Research Manuscript Database

Search for a study manuscript by keyword or select any filter to see results. For more information about how HomVEE reviews studies, see HomVEE's Methods and Standards Resources.

Filter By

Model

Manuscript Rating

Outcome domains examined

States in which the research was conducted

Manuscripts with subgroup findings

Populations served

Child age at the time of enrollment

Delivery Method

Intervention delivered in non-English language

Setting in which research was conducted

Search By

Displaying 171 - 180 of 332, sorted alphabetically Export list of citations

New Zealand & Early Childhood Development. (1999). Ahuru mowai. Wellington, N.Z.: Early Childhood Development.

Model(s) Reviewed: Parents as First Teachers (New Zealand)

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: HomVEE could not obtain the text of this manuscript
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Nowak, C., & Heinrichs, N. (2008). A comprehensive meta-analysis of Triple P-Positive Parenting Program using hierarchical linear modeling: Effectiveness and moderating variables. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 11(3), 114-144.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Ineligible study design
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Nowak, C., & Heinrichs, N. (2008). A comprehensive meta-analysis of Triple P-Positive Parenting Program using hierarchical linear modeling: Effectiveness and moderating variables. Clinical Child & Family Psychology Review, 11(3), 114-144.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Ineligible study design
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Nowak, C., & Heinrichs, N. (2008). A comprehensive meta-analysis of Triple P-Positive Parenting Program using hierarchical linear modeling: Effectiveness and moderating variables. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 11(3), 114.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Ineligible study design
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Ozbek, A., Gencer, O., & Mustan, A. T. (2018). Which parents dropout from an evidence-based parenting programme (Triple-P) at CAMHS? Comparison of programme-completing and dropout parents. Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 1-14.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Ineligible study design
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Özyurt, G., Dinsever, C., Caliskan, Z., & Evgin, D. (2018). Can positive parenting program (Triple P) be useful to prevent child maltreatment? Indian Journal of Psychiatry, 60(3), 286.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Study does not examine a relevant target population
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Özyurt, G., Dinsever, Ç., Çalişkan, Z., & Evgin, D. (2018). Effects of Triple P on Digital Technological Device Use in Preschool Children. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 27(1), 280–289.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Study does not examine a relevant target population
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Özyurt, G., Gencer, Ö., Öztürk, Y., & Özbek, A. (2016). Is triple P positive parenting program effective on anxious children and their parents? 4th month follow up results. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 25(5), 1646–1655.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Study does not examine a relevant target population
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Ozyurt, G., Gencer, O., Oztürk, Y., & Ozbek, A. (2014). P. 4. d. 003 Long term effectiveness of Triple P Positive Parenting Program on childhood anxiety disorders: A randomised controlled trial. European Neuropsychopharmacology, (24), S613.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Study does not examine a relevant target population
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Ozyurt, G., Gencer, O., Oztürk, Y., & Ozbek, A. (2014). P. 4. d. 003 Long term effectiveness of Triple P Positive Parenting Program on childhood anxiety disorders: A randomised controlled trial. European Neuropsychopharmacology, (24), S613.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Study does not examine a relevant target population
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1
Download