Research Manuscript Database

Search for a study manuscript by keyword or select any filter to see results. For more information about how HomVEE reviews studies, see HomVEE's Methods and Standards Resources.

Filter By

Model

Manuscript Rating

Outcome domains examined

States in which the research was conducted

Manuscripts with subgroup findings

Populations served

Child age at the time of enrollment

Delivery Method

Intervention delivered in non-English language

Setting in which research was conducted

Search By

Displaying 191 - 200 of 353, sorted alphabetically Export list of citations

ORS Impact. (2016). Long-term academic outcomes of participation in the Parent-Child Home Program (PCHP) in King County, WA. https://www.uwkc.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/Long-Term-Outcomes-PCHP-2-10-16.pdf

Model(s) Reviewed: ParentChild+® Family Home Visiting Model

View Manuscript
Indeterminate rating
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2

Organizational Research Services (2010). Evaluation of the Parent-Child Home Program/Play & Learn Group demonstration project 2005-2010: Final Report. Business Partnership for Early Learning. https://parentchildplus.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Evaluation-of-th…

Model(s) Reviewed: ParentChild+® Family Home Visiting Model

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Ineligible study design
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2

Ozbek, A., Gencer, O., & Mustan, A. T. (2018). Which parents dropout from an evidence-based parenting programme (Triple-P) at CAMHS? Comparison of programme-completing and dropout parents. Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 1-14.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Ineligible study design
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Özyurt, G., Dinsever, C., Caliskan, Z., & Evgin, D. (2018). Can positive parenting program (Triple P) be useful to prevent child maltreatment? Indian Journal of Psychiatry, 60(3), 286.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Study does not examine a relevant target population
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Özyurt, G., Dinsever, Ç., Çalişkan, Z., & Evgin, D. (2018). Effects of Triple P on Digital Technological Device Use in Preschool Children. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 27(1), 280–289.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Study does not examine a relevant target population
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Özyurt, G., Gencer, Ö., Öztürk, Y., & Özbek, A. (2016). Is triple P positive parenting program effective on anxious children and their parents? 4th month follow up results. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 25(5), 1646–1655.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Study does not examine a relevant target population
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Ozyurt, G., Gencer, O., Oztürk, Y., & Ozbek, A. (2014). P. 4. d. 003 Long term effectiveness of Triple P Positive Parenting Program on childhood anxiety disorders: A randomised controlled trial. European Neuropsychopharmacology, (24), S613.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Study does not examine a relevant target population
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Ozyurt, G., Gencer, O., Oztürk, Y., & Ozbek, A. (2014). P. 4. d. 003 Long term effectiveness of Triple P Positive Parenting Program on childhood anxiety disorders: A randomised controlled trial. European Neuropsychopharmacology, (24), S613.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Study does not examine a relevant target population
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Palmer, M. (2015). Low-intensity topic-specific group parenting programmes: Enhancing intervention outcomes (Doctoral dissertation, University of Glasgow) Retrieved from http://theses.gla.ac.uk/6912/

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Home visiting is not a substantial element of the program
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Palmer, M. L., Henderson, M., Sanders, M. R., Keown, L. J., & White, J. (2015). Erratum: “Study protocol: Evaluation of a parenting and stress management programme: A randomised controlled trial of Triple P Discussion Groups and Stress Control.” BMC Public Health, 15(1), 256.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: This citation is not a primary study
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1
Download