S. (2019). Home visiting for first-time parents. The Future of Children, 29(1), 81–98.

Model(s) Reviewed: First Born® Program

View Manuscript
Not applicable (NA) - implementation study
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2

Kilburn, M.R., & Estes, K. (2022). Summary: Virtual First Born Home Visiting During COVID. [Unpublished manuscript submitted to HomVEE].

Model(s) Reviewed: First Born® Program

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Not a manuscript
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2

Maher, E. J., Marcynyszyn, L. A., Corwin, T. W., & Hodnett, R. Dosage matters: The relationship between participation in the nurturing parenting program for infants, toddlers, and preschoolers and subsequent child maltreatment. Unpublished manuscript.

Model(s) Reviewed: Nurturing Parenting Programs (Birth to Age 5)

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Home visiting is not a substantial element of the program; Ineligible study design
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Martus, J. E. (1993). Benefits of a nurturing program: Perceptions of adolescent mothers. (San Jose State University; 6265 Advisor: Chair: Susan Murphy). Masters Abstracts International, 31 (04), 92-1744. (AAG1353038)

Model(s) Reviewed: Nurturing Parenting Programs (Birth to Age 5)

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Home visiting is not a substantial element of the program
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Matthew, R. F., Wang, M. Q., Bellamy, N., & Copeland, E. (2005). Test of efficacy of model family strengthening programs. American Journal of Health Studies, 20(3), 164–170.

Model(s) Reviewed: Nurturing Parenting Programs (Birth to Age 5)

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Ineligible study design
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Palusci, V. J., Crum, P., Bliss, R., & Bavolek, S. J. (2008). Changes in parenting attitudes and knowledge among inmates and other at-risk populations after a family nurturing program. Children & Youth Services Review, 30(1), 79–89.

Model(s) Reviewed: Nurturing Parenting Programs (Birth to Age 5)

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Ineligible study design
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1
Download