Research Manuscript Database

Search for a study manuscript by keyword or select any filter to see results. For more information about how HomVEE reviews studies, see HomVEE's Methods and Standards Resources.

Filter By

Model

Manuscript Rating

Outcome domains examined

States in which the research was conducted

Manuscripts with subgroup findings

Populations served

Child age at the time of enrollment

Delivery Method

Intervention delivered in non-English language

Setting in which research was conducted

Search By

Displaying 81 - 90 of 366, sorted alphabetically Export list of citations

Ehrensaft, M. K., Knous-Westfall, H. M., & Alonso, T. L. (2016). Web-based prevention of parenting difficulties in young, urban mothers enrolled in post-secondary education. The Journal of Primary Prevention, 37(6), 527–542.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Study does not examine a relevant target population

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Einfeld, S. L., Stancliffe, R. J., Gray, K. M., Sofronoff, K., Rice, L., Emerson, E., & Yasamy, M. T. (2012). Interventions provided by parents for children with intellectual disabilities in low and middle income countries. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 25(2), 135-142.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Ineligible study design

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Errázuriz, P., Cerfogli, C., Moreno, G., & Soto, G. (2016). Perception of Chilean parents on the triple P Program for improving parenting practices. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 25(11), 3440–3449.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Study does not examine a relevant target population

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Esehaghzadeh, F., Reyhani, T., Moharari, F., & Mazlom, S. R. (2018). Effect of training Positive Parenting Program on mother-child relationship among mothers of children with externalizing disorders. Evidence Based Care, 8(2), 58–66.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Study does not examine a relevant target population

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Euser, S., Vrijhof, C. I., Van den Bulk, B. G, Vermeulen, R., Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., & van IJzendoorn, M. H. (2021). Video-feedback promotes sensitive limit-setting in parents of twin preschoolers: A randomized controlled trial. BMC Psychology, 9(1), 1–14.

Model(s) Reviewed: Video-Feedback Intervention to promote Positive Parenting–Sensitive Discipline® (VIPP–SD)

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Study does not examine a relevant target population 

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2.1

Evans, G. A. (2014). Parenting skills training as an intervention for tic disorders (Doctoral dissertation, the University of Manchester). Retrieved from https://www.research.manchester.ac.uk/portal/files/54554997/FULL_TEXT.P…

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Ineligible study design

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Evans, T., Boyd, R. N., Colditz, P., Sanders, M., & Whittingham, K. (2017). Baby triple p for parents of a very preterm infant: A case study. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 26(2), 633–642.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Ineligible study design

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Evans, T., Boyd, R. N., Colditz, P., Sanders, M., & Whittingham, K. (2017). Mother-very preterm infant relationship quality: RCT of baby Triple P. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 26(1), 284–295.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Home visiting is not a substantial element of the program

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

O'Farrelly, C., Barker, B., Watt, H., Babalis, D., Bakermans-Kranenburg, M., Byford, S., ... & Ramchandani, P. (2021). A video-feedback parenting intervention to prevent enduring behaviour problems in at-risk children aged 12-36 months: the Healthy Start, Happy Start RCT. Health Technology Assessment, 25(29), 1.

Model(s) Reviewed: Video-Feedback Intervention to promote Positive Parenting–Sensitive Discipline® (VIPP–SD)

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Ineligible study design   

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2.1

O’Farrelly, C., Watt, H., Babalis, D., Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., Barker, B., Byford, S., ... & Ramchandani, P. G. (2021). A brief home-based parenting intervention to reduce behavior problems in young children: a pragmatic randomized clinical trial. JAMA Pediatrics, 175(6), 567-576.

Model(s) Reviewed: Video-Feedback Intervention to promote Positive Parenting–Sensitive Discipline® (VIPP–SD)

View Manuscript
High rating
This manuscript received a rating of high because it is a randomized-controlled trial with low-attrition.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2.1
Download XLSX